Of course there are...
CD40 - podlings may not have this prior to coming ASF, hence the full
history might not be available.
RE40 - interesting clause in itself, both the "can be" and the caveat in it
"no guarantee". IMHO, shouldn't be there at all.
QU20 - Highly subjective as noted in footnote
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> I honestly see no problem with that, again provided that the artifact can
NOT
> be confused with the one coming from Apache project.
I think the "problem" lies in Trademarks. Debian's Tomcat7 is labeled
"Servlet and JSP engine" and its To
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> >> Let us put that last part a step up... Let us assume someone takes one
> of
> >> the released sources of one of the java projects out there, makes maven
> >> artifacts out of it and publishes them at maven central. Is that ok? I
> mean
> On Aug 5, 2015, at 5:44 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
>>
>>> It was also mentioned here, that for example publishing snapshot builds to
>>> maven central is not allowed. I guess i
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> Am 03.08.2015 21:46, schrieb David Nalley:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Jochen Theodorou
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> some of the general discussion recently made me wonder about one point
>>> with
>>> regards to binary distr
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
>
>> It was also mentioned here, that for example publishing snapshot builds to
>> maven central is not allowed. I guess in the release document they are
>> basically to be handled as nigh
I would like to start a discussion on DataTorrent's core engine and its
operators joining the ASF as an incubating project under the name Apex.
The proposal is available on the wiki here:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ApexProposal
The text of the proposal is also available at the end of this
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:24 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
> wrote:
>> ...I understand the maturity model to be something to aspire to and that
>> Apache Projects
>> will always be working toward it. I mean TLPs, not podlings, altho
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> Roman Shaposhnik wrote in reply to jan i:
>
>> I'm not aware of any policy like that. That said, I'd say the rule in my book
>> is very close to Linux packaging guidelines. Open source software *must*
>> be bootsrappable from source using *o
jan i wrote:
>> I want to make sure I have not overlooked a policy or rule.
Corinthia is not required to be compatible with any particular platform.
Consider why this is desirable: one might provide open source code which only
works with a proprietary compiler, and then someone else might take yo
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 1:50 PM, jan i wrote:
> On 5 August 2015 at 22:46, Dennis E. Hamilton
> wrote:
>
>> I don't have an answer about tooling with respect to the need for
>> widely-available tools. If the concern is for ability to use free tools on
>> Windows, but there are alternatives to req
On 5 August 2015 at 22:46, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> I don't have an answer about tooling with respect to the need for
> widely-available tools. If the concern is for ability to use free tools on
> Windows, but there are alternatives to requiring an expensive commercial
> IDE for users while s
I don't have an answer about tooling with respect to the need for
widely-available tools. If the concern is for ability to use free tools on
Windows, but there are alternatives to requiring an expensive commercial IDE
for users while still taking advantage of the Microsoft development tool chai
Hi.
We have recently (again) on different list discussed third party libraries.
Some strong
opinions have been aired.
So we have rules/policies for libraries but how about tooling, I have not
been able to
find any "do not do this" page.
I am about to prepare a release for Corinthia, which is a C
OK, thanks Bertrand. My recollection of the maturity-model discussion was that
it is about an ideal state and not some gate, and that projects would always be
correcting their state toward that defined in the model. I confirm that the
current document simply characterizes what the state is for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello,
The Apache Taverna Incubator PPMC has voted +5 to release
Apache Taverna Parent 1-incubating (RC4)
Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating (RC4)
Incubator PMC members please review and vote on this incubator release.
Apache Taverna Langu
Done.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015, at 09:59 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> The userid is RalphGoers.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Aug 4, 2015, at 5:41 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Ralph Goers
> >> wrote:
> >> For some reason I am not able to edit any pages on the incubator wik
The userid is RalphGoers.
Ralph
> On Aug 4, 2015, at 5:41 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Ralph Goers
>> wrote:
>> For some reason I am not able to edit any pages on the incubator wiki. I
>> could swear I used to be able to do that. Does someone have karma t
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:24 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> ...I understand the maturity model to be something to aspire to and that
> Apache Projects
> will always be working toward it. I mean TLPs, not podlings, although
> podlings should be
> aware of it and also aspire to it...
I don
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> ...I may misunderstand or have lost track of how that's handled in all the
> discussion...
you're not alone - IMO the only way such proposals can work is based
on a concise wiki page that explains the proposal and gives everybody
a single re
20 matches
Mail list logo
