+1.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 7:32 AM Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Serge Huber wrote:
> > ...we will use the Wiki text for the official incubation text...
>
> Well, this is the official incubation text ;-)
>
> So here are the diffs between that JB posted at the to
Hi Colin,
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache HTrace 4.0.1-incubating
- verified mds and signature
- ran "mvn install" without test failure (on correct Maven version)
- ran "mvn package -Pnative" without test failure in htrace-c
All notices and LICENSE look good to me.
This is a IPMC binding V
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Serge Huber wrote:
> ...we will use the Wiki text for the official incubation text...
Well, this is the official incubation text ;-)
So here are the diffs between that JB posted at the top of this thread
and the current state of the wiki, as per
http://wiki.apach
+1 from me
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
W
+1
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 5:14 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> following the discussion about Unomi, I would like to call a vote for
> accepting Unomi as a new incubator project.
>
> The proposal text is included below, and available on the wiki:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
Thanks Raul for the clarification. JB used the original email as the base for
the text proposal but we will use the Wiki text for the official incubation
text, no worries.
Regards,
Serge…
> On 23 sept. 2015, at 12:45, Raul Kripalani wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding).
>
> Note: My name as an ini
+1 (non-binding).
Note: My name as an initial committer is on the wiki but not in this VOTE.
Raúl.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> following the discussion about Unomi, I would like to call a vote for
> accepting Unomi as a new incubator project.
>
>
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> following the discussion about Unomi, I would like to call a vote for
> accepting Unomi as a new incubator project
+1
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: gene
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks JB for starting the vote !
cheers,
Serge…
> On 23 sept. 2015, at 11:14, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> following the discussion about Unomi, I would like to call a vote for
> accepting Unomi as a new incubator project.
>
> The proposal text is include
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 09/23/2015 11:14 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi all,
following the discussion about Unomi, I would like to call a vote for
accepting Unomi as a new incubator project.
The proposal text is included below, and available on the wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubato
Hi all,
following the discussion about Unomi, I would like to call a vote for
accepting Unomi as a new incubator project.
The proposal text is included below, and available on the wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/UnomiProposal
The discussion thread about Unomi is available here:
http://
Le 23/09/15 08:45, Bertrand Delacretaz a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Henry Saputra
> wrote:
>> ...you should not worry too much about having the project to be in
>> incubator forever...
> That's assuming the community grows.
>
> https://github.com/easymock/easymock/graphs/c
Thanks for the follow up response, Bertrand.
Building community is hard work. Apologize if I my previous comment
sounded like it magically will happen.
Not all potential open source projects are perfectly suitable in the
ASF, so it is totally fair and welcomed to test the water for possible
commu
13 matches
Mail list logo