While this is all true, there is a key point in the policy that should be
considered [1].
“Will the majority of users want to use my product without adding the optional
components”?
So if a Language Module is required and BerkeleyLM is so substandard that no
one will really use it, then you
+1(agreeing with P. Taylor)
On Jun 21, 2015 6:16 PM, "P. Taylor Goetz" wrote:
> Dave,
>
> I would think just sending out a correction on this thread with a link to
> the correct commit should suffice.
>
> Bonus points for filing a JIRA to fix the issue and providing a link to
> that as well. :)
>
Dave,
I would think just sending out a correction on this thread with a link to the
correct commit should suffice.
Bonus points for filing a JIRA to fix the issue and providing a link to that as
well. :)
-Taylor
> On Jun 21, 2015, at 5:40 PM, Dave wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> Thanks for your a
Hi John,
Thanks for your attention to to deal. I think the commit you suggest is the
perfect commit for the release, but the one listed in the email is the same
except for a meaningless change to the CHANGELOG file. We should change
that release script to pick the exact right commit, but I would n
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 7:03 AM, jan i wrote:
> First thanks for taking care of getting our podlings onboard, they are the
> future of ASF and therefore really important.
Indeed. Here's a tracking page I've created:
https://wiki.apache.org/apachecon/ACEU15Incubator
Let the sign-ups begin!
>
