Cool.
I can't find info on "how much" it costs ASF, any pointers before embarking
on 100+ artifact signing spree... ;-)
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:35 AM, William A Rowe Jr
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Niclas Hedhman
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 1:06 AM, William A Rowe Jr
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> this is one of those blind spot things I can't even explain. I was so sure
> Drill was implemented in C/C++ that I never bothered to check. I'm now
> curios as to who may have implanted that false memory (did you guys
> talk about when it
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 1:46 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 5:14 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> ...
>> == External Dependencies ==...
>
> There's some GPL/LGPL stuff in there, IMO the proposal should include
> a plan for coping with those.
Can you help me understand whi
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 3:00 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Is Madlib even viable as an independent project?
Yes it is extremely viable. There's been a number of prototypes of porting
MADlib to other SQL-on-Hadoop projects (Impala is the one I know of)
and also quite a bit of activity on the PostgreSQL
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 2:54 AM, Christian Tzolov
wrote:
> Is PXF (HAWQ extension framework) going to be managed together with the
> HAWQ ASF project or as a child one?
For now it is part of the same codebase managed by the same community.
If it gets
picked up by other communities we may start as
Hi Ted!
this is one of those blind spot things I can't even explain. I was so sure
Drill was implemented in C/C++ that I never bothered to check. I'm now
curios as to who may have implanted that false memory (did you guys
talk about when it was first getting designed?).
But anyway, more to the po
[Failing at dealing with this cross-posted and variously-branched discussion on
two lists, so I am doing it too. Also OT with respect to Ross's declaration,
but it has to do with the fact that "release" is not so well distinguished as
one might hope.]
Minor nit? #1:
Generally, because of wha
>
> They do? This is the statement of the VP Legal, so whether it is right or
> wrong, here at the ASF we attempt to honor the 'spirit' of the policy of
> other licensors when we use their code, and we would hope others would
> honor the 'spirit' of our policies here. It that is the underlying
>
Jim already addressed this in an overlapping email. I tried to address it but
it seems quibbling over individual words describing process was more important
than understanding the intended message. So let me try again, this time using
the corrected words in my email and adding Jim's further clar
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> > On Aug 20, 2015, at 11:19 PM, William A Rowe Jr
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> A snapshot is not a release. Licenses "kick in" at distribution/
> >> release.
> >>
> >
> > Lets just
> On Aug 20, 2015, at 11:19 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>>
>> A snapshot is not a release. Licenses "kick in" at distribution/
>> release.
>>
>
> Lets just imagine if Jim, VP Legal is actually correct in his
> interpretation, and
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> > On Aug 20, 2015, at 8:27 PM, William A Rowe Jr
> wrote:
> >
> > On Aug 20, 2015 08:52, "Jim Jagielski" wrote:
> >>
> >> Coming in late.
> >>
> >> A snapshot is not a release. Licenses "kick in" at distribution/
> >> release.
> >
> > I
> On Aug 20, 2015, at 10:23 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Coming in late.
>>
>> A snapshot is not a release. Licenses "kick in" at distribution/
>> release.
>
> Are you sure? When you have a public source control repo, with a
> LICENS
> On Aug 20, 2015, at 8:27 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
> On Aug 20, 2015 08:52, "Jim Jagielski" wrote:
>>
>> Coming in late.
>>
>> A snapshot is not a release. Licenses "kick in" at distribution/
>> release.
>
> I want to fix FUD before it infests the rafters and subfloor. I really
> hav
> On Aug 20, 2015, at 10:16 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>
>> This thread started as a discussion of Linux distros and trademarks.
>> Perhaps I could try to return it there?
>>
>> If a distro takes a release of Apache X, compiles
On Aug 21, 2015 1:54 AM, "Greg Stein" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
> >...
>
> > So, in the strictest sense, distributions that make minor changes for
> > their distribution should call it Bar powered by Apache Foo in order to
> > differentiate it from an offic
All,
I've completed the last few report manager steps for August 2015 - updated
the clutch, wiki, etc. The next report has a high number of podlings that
I'll probably try to rebalance, but any additional volunteers from the
community to help shepherd podlings would be great.
http://wiki.apache.
Is Madlib even viable as an independent project?
Should it be part of the overall Hawq project?
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I would like to start a discussion on accepting HAWQ
> into ASF Incubator. The proposal is available at:
> https://wiki.apache
Is PXF (HAWQ extension framework) going to be managed together with the
HAWQ ASF project or as a child one?
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 5:14 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> ...
> > == External Dependencies ==...
>
> There's some GPL/LGPL
19 matches
Mail list logo
