I can get it tonight. This last week has been crazy.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 14, 2015, at 20:36, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>
> Hi, Ted,
>
> Do you need someone else to finish and file the report?
>
> Marvin Humphrey
>
> --
Wow, thank you so much to all of you for the great feedback you have provided
about this proposal and specifically about the community concerns (thank you
Martin for raising this topic, it was good to address this here after it was
briefly discussed at Apache Barcamp@Austin), license, releases:
Hi, Ted,
Do you need someone else to finish and file the report?
Marvin Humphrey
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On 14 June 2015 at 17:52, Joe Witt wrote:
> The community agreed on what we posted originally. Just trying to be
> responsive to niclas concerns in the spirit of the discussion thread.
>
I was not suggesting otherwise.
>
> I have forwarded the thread to our dev list which is where the adjustmen
The community agreed on what we posted originally. Just trying to be
responsive to niclas concerns in the spirit of the discussion thread.
I have forwarded the thread to our dev list which is where the adjustment
to 'interactive' came from. Should these minor rephrasings give pause in
the nifi c
Hi
Sorry for top posting, I do understand why the resolution is being changed,
however it this
really the correct place to do it. The community must be behind and
agreeing to the resolution,
so changes should in my opinion by discussed on your dev@ list.
The IPMC should be presented with a resolu
Adjusted to clarify the 'realtime' reference which can be misleading:
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
Committee charged with the creation and maint
It is less generic, but I think I am not in a position to determine what is
suitable. The community + mentors should be a better group to discuss it.
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Joe Witt wrote:
> Niclas,
>
> I agree that the scope could be improved. It is a tough balancing act
> of course.
Niclas,
I agree that the scope could be improved. It is a tough balancing act
of course. How would about this modification:
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Mana
