[VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.1-incubating release

Due to last fixes, I'd like to release a 0.9.1-incubating for johnzon. Vote passed on johnzon project so time to vote on general@ (see http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-johnzon-dev/201508.mbox/%3CCACLE%3D7NjEHG1wMd6gG0ktrXA_Jszv8GVVabEfzfiDH%3DQGgrmuw%40mail.gmail.com%3E for johnzo

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.1-incubating release

Yes please share it on general. John On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:07 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > So vote passed with 3 +1 IPMC bindings votes and 2 +1 non IPMC votes. > > @incubator: do we need another vote on general@ since we already got 3 > IPMC > +1? > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.1-incubating release

So vote passed with 3 +1 IPMC bindings votes and 2 +1 non IPMC votes. @incubator: do we need another vote on general@ since we already got 3 IPMC +1? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Github

Re: [DISCUSS] Horn Incubation Proposal

More diverse volunteers for Horn project will be added, from cldi-kaist team who is ranked 7th in the ImageNet ILSVRC last year. We're also seeking one more mentor (instead of me). Thanks. P.S., I'm CC'ing current volunteers. If you're still not on the list please subscribe so you can see what's

Re: IP clearance template - tweak sanity check

On Sat, 22 Aug 2015, Craig L Russell wrote: Nice work. Just one comment, typo “form” should be “for”. Original: If recorded in the cclas.txt document, use the company name (field 2 without submitter name) and the form name (field 4, without any people's names). Proposed: If recorded in the ccl

Re: BatchEE Report - why are they monthly

Txs John for bringing this up! BatchEE is indeed not doing too well from a comunity aspect. The code base is pretty mature and we have quite a few folks who know the codebase and keep working on it. But it might be better if we think about not graduating to a TLP but to a subproject e.g. of Ger

RE: What is the legal basis for enforcing release policies at ASF?

In my opinion, yes. I reserve the right to change my mind based on further input from others ;-) Sent from my Windows Phone From: Roman Shaposhnik Sent: ‎8/‎25/‎2015 12:32 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org

RE: apache binary distributions

Probably best to ask the specific question about brand on the trademarks@ list. -Original Message- From: shaposh...@gmail.com [mailto:shaposh...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Roman Shaposhnik Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 11:52 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: Dennis Hamilton Subject: