Hi!
my recollection is that the collective opinion
was to discourage the use of KEYS of robots
for signing the releases and prefer individuals
do that with their keys.
I remember a thread to that effect, but I cant
google it. Am I misremembering?
Thanks,
Roman.
-
Hi!
Groovy is currently voting a release where exactly
the same issue as LEGAL-171 got raised. Their
tarball currently contains the file in question:
buildSrc/src/main/java/JavadocFixTool.java
with the LICENSE described in LEGAL-171.
My understanding is that this file should NOT
be redistribu
Hash files look good
Signature look good
Source download and compiled
Looks like not 3rd party exes
DISCLAIMER file looks good
NOTICE and LICENSE files look good
+1 (binding)
Congrats guys!
- Henry
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 12:49 AM, Luke Han wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Apache Kylin community has
+1 (binding)
1. Built under jdk-1.8/OS-X 10.10.3;
2. Checked hash & signature
3. Ran tests
Thanks
JiangXu
-- --
??: "Luke Han";;
: 2015??6??8??(??) 10:28
??: "general";
: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin-0.7.1-incubating
Thank you everybody to vote our first release, please let's know more about
your idea and feedback,
We really would love to learn more and sharp our coming features and
releases.
Thanks.
Luke
Best Regards!
-
Luke Han
2015-06-07 18:19 GMT-07:00 Shi, Shaofeng :
> +1 (bindin
I've submitted my shepherd report for log4cxx2.
While researching the project, I found that they do not have (as far as I can
tell) a private mailing list aside from priv...@logging.apache.org.
How are they having private discussions (I.e. Inviting new committers, etc.)?
-Taylor
+1 (binding),
Checked the package hash, compiled source code, and passed unit tests;
On 6/7/15, 3:49 PM, "Luke Han" wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>The Apache Kylin community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
>Apache Kylin 0.7.1 (incubating), the first release of Apache Kylin.
>
>Since this is
+1
all looks good.
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 3:49 AM Luke Han wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Apache Kylin community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
> Apache Kylin 0.7.1 (incubating), the first release of Apache Kylin.
>
> Since this is first release after join Apache Incubating project, w
+1
Checked signatures
Compiled from source
Cheers
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 6:40 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> I checked:
> - release name includes incubating
> - signatures and hashes correct
> - DISCLAIMER exists
> - LICENSE and NOTICE all good
> - All source files have apac
Yeah has something to do with svnpubsub etc I bet. Had the same
problem with the OODT website and notified infra and filed
an issue. Also talked to ChrisL in HipChat.
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Sc
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 12:25 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> I made some updates to the Ignite status page, built the site locally
> without errors, checked the updates, committed and published the site
> through https://cms.apache.org/incubator/publish .
>
> But the updates aren't showing up on the pub
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- release name includes incubating
- signatures and hashes correct
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE all good
- All source files have apache headers
- No unexpected binary files in release
- Can compile from source
Also thanks for looking into and fixing the dict
Hi all,
The Apache Kylin community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
Apache Kylin 0.7.1 (incubating), the first release of Apache Kylin.
Since this is first release after join Apache Incubating project, we would
like to hear more feedback from incubator community and please help to
I made some updates to the Ignite status page, built the site locally
without errors, checked the updates, committed and published the site
through https://cms.apache.org/incubator/publish .
But the updates aren't showing up on the public site. I don't know where
to look for logs. Any ideas?
-- B
14 matches
Mail list logo
