The vote has finished, but I think it is important to get an SGA here.
This is exactly the issue that hung up Kylin's graduation.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Debo Dutta (dedutta)
> wrote:
> > Hi Owen
> >
> > This is good.
> >
> >
I just posted Concerted’s report to the wiki. Apologies that it is so late, but
Guarav Shukla from Concerted wrote the report a couple of days ago and wasn’t
able to post it due to lack of karma. I figured that if they’ve gone to the
effort to write the report, we might as well file it.
I also
On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
>> > Attached a patch to:
>> > 1. change from poding.i.a.o to poding.a.o
>> > 2. Require the incubator logo and that it be prominent
Thanks, Niall.
For the time being, I'm -1 and going to play devil's advocate, but I'm willing
to be persuad
On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) wrote:
> Hi Owen
>
> This is good.
>
> The SGA stuff is still in progress. Cisco is very interested in Metron and
> would like to be involved (in fact the opensrc folks at Cisco seem to be
> unaware of the Metron proposal - till we talked about
Debo,
Typically, at this point, it would be recommended to vote in additional
committers.
John
On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 8:43 PM Debo Dutta (dedutta)
wrote:
> Hi Owen
>
> This is good.
>
> The SGA stuff is still in progress. Cisco is very interested in Metron and
> would like to be involved (in f
Hi Owen
This is good.
The SGA stuff is still in progress. Cisco is very interested in Metron and
would like to be involved (in fact the opensrc folks at Cisco seem to be
unaware of the Metron proposal - till we talked about the SGA). Would it
be possible to put an addendum to the original Metro
Thanks, that is a good point.
.. Owen
On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 3:48 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Owen,
>
> I'd strongly advise you to add Metron to reporting group 1 and make the
> first report in January instead of trying to rush a report in for this
> month. The podling reports are already past
Owen,
I'd strongly advise you to add Metron to reporting group 1 and make the
first report in January instead of trying to rush a report in for this
month. The podling reports are already past due.
John
On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 4:50 PM wrote:
> Author: omalley
> Date: Sun Dec 6 21:50:16 2015
>
With 10 binding +1's and 10 non-binding +1's and no -1's, the vote to
accept Metron in the Apache Incubator passes. Thank you everyone.
Binding +1's:
Owen O'Malley
Chris Nauroth
Chris Mattmann
Seetharan Venkatesh
P. Taylor Goetz
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
Brock Noland
Billie Rinaldi
On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
>
> > Attached a patch to:
> > 1. change from poding.i.a.o to poding.a.o
> > 2. Require the incubator logo and that it be prominent
>
> Thanks, Niall. However, the general@incubato
For those who didn't work on the proposal I can assure you there is no
confusion in this incoming community over who makes the decisions.
I recommended the same model I advocate in the IPMC. The model we started with.
Champion brings the project in, is responsible if problems arise but is nt
ac
On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> Attached a patch to:
> 1. change from poding.i.a.o to poding.a.o
> 2. Require the incubator logo and that it be prominent
Thanks, Niall. However, the general@incubator list is configured to
strip attachments, so the patch didn't arrive.
The VOTE passes, with the following +1s (* indicates IPMC):
Luciano Resende*
Roman Shaposhnik*
Ross Gardler*
Brad Kolarov
Danese Cooper*
Christian Grobmeier*
Konstantin Boudnik*
Thanks for voting, everyone.
I plan to hold off on closing down the Ripple development resources
until a
Hello,
== +1 votes ==
* David Nalley (ke4qqq)
* Bruno Demion (milamber)
* Philippe Mouawad (pmouawad)
With no -1 vote, the IP Clearance for JMeter Dashboard / Report vote passes.
I will update the status page of IP Clearance to add the acceptance of
donation.
Thanks for the voters.
Milambe
Thanks for the reply ... maybe I wasn't clear enough ... I was referring to
our work prior to proposal ... we wanted our community to be in consensus
with this step b/c it also has an impact to us in a whole ... we are very
excited to join Apache and are aware of the fact that there could not be
an
On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 4:43 AM, Markus Geiß wrote:
>...
> Joining Apache, preparing the proposal, nominating the initial committers,
> and agreeing on mentors is a process governed by our community by having a
> healthy discussion and finding consensus on all of these things.
>
Please be careful
Hey all,
hope this finds you well. : o)
For now I'll leave my Jedi mind power aside:
As part of the proposing community I was following this conversation with
mixed feelings. On one side I think it is good to see some healthy
conversation about a topic, on the other side it feels a bit weird to
17 matches
Mail list logo
