Dirk,
Thanks for the answer as well.
Dor
-Original Message-
From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [mailto:di...@webweaving.org]
Sent: יום ב 22 פברואר 2016 20:25
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [MARKETING] Re: License question
On 21 Feb 2016, at 14:25, Dor Ben Dov wrote:
> Let's say
Hey Ted,
I'm working with Yanping in same Big Data Technologies U.S R&D team. Let me
try to explain the potential possible way to leverage the power of Arrow for
Mnemonic.
Our initial thoughts about the connection with Arrow are Mnemonic could
directly provide Arrow based collections fo
Hi Justin,
I think that the version of RainbowVis-JS that is part of the release is
indeed used under
the MIT-licensed.
There reasons are that
a) it says so in the header of the file
b) the file has not been modified since Mar 28 2014
c) the author of the file stated on a GitHub issue [1] on A
Hi, All
I uploaded a PDF presentation that describes Project Mnemonic with some nice
pictures.
Click Attachment link below to see the presentation.
Attachment name: Project_Mnemonic_Pub1.0.pdf
Attachment size: 1493317
Attachment link:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MnemonicProposal?action=A
Yes, Jacques, it is exciting to see Arrow and Mnemonic can leverage each other.
I looked at Apache Drill today. I think Drill can use Mnemonic to optimize
scalable data sources.
So the idea is, Mnemonic takes Arrow as a columnar data construct or collection
that optimized from memory to CPU cach
Yanping,
Could you explain some of the ways that you see that Arrow might be useful
to Mnemonic and how Mnemonic extends the generality of Arrow (probably with
performance consequences)?
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Jacques Nadeau wrote:
> Hey YanPing,
>
> This addition is nice to see. I
In addition to Justin's notes about the release, I believe there may be
some confusion on your part about binding vs non-binding votes.
PPMC members binding votes only count towards personnel changes. IPMC
votes count towards releases. Of those you listed as binding, only the
following are bindi
Hi,
Sorry but -1 (binding) due to source release containing EPL licensed software
I checked the source release:
- incubating in release name
- signatures and hashes correct
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE is missing a few thing and incorrectly lists licenses (see below)
- NOTICE year is incorrect
-
Thanks, we'll check with legal before our next release (or just remove the file)
-Todd
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Right, we actually noticed this as well and got in touch with the ACM
>> to clarify the licensing. We already fixed it for the next release in
>
Hi,
> Right, we actually noticed this as well and got in touch with the ACM
> to clarify the licensing. We already fixed it for the next release in
> this commit:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-kudu/commit/6991cd432d0be35743995b3ca7cb5eedc072e3cb
>
> Given it's not software so much as a te
Hi,
> Hmm, I'm not seeing this -- got a line number? Line 614 in LICENSE.txt
> says "StumbleUpon”.
Sorry it was WebRTC line 360 and also LevelDB line 315.
> Can you clarify what this means?
See [1] basically a pointer to the full test of the license in the source
release.
> Given it's not so
Hey Justin,
Thanks a lot for taking the time to check out the rc and vote. A
couple notes inline:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 (binding). Nice work on the LICENSE.
>
> I checked:
> - signature and hashes correct
> - release name contain incubating
> - DISCLA
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> > Porting over my +1 from the podling vote. Not sure if it's binding in the
> > IPMC context if I already voted as PPMC.
>
> Traditionally such IPMC votes carry over. It's good (but
Hey YanPing,
This addition is nice to see. I agree that there is great opportunity for
the Arrow and Mnemonic communities to collaborate. I look forward to
working together.
Jacques
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Wang, Yanping
wrote:
> Hi, All
>
> Based on feedback, we added following into M
Hi,
+1 (binding). Nice work on the LICENSE.
I checked:
- signature and hashes correct
- release name contain incubating
- DISCLAIMER exits
- LICENSE file has some minor issues (see below)
- NOTICE good
- unable to compile on OS X (but notes say it only has experiment support)
Minor issues LICENS
If it's still useful, please count my "+1". (Sorry for missing it earlier.)
Chen
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Ian Maxon wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Please verify and vote on the first binary and second source release of
> Apache AsterixDB. Source-wise, is an update of 0.8.7 with bugfixes and
Hi, All
Based on feedback, we added following into Mnemonic proposal:
Relationships with Other Apache Product
+ Relationship with Apache™ Arrow:
+ Arrow's columnar data layout allows great use of CPU caches & SIMD. It places
all data that relevant to a column operation in a compact fo
Hi Everyone,
Please verify and vote on the first binary and second source release of
Apache AsterixDB. Source-wise, is an update of 0.8.7 with bugfixes and
changes to our license files and packaging to make a compliant binary
release possible. Many thanks to Ate for his tremendous effort in helpin
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> Porting over my +1 from the podling vote. Not sure if it's binding in the
> IPMC context if I already voted as PPMC.
Traditionally such IPMC votes carry over. It's good (but not a
requirement) for the release manager to list the Mentor/IPMC v
Porting over my +1 from the podling vote. Not sure if it's binding in the
IPMC context if I already voted as PPMC.
Todd
On Feb 22, 2016 7:10 AM, "Jean-Daniel Cryans" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The PPMC vote to release Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.0's RC3 passed and
> I'm now submitting this to the IPMC.
>
On 21 Feb 2016, at 14:25, Dor Ben Dov wrote:
> Let's say I (company) go the ASF way.
>
> To incubator and later on into TLP.
>
> Does it mean that the license would be in the end only Apache License 2 ? or
> can it still remain for example, lgpl ?
Any and all code the ASF releases/distributes
PIng? Can I get a confirmation that you are OK with Toree proceeding
under similar circumstances? They are actively working towards a
release.
If you like, I can open a legal JIRA or move this to legal-discuss.
- Sam Ruby
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016
That's great, thanks Debo, I will add you as additional interested contributors.
Thanks
Yanping
-Original Message-
From: Debo Dutta (dedutta) [mailto:dedu...@cisco.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 3:26 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Mnemonic incubator prop
Hi,
The PPMC vote to release Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.0's RC3 passed and
I'm now submitting this to the IPMC.
Vote thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-kudu-dev/201602.mbox/%3CCAGpTDNepARg8zW%2BXdoorQV48KSfkemi5HLuzgeeJarMTXcNF%3Dw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
Result:
http://mai
24 matches
Mail list logo
