Re: [VOTE] Accept Omid into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-23 Thread Josh Elser
+1 (binding) Daniel Dai wrote: Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept Omid as a new Incubator project. [ ] +1 Accept Omid into the Incubator [ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Omid [ ] -1 Do not accept Omid because ... The vote will be open for the next 72 hours.

Fwd: [VOTE] Graduate Apex from the Incubator

2016-03-23 Thread Thomas Weise
Please note that a graduation community [VOTE] is in progress for Apache Apex. Thanks, Thomas -- Forwarded message -- From: Pramod Immaneni Date: Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:36 AM Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apex from the Incubator To: d...@apex.incubator.apache.org Dear Community, B

Re: Policy should be simple (was "Allowed Champions on podlings")

2016-03-23 Thread Henri Yandell
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > Right now, Apache's rules are so complex that we are all in perpetual > violation. You can't even know what all the rules are! > First, your podling was not part of our charter nor our licensing agreement so I must do nothing. And sec

Re: [VOTE] Accept Omid into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-23 Thread Amol Kekre
+1 Thks Amol On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > +1 (binding) -C > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Daniel Dai wrote: > > Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept Omid as > > a new Incubator project. > > > > [ ] +1 Accept Omid into the Incubator > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Omid into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-23 Thread Chris Douglas
+1 (binding) -C On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Daniel Dai wrote: > Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept Omid as > a new Incubator project. > > [ ] +1 Accept Omid into the Incubator > [ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Omid > [ ] -1 Do not accept Omid because ... >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Omid into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-23 Thread Julian Hyde
+1 (binding) Julian > On Mar 23, 2016, at 4:16 PM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > -Flavio > >> On 23 Mar 2016, at 22:42, James Taylor wrote: >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Chris Nauroth >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> --Chris Nauroth >>> >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Omid into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-23 Thread Flavio Junqueira
+1 (binding) -Flavio > On 23 Mar 2016, at 22:42, James Taylor wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Chris Nauroth > wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> --Chris Nauroth >> >> >> >> >> On 3/23/16, 3:31 PM, "Daniel Dai" wrote: >> >>> Following the discussion earlier, I'

Re: [VOTE] Accept Omid into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-23 Thread James Taylor
+1 (binding) On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Chris Nauroth wrote: > +1 (binding) > > --Chris Nauroth > > > > > On 3/23/16, 3:31 PM, "Daniel Dai" wrote: > > >Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept Omid as > >a new Incubator project. > > > >[ ] +1 Accept Omid into the Inc

Re: [VOTE] Accept Omid into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-23 Thread Chris Nauroth
+1 (binding) --Chris Nauroth On 3/23/16, 3:31 PM, "Daniel Dai" wrote: >Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept Omid as >a new Incubator project. > >[ ] +1 Accept Omid into the Incubator >[ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Omid >[ ] -1 Do not accept Omid because ..

[VOTE] Accept Omid into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-23 Thread Daniel Dai
Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept Omid as a new Incubator project. [ ] +1 Accept Omid into the Incubator [ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Omid [ ] -1 Do not accept Omid because ... The vote will be open for the next 72 hours. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

2016-03-23 Thread Daniel Dai
Thanks for the comments. Though there are already lots of +1s, this thread is not intended for voting. I will send out the voting email shortly. Daniel On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 1:08 PM, James Taylor wrote: > That'd be great to allow different transaction frameworks to plug into > Phoenix. I suspe

Re: [PROPOSAL] : Airflow

2016-03-23 Thread Stian Soiland-Reyes
The Airflow project seem to be in good shape! :) As for mailing list transition, I'm afraid that can be a bit rough for any community. You can't simply set up forwarding as then the users would not get any replies to the new list. Each individual user will have to subscribe again to the new list