Thanks but our votes are not binding in the IPMC vote thread.
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Gaurav Gupta
wrote:
> +1 (binding) Carried over from dev list
>
> Thanks
> - Gaurav
>
> > On Jan 15, 2016, at 6:33 PM, Thomas Weise
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks to everyone who voted so far. We need one m
Hi Greg,
Thanks!
We have added the disclaimer in the download page, and will add it in the
announce email for the next release.
Best,
Wei
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 8:23 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> In the future, you MUST include the Incubation Disclaimer in your release
> announcements. Unfortunatel
All,
Please review the following IP clearance form to bring in the "KOYA"
project into the Apache Slider podling.
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/slider-koya.html
This sign-off is subject to lazy consensus and is open until 2016-01-19
0800 GMT.
Please note the following recent dis
I would recommend asking this on trademarks@a.o.
I would also recommend two separate transactions. IIRC, the SGA language
is not the right language for the trademark assignment. Some other
template should be used. Also, I believe it is in the best interests of
the Milagro trademark owner to mak
+1 (binding) Carried over from dev list
Thanks
- Gaurav
> On Jan 15, 2016, at 6:33 PM, Thomas Weise wrote:
>
> Thanks to everyone who voted so far. We need one more binding +1 to wrap it
> up please :-)
>
> Thomas
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 3:34 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
Gregory, there are great tools out there for the analysis of IoT data and we
don’t want to duplicate those efforts in iota. Rather we want to make sure iota
is fully capable of interacting with tools like Hadoop, Storm, and Flink in
those cases where the their is enough data to warrant the use o
Greg, a number of examples have been used - including a data center - but there
is no intention of focusing iota on data centers. As I mentioned below IoT is a
continuum that encompasses many use cases. iota is all about
endpoints/sensors/etc. capturing endpoints moving them (securely if needed)
Thanks to everyone who voted so far. We need one more binding +1 to wrap it
up please :-)
Thomas
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 3:34 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Licensing looks good, can build forms source, and the signatures check out.
>
> -Taylor
>
> > On Jan 12, 2016, at 10:35 PM,
So then I might suggest refining the positioning.
When I see "an enterprise IoT platform" I'm thinking of backend systems and
analysis, not end point embedded systems or devices beyond the node.
A Nest thermostat is a device, but the backend analysis and smart cloud app
that centralizes the servi
Well aware of all that. Just kind of amazed that the data center is the
focal point of this thread. That's a solved problem, rather than the IoT
endpoints/sensors/etc. It seems the hard problem is lifting data from your
embedded microcontroller, into a data packet sent via TCP/IP to $somewhere.
In
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15/01/2016 23:24, Nick Kew wrote:
> Would it make sense to append the trademark assignment to a forthcomin
g software grant?
My recommendation would be to do the trademark assignment as one grant,
and the software assignment as a second grant.
I understand Certivox/MIRACL have done the legwork of not
merely checking but also registering Milagro as a trademark
and are now looking to assign it to Apache.
I don't see any documentation or practice that explicitly
addresses this. Would it make sense to append the
trademark assignment to a f
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Could someone update wiki ProjectProposals to move OpenMiracle to Milagro?
Done.
Marvin Humphrey
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Danese Cooper wrote:
> It is true that the ASF and the FSF have historically been religiously
> incompatible on the subject of licensing combinatorics. As I usually
> explain to my clients, the worst case scenario for the FSF is that code
> become unfree (in the n
One nit with this discussion.
It's not true that GPL says it's not okay to make money. If it were then RedHat
couldn't exist.
It is true that the ASF and the FSF have historically been religiously
incompatible on the subject of licensing combinatorics. As I usually explain to
my clients, the w
I have declined to participate in any post-mortem activity.
There are some relevant matters to clarify in the bringing of this thread to
general@ incubator.a.o, however.
Comments in-line.
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 15, 201
Alex, thanks a bunch -- this was super helpful.
re-thank you to everyone else who chimed in as well!
Alex Harui wrote:
AIUI, copyrights never get re-assigned. There is a collective copyright
for the collective work, but each line of code is still owned by some
entity/person that contributed it
Probably too late, but some comments in-line.
On 1/15/16, 6:55 AM, "Peter Kelly" wrote:
>
>However, one important factor which really killed things for us was the
>inability to use Qt.
>
>The desktop app was the main priority, however.
>
>To do a cross-platform desktop app, and to do it properly,
Greg, think of this as a continuum some IoT use cases are simple ( a few
sensors) others might be at an industrial scale (data centers with 100,000s of
sensors). In between there are many other use cases. The data store needed at
different points of the continuum will be different. iota is meant
AIUI, copyrights never get re-assigned. There is a collective copyright
for the collective work, but each line of code is still owned by some
entity/person that contributed it.
Copyright law apparently only allows the copyright owner or a person they
authorize to muck with copyright statements in
Hi,
on behalf of Apache Zeppelin PPMC I'd like to call this vote for the
following RC to be released as
Apache Zeppelin incubating-0.5.6
Vote on dev@zeppelin.i.a.o
http://s.apache.org/GFy
Result of vote on dev@zeppelin.i.a.o
http://s.apache.org/DFz
The release candidate consists of the followi
> On 9 Jan 2016, at 5:48 AM, Slow Joe wrote:
>
>> Forming a podling is difficult as if often starts with a team that
>> hasn't necessarily chosen to work together. I bet the situation > would
>> have been very different if you guys had been able to meet in
>
>> person,
>
>> but in email that's
In the past, podlings have been participating in gsoc, via the apache org
participation wich is handled by comdev pmc.
Please check the comdev website
http://community.apache.org
On Friday, January 15, 2016, Markus Geiß wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> hope this finds you well. ; o)
>
> In the past, Mif
Hey all,
hope this finds you well. ; o)
In the past, Mifos has attended GSOC as part of our outreach work for the
platform.
Since we are in incubation now (Apache Fineract), I'm wondering how we will deal
with this in the future. Is the IPMC supporting GSOC, is it the responsibility
of the
pro
Thanks, Greg.
I thought the whole point of this part of the process was that we could
assign the copyright from the original contributors to the ASF - the thing
that licenses wouldn't be covering. That's great that this isn't a sticking
point, I'm just honestly a bit confused.
On Jan 15, 2016 12:1
In the future, you MUST include the Incubation Disclaimer in your release
announcements. Unfortunately, your announcement email was moderated
through, erroneously. Please correct your procedures for your next release.
Your download page should also include the disclaimer.
Thx,
-g
On Thu, Jan 14,
Seriously? IoT can simply mean a temperature sensor in your house. No need
for a database, let alone something like Hadoop. ... that's just
over-engineering.
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Gregory Chase wrote:
> I'd recommend a PostgreSQL adaptor, which opens a huge new world.
>
> Of course, i
27 matches
Mail list logo
