Great! :)
(I admittedly clipped a clipped message so I apologize for missing
"Nobody is forcing anything.")
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Thanks, Ross. Quite true. ... and I said as much, but you[Brock] clipped
> it. Right before that "Personally, ...", I wrote this line:
Thanks, Ross. Quite true. ... and I said as much, but you[Brock] clipped
it. Right before that "Personally, ...", I wrote this line:
"Nobody is forcing anything."
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:17 AM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> Brock, I can assure you that's not Greg's style so I doubt you have
> anyth
Brock, I can assure you that's not Greg's style so I doubt you have anything to
worry about.
-Original Message-
From: Brock Noland [mailto:br...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 9:54 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)
> On
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> Personally, I am saying RTC is destructive, and am willing to give every
> podling that message.
Delivering that message by informing podlings of your experience is
completely acceptable. However, if anyone attempts to force a podling
from
-1 (binding)
Starting with RTC is a poor way to attract new community members. I'd like
to see this community use CTR instead of mandating gerrit reviews.
(ref: other-threads about lack of trust, and control issues; poor basis for
a community)
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Ralph Goers
wrote:
> -1 (binding)
> I’d like to see the project start with CTR and use RTC only for specific
> cases (like where tests must be modified, over X (1000 lines?) of code
> added, etc.
>
> Ralph
>
>
> > On Nov 24, 2015, at 2:03 PM, Henry R
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Ralph Goers
wrote:
> -1 (binding)
> I’d like to see the project start with CTR and use RTC only for specific
> cases (like where tests must be modified, over X (1000 lines?) of code
> added, etc.
>
> I must say I do find the part about achieving qual
-1 (binding)
I’d like to see the project start with CTR and use RTC only for specific cases
(like where tests must be modified, over X (1000 lines?) of code added, etc.
I must say I do find the part about achieving quality through automation
attractive, but following that up with requiring RTC l
-1 (binding)
I’d like to see the project start with CTR and use RTC only for specific cases
(like where tests must be modified, over X (1000 lines?) of code added, etc.
Ralph
> On Nov 24, 2015, at 2:03 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
>
> Hi -
>
> The [DISCUSS] thread has been quiet for a few days,
+1 (binding)
On Tuesday, November 24, 2015, Carl Steinbach wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 5:39 PM, John D. Ament >
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> > On Nov 24, 2015 14:33, "Todd Lipcon" >
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down
-1 (binding).
I'd like to see the community start with CTR, rather than mandatory reviews
via gerrit.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
> Hi -
>
> The [DISCUSS] thread has been quiet for a few days, so I think there's been
> sufficient opportunity for discussion around our
+1 (binding)
On Tuesday, November 24, 2015, Carl Steinbach wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Luke Han > wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> >
> > Best Regards!
> > -
> >
> > Luke Han
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Julien Le Dem > wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> > On 11/23/15, 8:23 AM, "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)"
> > wrote:
> >
> > >Alex,
> > >
> > >Please re-read my email. As I stated we don’t take code that
> > >authors don’t want us to have. S
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> On 11/23/15, 8:23 AM, "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)"
> wrote:
>
> >Alex,
> >
> >Please re-read my email. As I stated we don’t take code that
> >authors don’t want us to have. So far, we haven’t heard from any of
> >the authors on the incoming Kud
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> Alex,
>
> Please re-read my email. As I stated we don’t take code that
> authors don’t want us to have.
Surely it depends on how that work was licensed before the ASF?
http://www.apache.org/l
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 5:39 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> +1
> On Nov 24, 2015 14:33, "Todd Lipcon" wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like
> to
> > call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal i
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 3:32 AM, Mike Percy wrote:
> > http://45.79.81.207/archives/incubator-general/201511.mbox/thread
>
> Mike, as someone who uses the archives a lot, I really appreciate the
> functionality you've coded up. The interf
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Luke Han wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> Best Regards!
> -
>
> Luke Han
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Julien Le Dem wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Mike Percy wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, N
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:17AM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> We don’t have to hear from every author. If we don’t have an ICLA
> or SGA on file for them, we’ll remove their code from the initial
Yup, that's the concern I was trying to address by asking to reach out to the
contributors. I
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 02:00AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> The suggestion is to add it to the proposal template - that's before
> incubation starts.
I think this is a great idea!
> -Original Message-
> From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 23, 201
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:29PM, Harbs wrote:
> This kind of underscores my observation that a large part of this debate is
> driven by source control technologies.
>
> RTC seems popular for projects using Git, while CTR seems popular in
> communities using SVN.
Well, Apache Bigtop is now _offici
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 3:32 AM, Mike Percy wrote:
> Thanks Shane for the pointer! I hacked a bit on the Javascript over the
> weekend and was able to make the window panes resizable. I also added some
> keyboard shortcuts ("j", "k") to move between messages. This is what I have
> so far:
>
> http
+1
On Nov 24, 2015 14:33, "Todd Lipcon" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to
> call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal is
> pasted below and also available on the wiki at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubato
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to
> call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal is
> pasted below and also available on the wiki at:
> https://wiki.
+1 (binding)
Good luck!
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to
>> call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Inc
+1 (non-binding)
Best Regards!
-
Luke Han
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Julien Le Dem wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Edward J. Yoon
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Patrick Angeles
> > wrote:
> > > +1 (no
+1 (non-binding)
Best Regards!
-
Luke Han
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Julien Le Dem wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Mike Percy wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Henry Robinson
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I'd like to call a VOTE on tha
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Mike Percy wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Henry Robinson
> wrote:
>
> > I'd like to call a VOTE on that proposal, which is on the wiki at
> > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ImpalaProposal, and which I've pasted
> > below.
> >
> > Durin
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
> I'd like to call a VOTE on that proposal, which is on the wiki at
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ImpalaProposal, and which I've pasted
> below.
>
> During the discussion period, the proposal has been amended to add Brock
> Noland as a
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Edward J. Yoon
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Patrick Angeles
> wrote:
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Jake Farrell
> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> -Jake
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2
+1 (binding)
Good luck.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On 24 November 2015 at 09:55, Julien Le Dem wrote:
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Stack wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Hyunsik Choi wrote
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Patrick Angeles
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Jake Farrell wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> -Jake
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread s
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
> Hi -
>
> The [DISCUSS] thread has been quiet for a few days, so I think there's been
> sufficient opportunity for discussion around our proposal to bring Impala
> to the ASF Incubator.
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE on that pr
+1 from me binding
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: chris.a.mattm...@na
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Jake Farrell wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> -Jake
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like
> to
> > call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into t
+1 (non binding)
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards,
> Arvind Prabhakar
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Henry Robinson
> wrote:
>
> > Hi -
> >
> > The [DISCUSS] thread has been quiet for a few days, so I think there's
> been
> > sufficient o
+1 (binding)
-Jake
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to
> call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal is
> pasted below and also available on the wiki at:
> https:
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
> Hi -
>
> The [DISCUSS] thread has been quiet for a few days, so I think there's been
> sufficient opportunity for discussion around our proposal to bring Impala
> to the ASF Incubator.
>
> I'd like t
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
> Hi -
>
> The [DISCUSS] thread has been quiet for a few days, so I think there's
> been sufficient opportunity for discussion around our proposal to bring
> Impala to the ASF Incubator.
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE on that proposal, which is
Hi -
The [DISCUSS] thread has been quiet for a few days, so I think there's been
sufficient opportunity for discussion around our proposal to bring Impala
to the ASF Incubator.
I'd like to call a VOTE on that proposal, which is on the wiki at
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ImpalaProposal, and
+1 from me.
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
+1
Regards
JB
On 11/24/2015 08:32 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
Hi all,
Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to
call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal is
pasted below and also available on the wiki at:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubat
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:08 PM, Arvind Prabhakar
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards,
> Arvind Prabhakar
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like
> to
> > call a VOTE on a
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
>> [X] +1, accept Kudu into the Incubator
>
> (binding)
>
> Jarcec
>
>> On Nov 24, 2015, at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to
>>
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to
> call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal is
> pasted below and also available on
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to
> call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal is
> pasted below and also available on the wiki at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/in
+1 (binding)
Good luck!
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to
> call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal is
> pasted below and also available on the wiki at:
>
+1
Great to see this coming to the foundation!
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like
> > to call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu int
> [X] +1, accept Kudu into the Incubator
(binding)
Jarcec
> On Nov 24, 2015, at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to
> call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal is
> pasted below a
+1
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to
> call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal is
> pasted below and also available on the wiki at:
> https://wiki.apache.o
+1
> On Nov 24, 2015, at 11:33 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like
>> to call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal
>> is pasted
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like
> to call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal
> is pasted below and also available on the wiki at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/in
+1 (binding)
On 24 November 2015 at 09:55, Julien Le Dem wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Stack wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Hyunsik Choi wrote:
>>
>> > Hello folks,
>> >
>> > Thanks for all the feedback on the S2Graph Proposal.
>> >
Hi all,
Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to
call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal is
pasted below and also available on the wiki at:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/KuduProposal
The proposal is unchanged since the original
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Stack wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Hyunsik Choi wrote:
>
> > Hello folks,
> >
> > Thanks for all the feedback on the S2Graph Proposal.
> >
> > I would like to call for a [VOTE] on S2Graph joining the ASF as an
> > incub
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Hyunsik Choi wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> Thanks for all the feedback on the S2Graph Proposal.
>
> I would like to call for a [VOTE] on S2Graph joining the ASF as an
> incubation project.
>
> The vote is open for at least 72 hours:
>
> [ ] +1 accept S2G
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Hyunsik Choi wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> Thanks for all the feedback on the S2Graph Proposal.
>
> I would like to call for a [VOTE] on S2Graph joining the ASF as an
> incubation project.
>
> The vote is open for at least 72 hours:
>
> [ ] +1 accept S2G
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Henry Saputra
wrote:
> +1
> good luck
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Hyunsik Choi wrote:
> > Hello folks,
> >
> > Thanks for all the feedback on the S2Graph Proposal.
> >
> > I would like to call for a [VOTE] on S2Graph joining the ASF as
+1
good luck
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Hyunsik Choi wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> Thanks for all the feedback on the S2Graph Proposal.
>
> I would like to call for a [VOTE] on S2Graph joining the ASF as an
> incubation project.
>
> The vote is open for at least 72 hours:
>
> [ ] +1 accept S2Gr
Thanks Shane for the pointer! I hacked a bit on the Javascript over the
weekend and was able to make the window panes resizable. I also added some
keyboard shortcuts ("j", "k") to move between messages. This is what I have
so far:
http://45.79.81.207/archives/incubator-general/201511.mbox/thread
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Rob Vesse wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Good luck
>
> Rob
>
> On 24/11/2015 00:53, "Hyunsik Choi" wrote:
>
> >Hello folks,
> >
> >Thanks for all the feedback on the S2Graph Proposal.
> >
> >I would like to call for a [VOTE] on S2Graph joining the ASF a
+1 (binding)
Good luck
Rob
On 24/11/2015 00:53, "Hyunsik Choi" wrote:
>Hello folks,
>
>Thanks for all the feedback on the S2Graph Proposal.
>
>I would like to call for a [VOTE] on S2Graph joining the ASF as an
>incubation project.
>
>The vote is open for at least 72 hours:
>
>[ ] +1 accept S2G
I forgot to throw my +1 for S2Graph.
Here is my +1 (binding).
Best regards,
Hyunsik
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:23 PM, Seetharam Venkatesh
wrote:
> +1 binding.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 8:06 PM Byung-Gon Chun wrote:
>
>> +1 non-binding
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 12:21 PM,
The vote for releasing Apache TinkerPop 3.1.0-incubating passed with 3
binding +1s, 0 non-binding +1s, and no 0 or -1.
Binding +1s:
Daniel Gruno
Sergio Fernández
Justin Mclean
Thanks to those who were able to take the time to vote.
Justin/Sergio, will try to get LICENSE/NOTICE solid for the next
On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 07:43 +, Brian Spector wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> thanks for everyone's feedback and Sterling thank you for graciously coming
> on board as an additional mentor.
>
> I'd like to propose that the proposed Apache OpenMiracl incubation project
> be renamed to Apache Milagro.
Tha
65 matches
Mail list logo
