By the way, it looks good to me ;)
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 04/08/2016 03:04 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
All,
Below is the current draft of the April 2016 report. I'm sending it early,
and likely often, to help muster community input on the various sections of
the report. As of now, 1 day past du
+1 (binding from PPMC and IPMC)
- Built on el6 using devtoolset
- Ran tests - hit a couple of flakies which seem to occur more often on HDD
machines (vs our usual test environment which is SSD), but nothing serious
- Been endurance-testing something very close to this rc on a 9-node
cluster for a
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 04/06/2016 11:52 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote:
Hi,
The PPMC vote to release Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.8.0 RC1 passed and I'm
now submitting this to the IPMC.
Vote thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-kudu-dev/201604.mbox/%3CCAGpTDNfA-hsv6xkeNc
Hi John,
I don't see Apache Beam in the report.
I would like to do a report for Beam next month and so update the report
cycle. No objection ? Can we talk together about that ?
Thanks,
Regards
JB
On 04/08/2016 03:04 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
All,
Below is the current draft of the April 2016
I think we reached consensus, so let me close this vote and report the
(formal) result:
There are 11 +1 votes (more than 5 of them binding), no 0 and no -1
votes (one was withdrawn)
So this vote passed, we will submit the resolution to the board.
Thanks to all who cast their vote and thanks als
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Till Westmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> AsterixDB started incubating a little more than a year ago (2015-02-28) [1]
> and the members of the community think that it is ready to graduate from
> the
> incubator to be a TLP.
>
> Since starting incubation the comm
+1 from me great job team
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: chris.a.matt
Hi,
AsterixDB started incubating a little more than a year ago (2015-02-28) [1]
and the members of the community think that it is ready to graduate from the
incubator to be a TLP.
Since starting incubation the community has shipped 2 incubating Apache
releases for AsterixDB and Hyracks:
- Apache
no disagreement here, i've observed the same and agree that this project
has not been able to develop or attract any sort of community involvement
and that it would be best at this time for Concerted to retire from the
Incubator
-Jake
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Chris Nauroth
wrote:
> Hello
All,
Below is the current draft of the April 2016 report. I'm sending it early,
and likely often, to help muster community input on the various sections of
the report. As of now, 1 day past due, we are still missing 4 podling
reports. I have doubts that they'll be completed, but hopefully this
I say let it go.
My own guess is that unless there is a strong recruitment effort it will
soon become unreleasable, but, as Roman points out, there are mechanisms to
deal with that.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 5:17 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> So what do we have to do to draw this vote to a resoluti
So what do we have to do to draw this vote to a resolution? It seems that
the general consensus is positive to graduate, but there's some concerns
over the size of the podling. It satisfies the minimum practical TLP.
John
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:14 PM Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7,
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> The strict limit is 3. The practical limit is probably more like 5.
Like I said: FWIW I see no problem with a project with a PMC count of
3 active members. We have board reports for a reason (should that active
bit ever become a problem).
Than
The strict limit is 3. The practical limit is probably more like 5.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Mark Struberg
> wrote:
> > We again got a few contributions in the last days, so I really think we
> will do fine and add committers
+1 (binding, mentor)
+ Checked sig and hash
+ Ran build on macox. Ran nice and smooth.
+ Ran unit tests. Ran into KUDU-1394. Added addr2line to my path and gdb.
Got further but still a few test failures. Added my experience to KUDU-1394.
+ Ran rat on java subdir
+ Poked around the layout; looks go
On 04/07/2016 08:59 PM, Casey Stella wrote:
> Sorry, wrong quote:
>
> For small amounts of source that is directly consumed by the ASF product at
>> runtime in source form, and for which that source is unmodified and
>> unlikely to be changed anyway (say, by virtue of being specified by a
>> stand
Daniel,
MPL isn't explicitly restricted. see [1]. It looks like the podling has
properly cited it, see [2]. This does generally say that you cannot
include in a source release.
[1]: http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
[2]: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/blob/maste
Sorry, wrong quote:
For small amounts of source that is directly consumed by the ASF product at
> runtime in source form, and for which that source is unmodified and
> unlikely to be changed anyway (say, by virtue of being specified by a
> standard), inclusion of appropriately labeled source is al
Hey Daniel,
Thanks for looking at it. Yes, that reference file is licensed under MPL
and as per the instructions at
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b:
> By attaching an appropriate and prominent label to the distribution, and
> requiring an explicit action by the user to get t
I ran it through my usual compliance check, which yielded:
Non-compliant license (Mozilla Public License/2.0) found in
incubator-metron-Metron_0.1BETA_rc7/metron-streaming/Metron-Common/src/test/resources/effective_tld_names.dat
Non-compliant license (Mozilla Public License/2.0) found in
This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7
Full list of changes in this release:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC7-incubating/CHANGES
The tag/commit to be voted upon is Metron_0.1BETA_rc7:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-me
Ok, I’ve started a DISCUSS thread.
> On Apr 7, 2016, at 11:24 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Julian Hyde wrote:
>> I agree. I think this project has been dead for a while, and we’re just
>> prolonging the agony.
>
> As an initial Champion (but NOT a mentor) I
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Mark Struberg
wrote:
> We again got a few contributions in the last days, so I really think we will
> do fine and add committers soon.
FWIW: I'm honestly very relaxed about the # of committers. All the project
has to have is an active PMC of at least 3. That's th
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> I agree. I think this project has been dead for a while, and we’re just
> prolonging the agony.
As an initial Champion (but NOT a mentor) I have to agree :-(
> If we were to wind up the project, how would we proceed? A vote on
> concerted's
We again got a few contributions in the last days, so I really think we will do
fine and add committers soon.
LieGrue,
strub
> On Thursday, 7 April 2016, 4:03, John D. Ament wrote:
> > It seems that the general consensus is a +1.
> Is there anyone who has a strong feeling that Johnzon shou
I agree. I think this project has been dead for a while, and we’re just
prolonging the agony.
If we were to wind up the project, how would we proceed? A vote on concerted's
dev list with lazy consensus, I presume?
Is there any reason why I should not start a discussion/vote right now?
Julian
+1 (binding).
Thanks,
Venkatesh
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:51 PM Edward J. Yoon
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> --
> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofre [mailto:j...@nanthrax.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 3:04 PM
> To: general@incubator.apac
Hello John,
Thank you for bringing up the topic again. As a Concerted mentor, I was
planning to do the same today.
Just to confirm your observations, you are correct that there has been no
further visible progress. The only activity on the mailing list is from
the mentors asking if anything is
Sorry to bring back this long dead topic, but wanted to rehash what was
discussed here.
We're now 3 months later, and it seems that Concerted has not improved. is
it time to call it?
John
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 3:58 PM Ross Gardler
wrote:
> +1
>
> Everyone should read the subject and reset.
>
Thanks, Nick!
Masatake
On 4/7/16 15:37, Nick Burch wrote:
On Thu, 7 Apr 2016, Masatake Iwasaki wrote:
I am a committer of Apache HTrace (incubating).
I would like a permission to edit wiki to update board report.
(https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2016)
My user name in the wiki is Masata
30 matches
Mail list logo
