Hi Justin,
I've filed CALCITE-860 and CALCITE-861 to address the issues you
identified. We'll be sure to get them addressed for the next release.
Thanks for reviewing the release and voting.
Jacques
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +0 (binding) and please fix up
Hi,
+0 (binding) and please fix up the licensing issues for the next release.
Checked:
- Release file name includes incubating
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE has some issues (see below), but all licenses involved are permissive
and Apache compatable.
- NOTICE ok
- No unexpected binary files
- Can
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- signatures and hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exits
- LICENSE and NOTICE good
- No unexpected binary files
- All source files have headers
- Can compile from source
Minor thing to consider changing is signing the release with an Apache email
address.
Thanks,
Justin
--
Txs for clarifying Marvin, we gonna report next month, ok?
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 29.08.2015 um 00:28 schrieb Marvin Humphrey :
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 9:12 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>> I believe the BatchEE podling is incorrectly set to monthly reports.
>>
>> If I look at the schedule, they s
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> I would much prefer a smaller list of initial committers who have been
>> identified as having experience or a solid potential to be ASF
>> committers, and let others be elected based on merit as the project
>> progresses.
>
> I would agr
On 8/28/15 8:53 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Dennis this is now triple posted including one private list. I
> request you no longer contact me directly as I thought I was replying
> privately to our prior conversation and would have moderated some of
> my language. BTW what I wrote has NOTHING to do wi
