We're addressing issues (excluding DEPENDENCIES from rat, add missing
Apache Header) in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-423
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-422
Definitely will be fixed in the next release.
Thanks for verifying.
Best,
moon
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 3:
+1 (binding)
Forwarding from dev list
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 4:47 AM, moon soo Lee wrote:
> Hi forks,
>
> Apache Zeppelin community has voted on following RC to be releaseed
> as official Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.5-incubating release.
>
> Vote on dev list:
> http://mail-archives.apach
+1
Carrying vote over from dev list.
Thanks
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Amol Kekre wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> I too am carrying over vote from dev. Did my testing too.
>
> Thks
> Amol
>
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Justin Mclean
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Ca
The vote has passed with four +1 binding votes, and no -1s or 0s.
Jakob Homan +1 (binding)
Roman Shaposhnik +1 (binding)
Ashutosh Chauhan +1 (binding)
Justin Mclean +1 (binding)
Thanks to all who voted and took the time to look over the release!
Also, thanks Justin for your comments and clar
Hi,
> * I don't see bootstrap (./site/source/javascripts/bootstrap.js,
> ./site/source/javascripts/bootstrap.min.js) in the LICENSE file.
As this versions of bootstrap is Apache licensed there is no need to add it to
LICENSE. [1] As there is no NOTICE file nothing need to be added to NOTICE
[
Hi,
> * LICENSE file looks OK, but I don't think other LICENSE notices
> belong there. They typically belong to... NOTICE ;-)
Think they are fine as is. I’ve not run into how to handle the JSON license
before give it’s permissive it seems best to treat like the MIT or BSD license.
[1]
Thanks,
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked
- incubating in release name
- signature and hashes correct
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE good
- All source files have Apache headers
- No unexpected binary files
- Can compile from source
In the next release you may want to consider:
- placing the release ca
Hi,
+1 binding
For the source I checked:
- release names include incubating
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE good
- Source files have Apache headers (except two - see below)
- No unexpected binary files
- Can compile from source
Also checked LICENSE and NOTICE in binary which are rather
On Nov 13, 2015 4:50 PM, "Branko Čibej" wrote:
>
> On 10.11.2015 16:00, Pierre Smits wrote:
> > That is nice! Apache pages drawn up by a member of the Apache Software
> > Foundation with the input from many (both ASF members and others) and
> > hosted/communicated through ASF means, and then sayi
+1 (non-binding)
I too am carrying over vote from dev. Did my testing too.
Thks
Amol
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Carry over vote from dev list, didi all of the usual checks.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> --
Hi,
+1 (binding)
Carry over vote from dev list, didi all of the usual checks.
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Thanks Jakob, Roman, and Ashutosh. I've filed JIRAs for the issues you've
raised. We can address them in the next minor source release.
-Matt
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Ashutosh Chauhan
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Signatures & md5 matches. LICENSE & NOTICE looks good except for what Roman
+1 (binding)
Signatures & md5 matches. LICENSE & NOTICE looks good except for what Roman
& Jakob noted.
Thanks,
Ashutosh
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Matthew Hayes
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The Apache DataFu community has voted
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Matthew Hayes
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Apache DataFu community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
> Apache DataFu 1.3.0 (incubating). This is the first release since the
> project began incubating!
>
> Proposal:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod
On 2015-11-14 07:57, Brian Cho wrote:
Has this been submitted to the board yet?
No. We have to figure out how to do that :-)
It looks like Chris Mattmann's name is still not completely right
(there's an extra 's' now).
Oh well. I fixed it in the resolution draft, but mangled it in the vote
Congrats, all :)
Has this been submitted to the board yet? It looks like Chris Mattmann's
name is still not completely right (there's an extra 's' now).
-Brian
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 7:10 AM, Markus Weimer wrote:
> The vote[0] for Apache REEF to become a top-level project has passed
> with 21
> On 14 Nov 2015, at 12:47, moon soo Lee wrote:
>
> Hi forks,
>
> Apache Zeppelin community has voted on following RC to be releaseed
> as official Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.5-incubating release.
>
> Vote will be open for next 72 hours (close at 5am 17/Nov PDT).
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [
Hi forks,
Apache Zeppelin community has voted on following RC to be releaseed
as official Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.5-incubating release.
Vote on dev list:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-zeppelin-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCALf24sboheQdok1BRX1p5pT-mwY6waOfs490xiPAhT-QNCCAHg%40m
> On 13 Nov 2015, at 22:19, Matei Zaharia wrote:
>
> One question about this from the Spark side: have you considered giving the
> project a different name so that it doesn't sound like a Spark component?
> Right now "Spark Kernel" may be confused with "Spark Core" and things like
> that. I d
19 matches
Mail list logo
