On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 5:56 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> We've explored gerrit 2-3 times in the past 24 months. We have seen
> several projects request it over the years. As I've mentioned
> elsewhere in this thread, our most recent exploration was in December,
> and there are a number of issues th
Thanks!
2015-07-15 3:23 GMT+09:00 Marvin Humphrey :
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Kengo Seki wrote:
> > Can someone please grant me write access to the incubator wiki under the
> > user name KengoSeki?
> > I'd like to participate in "Additional Interested Contributors" section
> in
> > the
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Till Westmann wrote:
>
> On 14 Jul 2015, at 15:31, David Nalley wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Ian Maxon wrote:
>>
>>> We use Gerrit as
>>> a tool to do code reviews and to organize the commits, as well as to
>>> facilitate easy testing. However that
Hi Incubators,
Yes -- I even bug myself.
Can any other "binders" review the release, please?
Thank you very much,
Marko.
http://markorodriguez.com
On Jul 13, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> For the source releases I checked:
> - incubating in artefact name
>
Hey Till
All commits must occur against the ASF codebase and can not be mirrored
over from a different location (this includes Github, Gerrit, etc.). This
is a mandate that has come from the board level and is not a negotiable
item.
Gerrit has been discussed many times before and each time the ans
On 14 Jul 2015, at 15:31, David Nalley wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Ian Maxon wrote:
We use Gerrit as
a tool to do code reviews and to organize the commits, as well as to
facilitate easy testing. However that's all it's used for- we still
clone from repositories that come downstre
+1 binding
On Jul 13, 2015 09:45, "Matt Gilman" wrote:
> Hello
>
> The Apache NiFi PPMC has voted to release Apache NiFi 0.2.0-incubating. The
> vote was based on the release candidate and thread described below. We now
> request the IPMC to vote on this release.
>
> Here is the PPMC voting resul
+1 (binding)
* Verified signatures and checksums
* git tag matches with source distribution
* top level files look good
* sources compile and test correctly
* rat check looks good
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Matt Gilman
wrote:
> Hello
>
> The Apache NiFi PPMC ha
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- release contains incubating
- hashes and signatures correct
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE correct
- All source file shave headers
- No unexpected binaries in source release
- Can compile from source
Other minor issues:
- please place RC in correct place
(h
+1 Justin (binding)
+1 John (binding)
+1 Dave (binding)
That makes three +1 votes and no negative votes.
Vote passes. I will move the release to the mirrors.
Thanks to all who helped developed and review this release!
- Dave
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 5:17 PM Dave wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> On Sa
+1 binding
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 7:32 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> I checked:
> - incubating in release name
> - DISCLAIMER exits
> - LICENSE and NOTICE good
> - No unexpected binary files
> - All source files have headers
> - Can compile from source
>
> Would be nice to ha
+1 (binding)
Although the L&N files are a valid concern, I don't see it should be blocking
this critical security fix release. However, please make sure to get it fixed
the time around.
Thanks
Cos
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:33AM, Cédric Champeau wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> The Apache Groovy PPMC has
+1 (binding)
> On Jul 13, 2015, at 10:23 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> my +1 (Binding), for the source package.
>
> Addressing Justin's issues :
>
> There *are* issues, but considering the security issue fixed in this
> release, I'd rather have this version out.
>
> - The build sc
This vote passes with 3 binding +1 and no -1.
We will check on the NOTICE for the next release.
Thanks for voting!
--
Gianmarco
On 13 July 2015 at 11:49, amareshwarisr . wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Verified signature and checksums
> - Top level LICENSE seems fine. I'm not sure NOTICE is correc
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Kengo Seki wrote:
> Can someone please grant me write access to the incubator wiki under the
> user name KengoSeki?
> I'd like to participate in "Additional Interested Contributors" section in
> the YetusProposal page. Thanks.
Done. Sorry for the lag.
Marvin Hum
+1 (binding)
Verified checksum, signature on src/bin. Built package target from
source. NOTICE/LICENSE/DISCLAIMER present, but I only did a cursory
check of the dependencies.
The DEPENDENCIES file at the top level of the source tarball is empty. -C
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Jaideep Dhok
Thanks all for voting!
Just to follow up on the suggestions from this thread:
We will update README for the jdk and maven requirements:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-801
@Justin: We can compile with "mvn install -DskipTests" as specified in the
README.
Regards,
On Mon, Jul 13, 2
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Ian Maxon wrote:
>> This is pretty far from what the norm is, and is being proposed by a
>> podling, so I'd expect some skepticism. Other podlings, have proposed
>> similar workflows (albeit with extra problems.) and were not allowed
>> to retain that procedure.
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
