Re: Resigning as a Trafodion mentor

Hi Roman, Thanks for the support! Best regards, Pierre Smits *OFBiz Extensions Marketplace* http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 4:31 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > I'd like to resign as a Trafodion mentor. You guys > still have 5 mentors left which means you won't >

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1.1 (incubating)

This vote passes with 4 binding +1s and no 0 or -1 votes: +1 Justin Mclean (binding) +1 Julian Hyde (binding) +1 Henry Saputra (binding) +1 John D. Ament (binding) Besides, we have 2 non-binding +1s: +1 Luke Han (non-binding) +1 Jian Zhong (non-binding) Thanks everyone. We’ll now roll the relea

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1.1 (incubating)

Thanks John for the suggestion, I will add it into our release document. Will send out the vote result soon. 2015-11-11 9:11 GMT+08:00 John D. Ament : > +1 binding > > A few notes: > > - Reviewed contents, licenses all look correct. > - hashes line up. > - I'd recommend that the commit you use to

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenMiracl for Incubation

On 11/10/15, 9:37 PM, "Nick Kew" wrote: >On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 04:38 +, Alex Harui wrote: > >> In case it helps, when Adobe transferred the Flex trademark to the ASF, >> the ASF licensed use of the Flex trademark back to Adobe so Adobe could >> use Flex for its already-released versions and

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenMiracl for Incubation

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Nick Kew wrote: >> The ASF project called OpenMiracl and Certivox/MIRACL continuing to use the >> MIRACL mark would seem to muddy the water between the two. Would this not >> disadvantage others building something based on OpenMiracl? > > Isn't it the same distinc

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenMiracl for Incubation

On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 04:38 +, Alex Harui wrote: > In case it helps, when Adobe transferred the Flex trademark to the ASF, > the ASF licensed use of the Flex trademark back to Adobe so Adobe could > use Flex for its already-released versions and documentation. Aha, that's interesting. The su

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenMiracl for Incubation

On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 00:35 +, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > > > On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 01:33 +, Nick Kew wrote: > > > I should like to propose that we consider OpenMiracl for incubation. > > > > This proposal is now at > > https://wiki.apache.

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenMiracl for Incubation

On 11/10/15, 4:35 PM, "Niall Pemberton" wrote: > >"As soon as OpenMiracl is accepted into the Incubator, Certivox (now >MIRACL) will transfer the source code and trademark to the ASF with a >Software Grant, and licensed under the Apache License 2.0. Certivox/MIRACL >retains rights to its existin

Resigning as a Trafodion mentor

Hi! I'd like to resign as a Trafodion mentor. You guys still have 5 mentors left which means you won't even notice me disappearing ;-) Best of luck with the rest of the incubation. Thanks, Roman. P.S. I'll update the xml tomorrow. ---

Re: Draft report November 2015 -- please review

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Ate Douma wrote: > In this case, their first challenge clearly indicates making a next release > with also providing convenience binary artifacts is seen as the next hurdle > to take. It is true AsterixDB already put out two releases, but those were > source only

Re: Draft report November 2015 -- please review

On 2015-11-10 23:59, Marvin Humphrey wrote: On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Ate Douma wrote: On 2015-11-09 18:12, Marvin Humphrey wrote: Incubator PMC report for November 2015 * Ready to graduate - AsterixDB While IMO AsterixDB is doing great, it is not yet considering graduation s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1.1 (incubating)

+1 binding A few notes: - Reviewed contents, licenses all look correct. - hashes line up. - I'd recommend that the commit you use to vote on is the one that includes the tagging, so https://github.com/apache/incubator-kylin/commit/6a9499b4d0fabb54211a8a536c2e18d3fe8b4a5d should probably be voted

Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)

Removing them seems reasonable. They are only used as part of a test-case, which is only accessed if someone is developing using the hosted editor. I shall do this as part of the next release. Ali On 10 November 2015 at 23:44, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > >>> Do you have the authors permission

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenMiracl for Incubation

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 01:33 +, Nick Kew wrote: > > I should like to propose that we consider OpenMiracl for incubation. > > This proposal is now at > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenMiraclProposal "As soon as OpenMiracl is accepted i

Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)

Hi, >> Do you have the authors permission to use and distribute them? > > I have no information on the original taker of the photo. Perhaps these were missed as part of the IP clearance step? [1] As the provenance is a little unclear I’d suggest they be replaced, but up to you. Thanks, Justin

Re: Draft report November 2015 -- please review

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Ate Douma wrote: > On 2015-11-09 18:12, Marvin Humphrey wrote: >> >> Incubator PMC report for November 2015 >> >> * Ready to graduate >> >>- AsterixDB > > > While IMO AsterixDB is doing great, it is not yet considering graduation so > I think it shouldn't be l

Re: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation

This is an interesting topic, and one that is broader than just Apache Sentry (incubating). Even so, I want to praise Joe Brockmeier for raising it, and the comments -especially those from Greg Stein and Rich Bowen and Marvin Humphrey for making me think more about this. * In any project with a

Re: Draft report November 2015 -- please review

On 2015-11-09 18:12, Marvin Humphrey wrote: Incubator PMC report for November 2015 * Ready to graduate - AsterixDB While IMO AsterixDB is doing great, it is not yet considering graduation so I think it shouldn't be listed as such. Ate (AsterixDB mentor)

Re: Instructions for granting podling members karma

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:22 AM, sebb wrote: > Huh? > > The point is that podlings should be encouraged to manage things for > themselves where possible. > [If every karma change had to be managed by Infra then it could add a > lot to their workload.] On a very much related note: I'd like to give

Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)

Hi Justin, >> Are you referring to the screenshots under war/static/? Those are >> untouched since the migration from Google, so fall under the license >> from them. > > Not the screen shots no but the photos found in here: > ./src/org/waveprotocol/wave/client/editor/harness/public/pics/ > > Do yo

Re: Instructions for granting podling members karma

Huh? The point is that podlings should be encouraged to manage things for themselves where possible. [If every karma change had to be managed by Infra then it could add a lot to their workload.] For podlings to do that, they need to have the relevant information. My question is: where should tha

Re: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation

That is nice! Apache pages drawn up by a member of the Apache Software Foundation with the input from many (both ASF members and others) and hosted/communicated through ASF means, and then saying that those 'are not Foundation'. And that by/through the fingers of a fellow board member That do

Re: Instructions for granting podling members karma

Nah... Don't worry. It is a guideline... Pierre Smits *OFBiz Extensions Marketplace* http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 3:18 PM, sebb wrote: > There have been several requests to Infra recently to grant karma for > podling members. > > In most cases this can be dealt with by

Re: Draft report November 2015 -- please review

That made me remember: Homer Simpson : [sarcastic voice] Ooh, look at me! I'm making people happy! I'm the Magical Man from Happy-Land, in a gumdrop house on Lollipop Lane! Best regards, Pierre Smits *OFBiz Extensions Marketplace* http://oem.

Re: Draft report November 2015 -- please review

Hello, >> TinkerPop > >> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be >> aware of? >> >> No. Recently, we have really appreciated Daniel Gruno's (mentor) efforts >> to get our development community more connected by setting up an Apache >> HipChat account for us and i

Instructions for granting podling members karma

There have been several requests to Infra recently to grant karma for podling members. In most cases this can be dealt with by the PPMC/IPMC by editting the asf-auth file However I could not find any details in the Incubator guides about this. I added the following section to the PMC guide: htt

Re: Releases during incubation?

It has to do with intent: is your intention to release outside of the Incubator and the ASF because you don't want to do the work to make them compliant, or are you releasing for the benefit of your existing user base so they don't have to rewrite their code (package rename?), or get some security/

Re: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation

On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 3:26 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 7:28 AM, Lenni Kuff wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > > > > > PMC membership has nothing to do with technical mastery of the > codebase, > > > which > > > is why I cringe every time

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenMiracl for Incubation

On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 01:33 +, Nick Kew wrote: > I should like to propose that we consider OpenMiracl for incubation. This proposal is now at https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenMiraclProposal -- Nick Kew - To unsubscrib

Re: Releases during incubation?

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > ...Subversion cut a release while in incubation on their old system Wicket is another example that made a few non-Apache releases during incubation. As long as it's very clear which releases are which, and the goal is to quickly move to