Re: [VOTE] Accept Tephra into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-04 Thread Julian Hyde
+1 (binding) > On Mar 4, 2016, at 12:57 PM, Alan Gates wrote: > > +1 (binding). > > Alan. > >> On Mar 3, 2016, at 17:29, Poorna Chandra wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> Tephra proposal was sent out for discussion last week. The proposal is >> available at https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TephraP

Re: [VOTE] Accept Tephra into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-04 Thread Alan Gates
+1 (binding). Alan. > On Mar 3, 2016, at 17:29, Poorna Chandra wrote: > > Hi All, > > Tephra proposal was sent out for discussion last week. The proposal is > available at https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TephraProposal > > Please vote to accept Tephra into the Apache Incubator. The vote wil

Re: [VOTE] Accept Tephra into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-04 Thread Andreas Neumann
+1 (non-binding) -Andreas. On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Terence Yim wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Terence > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 1:13 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > > > On 03/04/2016 02:29 AM, Poorna Chandra wrote: > > > >> Hi All, >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Tephra into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-04 Thread Terence Yim
+1 (non-binding) Terence On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 1:13 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > > On 03/04/2016 02:29 AM, Poorna Chandra wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Tephra proposal was sent out for discussion last week. The proposal is >> available at https://wiki.apache.

Re: Update on Apache Toree and LGPL dependency

2016-03-04 Thread Gino Bustelo
Thanks @stian. I was trying to sell them on the bigger picture that being able to consume 0MQ within Apache projects would increase their user base. On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > I know software licensing can be a difficult thing to investigate, not > to mention c

Re: Update on Apache Toree and LGPL dependency

2016-03-04 Thread Stian Soiland-Reyes
I know software licensing can be a difficult thing to investigate, not to mention change! So very well done for managing to influence another open source project! Apache projects don't live in isolation, and participating in the wider community is also an important aspect of open development. I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)

2016-03-04 Thread Tom Barber
No problem sweet cheeks On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Awesome, thanks Tom ! > > Regards > JB > > > On 03/04/2016 10:42 AM, Tom Barber wrote: > >> +1 Binding >> >> Checked and built. Headers look good. License, Notice and Disclaimer look >> good. >> >> Tom >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)

2016-03-04 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Awesome, thanks Tom ! Regards JB On 03/04/2016 10:42 AM, Tom Barber wrote: +1 Binding Checked and built. Headers look good. License, Notice and Disclaimer look good. Tom On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Gently reminder: we need at lest one more IPMC vote to acce

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)

2016-03-04 Thread Tom Barber
+1 Binding Checked and built. Headers look good. License, Notice and Disclaimer look good. Tom On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Gently reminder: we need at lest one more IPMC vote to accept the release. > > Thanks ! > Regards > JB > > On 02/15/2016 10:02 AM, Jean-B

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)

2016-03-04 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Gently reminder: we need at lest one more IPMC vote to accept the release. Thanks ! Regards JB On 02/15/2016 10:02 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi all, I submit Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating release to your vote (take 4, new tentative fixing NOTICE file). A vote was held on developer maili

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-04 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB On 03/02/2016 04:06 PM, Gangumalla, Uma wrote: +1 (non-binding) Regards, Uma On 3/1/16, 4:53 PM, "Andrew Purtell" wrote: Greetings, The discussion of the Gearpump proposal has concluded. Please vote to accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator. I will leave this vo

Re: [VOTE] Accept Mnemonic into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-04 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB On 03/03/2016 08:19 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: +1 (binding) -Taylor On Feb 29, 2016, at 12:37 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: Hi folks, OK the discussion is now completed. Please VOTE to accept Mnemonic into the Apache Incubator. I’ll leave the VOTE open for at least the n

Re: [VOTE] Accept Tephra into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-04 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB On 03/04/2016 02:29 AM, Poorna Chandra wrote: Hi All, Tephra proposal was sent out for discussion last week. The proposal is available at https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TephraProposal Please vote to accept Tephra into the Apache Incubator. The vote will be open for

RE: [VOTE] Accept Tephra into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-04 Thread Vasudevan, Ramkrishna S
+1 (non-binding) Regards Ram -Original Message- From: Andrew Purtell [mailto:andrew.purt...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 4, 2016 11:55 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Tephra into the Apache Incubator +1 (binding) > On Mar 3, 2016, at 5:29 PM, Poorna Cha

RE: [VOTE] Accept Tephra into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-04 Thread Vasudevan, Ramkrishna S
+1(non-binding) Regards Ram -Original Message- From: Andrew Purtell [mailto:andrew.purt...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 4, 2016 11:55 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Tephra into the Apache Incubator +1 (binding) > On Mar 3, 2016, at 5:29 PM, Poorna Chan