Re: Help with new ARIA TOSCA proposal

This is an area I'm focusing on right now. I can sign up to mentor, if that would be useful. -Jakob On 24 May 2016 at 17:57, John D. Ament wrote: > Hi, > > If you're still looking for help, I'd be happy to step up. > > John > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:34 AM Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > >> Hi

Re: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Paul On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:12 AM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > - Tsuyoshi > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Reynold Xin wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Andrew Purtell > wrote: > > > >> Since discussion on the matter of Pred

Re: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) - Tsuyoshi On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Reynold Xin wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > >> Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like >> to call a VOTE >> on accepting PredictionIO into the Apac

Re: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like > to call a VOTE > on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator. > > Proposal: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PredictionIO > > ​[ ] +1 Accep

Re: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

+1 -Jake On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like > to call a VOTE > on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator. > > Proposal: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PredictionIO > > ​[ ] +1 Accept Pr

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) -Jake On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:56 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. > > This vote will run for the usual 72 hours. > > ### PROPOSA

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. > > This vote will run for the usual 72 hours. An enthusiastic +1 Roman. ---

Re: Help with new ARIA TOSCA proposal

Hi, If you're still looking for help, I'd be happy to step up. John On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:34 AM Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Hi folks, > > I am an ASF member but I have not been involved with the incubator much. > > The last few weeks I have been chatting with folks at Gigaspaces [1]. Some

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

+1 binding ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov W

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Have fun guys! On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. > > This vote will run for the usual 72 hours. > > #

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) -Taylor > On May 24, 2016, at 1:56 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. > > This vote will run for the usual 72 hours. > > ### PRO

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:41 PM Drew Farris wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, May 24, 2016, 5:27 PM Andrew Purtell wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Daniel Gruno > > wrote: > > > > > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now ca

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, May 24, 2016, 5:27 PM Andrew Purtell wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Daniel Gruno > wrote: > > > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. >

Re: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) — Hitesh > On May 23, 2016, at 3:22 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > > Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like > to call a VOTE > on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator. > > Proposal: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PredictionIO > > ​[

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. > > This vote will run for the usual 72 hours. > > ### PROPOSAL BEL

Re: [DISCUSS] CarbonData incubation proposal

Hi Nick Thanks for your questions. The initial committers are contributors who are fully involved for CarbonData project, after some time based on contribution and Meritocracy , we will include more contributors into the committer list. 1.Some of the committers are actually located in the US (in

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. > > This vote will run for the usual 72 hours. > > ### PROPOSAL BELO

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Very great experience, people love the lists.apache.org when I introduced it to them! Thanks. Luke Best Regards! - Luke Han On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Seetharam Venkatesh < venkat...@innerzeal.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > All the best, > Venkatesh >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) All the best, Venkatesh On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:05 AM Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > > On May 23, 2016, at 11:56 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > > > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for po

Re: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) All the best, Venkatesh On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:15 AM Ralph Goers wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Ralph > > > On May 24, 2016, at 3:44 AM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 6:23 PM Andrew Purtell > wrote: > > > >> Since discussion on the matter of Pred

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 0.9.0-incubating-rc1

Hello all, I would like to make an open request to the PMC community: if you have the time, could you please take a look at this release candidate and cast a vote? This release contains some critical bug fixes, so we would like to release it if possible. I can tell from all the traffic that ther

[VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating) - rc3

Incubator PMC: Apache Ranger community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating). [VOTE RESULT] thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/Ztlreja8-xl1xr8 Apache ranger-0.5.3-rc3 release candidate (addressing few issues raised in previous IPMC revi

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

> On May 23, 2016, at 11:56 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. > > This vote will run for the usual 72 hours. +1 (binding). — leif ---

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.1.2-incubating [rc2] (Revised)

Hi Gary. You want to summarize all the votes, including the ones on the project's dev list, here - I (and others) had voted on the dev list thread already. Patrick On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Gary wrote: > Hi all, > > > After being open for over 72 hours, the vote for releasing Apache Mnem

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.1.2-incubating [rc2] (Revised)

Hi all, After being open for over 72 hours, the vote for releasing Apache Mnemonic 0.1.2-incubating passed with 3 binding +1s and no +0 and no -1. Binding +1s: Henry Saputra Justin Mclean Gangumalla, Uma A issue we need to work on - 1. Justin had issues building from source on OSX . We

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Billie Rinaldi wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Daniel Gruno > wrote: > > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. > > This vote will run for the usual 72 hours. > > ### PROPOSAL BELOW

Re: [DISCUSS] Accept SensSoft into the Incubator

Hi Ted, Thank you for your input. Replies inline On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 6:44 AM, wrote: > > From: Ted Dunning > To: "general@incubator.apache.org" > Cc: jpo...@draper.com > Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 09:44:15 -0400 > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Accept SensSoft into the Incubator > This looks like an e

Re: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Ralph > On May 24, 2016, at 3:44 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > > +1 > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 6:23 PM Andrew Purtell wrote: > >> Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like >> to call a VOTE >> on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator. >>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Ralph > On May 23, 2016, at 10:56 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. > > This vote will run for the usual 72 hours. > > ### PROP

Re: [DISCUSS] CarbonData incubation proposal

On Thu, 19 May 2016, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: The proposal is included below and also available on the wiki: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CarbonDataProposal Comparing the Initial Committers list with the Github contributors list, there look to be a few people currently quite involved

Re: [DISCUSS] Accept SensSoft into the Incubator

This looks like an excellent project. How likely is it that it will be able to survive a hypothetical loss of DARPA funding? On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:00 PM, lewis john mcgibbney wrote: > Hi general@, > I would like to open a DISCUSS thread on the topic of accepting The > Software as a Sensor

Help with new ARIA TOSCA proposal

Hi folks, I am an ASF member but I have not been involved with the incubator much. The last few weeks I have been chatting with folks at Gigaspaces [1]. Some of you may know them as the ones behind Cloudify [2] a cloud orchestration platform. The folks at Gigaspaces are interested to donate th

Re: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 6:23 PM Andrew Purtell wrote: > Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like > to call a VOTE > on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator. > > Proposal: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PredictionIO > > ​[ ] +1 Accept Prediction

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:56 AM Daniel Gruno wrote: > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. > > This vote will run for the usual 72 hours. > > ### PROPOSAL BELOW ##

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:56 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. > > This vote will run for the usual 72 hours. +1 (binding) - Sam Ruby --

Re: [DISCUSS] CarbonData incubation proposal

Thank you Julian!! we are going to prepare a BD scan result to ensure source code clearance is done properly, and as an ongoing effort to do a diligent job as we move forward on this regards. Regards. Jihong -- View this message in context: http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.c

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) This is a good approach. In the past we have seen a few TopLevel projects spawned on the basis of its core product being in use as an ASF internal solution without having gone through the incubation proces. Some of these projects lead a marginal existence, don't do releases and do

Re: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:22 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like > to call a VOTE > on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator. > > Proposal: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PredictionIO > > ​[ ] +1 Accep

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

+1 (not binding) Jacques Le 24/05/2016 à 07:56, Daniel Gruno a écrit : Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. This vote will run for the usual 72 hours. ### PROPOSAL BELOW ##

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) (Thank you guys for doing this.) *Myrle Krantz* Solutions Architect RɅĐɅЯ, The Mifos Initiative mkra...@mifos.org | Skype: mkrantz.mifos.org | http://mifos.org On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] PredictionIO incubation proposal

Hi everyone I just want to make it clear that my suggestion was in no way some sort of attempt to hijack the project or push a corporate agenda. For me personally, I have not been directly involved in PredictionIO, that is true. I have however spent the past 3 years prior to joining IBM building