Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes correct
- DISCLAIMER exist
- LICENSE and NOTICE correct
- all source file have apache headers
- no unexpected binary files
- can compile from source
The year needs updating in the NOTICE file.
I also had a quick look at the
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Danese Cooper wrote:
>
>> It is true that the ASF and the FSF have historically been religiously
>> incompatible on the subject of licensing combinatorics. As I usually
>> explain to my clients, the worst case
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>>The ticking time bomb, as we discovered several months in, was the
>>disconcertingly-named “Category X list”, described at
>>http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html (under "Which licenses may not
>>be included within apache products?”). This l
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes correct
- disclaimer exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE correct
- no binary files
- all files have apache source headers
- can compile from source
Very minor issue - year is incorrect in NOTICE.
Thanks
Justin
-
Hi,
+1 binding, but please looking into the issues below for next release.
I checked:
- name contain incubating
- signature and hash good
- disclaimer exists
- NOTICE and LICENSE have some issues
- there a few source files without Apache headers e.g. python scripts in [1]
- no unexpected binary f
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Markus Geiß wrote:
>...
> Since we are in incubation now (Apache Fineract), I'm wondering how we
> will deal
> with this in the future. Is the IPMC supporting GSOC, is it the
> responsibility of the
> project community, or is Apache in general pro things like GSOC
The vote is as usually open for at least 72 hours.
Here's my +1.
Hadrian
On 01/16/2016 03:12 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
Hi,
The iota proposal [1] (initially Tempo) was proposed about 6 weeks ago.
Because of the naming conflict that would have likely required to change
name at graduation, th
Hi,
The iota proposal [1] (initially Tempo) was proposed about 6 weeks ago.
Because of the naming conflict that would have likely required to change
name at graduation, the project name was changed to "Apache iota" (the
greek letter), which resonates better with the IoT field the project
targ
> On 16 Jan 2016, at 12:32 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> Probably too late, but some comments in-line.
>
> On 1/15/16, 6:55 AM, "Peter Kelly" wrote:
>>
>> However, one important factor which really killed things for us was the
>> inability to use Qt.
>>
>> The desktop app was the main priority,
And this issue brought up that both podling.a.o and podling.i.a.o started
working at some point and a large unrelated branding issue.
I've responded to the infra ticket, my hope is that they move forward on it
at this point.
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 8:14 AM Daniel Dekany wrote:
> I'm managing mo
I'm managing most of the transition to the ASF infrastructure on
FreeMarker's side, so let me answer. My intent was that until the
project manages to graduate, freemarker.org will continue to be the
"official" and only FreeMarker homepage (as it is for 10 years or so),
only the content comes from t
11 matches
Mail list logo
