Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

2016-01-23 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Seshu, it does both: streaming and batching data processing. Regards JB On 01/23/2016 03:01 PM, Adunuthula, Seshu wrote: Did not get a chance to play with it yet, Within Google is it used more as a MR replacement or a Stream processing engine? Or it does both of them fantastically well? O

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

2016-01-23 Thread Adunuthula, Seshu
Did not get a chance to play with it yet, Within Google is it used more as a MR replacement or a Stream processing engine? Or it does both of them fantastically well? On 1/22/16, 10:58 AM, "Frances Perry" wrote: >Crunch started as a clone of FlumeJava, which was Google internal. In the >meantim

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

2016-01-23 Thread Luke Han
Very great proposal! Agreed to Stain, the name, Dataflow, is used widely long time, maybe should think about another one. Thanks. Best Regards! - Luke Han On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 1/22/16, 10:58 AM, "Frances Perry" wrote: > > >Crunch

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

2016-01-23 Thread John D. Ament
+1 binding Ideally when sending the vote, use the commit hash in the URL - https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-freemarker.git;a=shortlog;h=b9ca91dd5c3b04121f5ddcb9f6194c1e7931ba2c A general question - should the copyright dates include the project's origin date? On Wed, Jan 20,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

2016-01-23 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
+1 (binding) Jacopo Cappellato On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > Hi all, > > The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a proposal > to release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01-incubating. > > PPMC Vote Calls (2 cancelled votes, the 3rd is the final iteration)