Re: [VOTE] Accept Trafodion into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Stack wrote: > Following the discussion earlier in the thread [1], I would like to call a > VOTE to accept Trafodion as a new Apache Incubator project. > > The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached to this > mail. > > The VOT

Re: [VOTE] Accept Trafodion into Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) -Anoop- On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Chris Nauroth wrote: > +1 (binding) > > --Chris Nauroth > > > > > On 5/19/15, 2:27 PM, "Stack" wrote: > > >Following the discussion earlier in the thread [1], I would like to call a > >VOTE to accept Trafodion as a new Apache Incubator

Re: [VOTE] Accept Trafodion into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) --Chris Nauroth On 5/19/15, 2:27 PM, "Stack" wrote: >Following the discussion earlier in the thread [1], I would like to call a >VOTE to accept Trafodion as a new Apache Incubator project. > >The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached to this >mail. > >The

Re: [VOTE] Accept Trafodion into Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) -Dan On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Stack wrote: > Following the discussion earlier in the thread [1], I would like to call a > VOTE to accept Trafodion as a new Apache Incubator project. > > The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached to this > mail. >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache REEF 0.11.0-incubating

On 2015-05-19 18:14, Jakob Homan wrote: > - headers are correct (I assume for the ps* files there are technical > requirements for the script metadata to come before the license?) Yes, it is used by PowerShell to generate the -help message and enable command line tab completion. Thanks for testin

RE: [VOTE] Accept Trafodion into Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) -Original Message- From: saint@gmail.com [mailto:saint@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Stack Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 2:58 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Accept Trafodion into Apache Incubator Following the discussion earlier in the thread [1], I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache REEF 0.11.0-incubating

+1 (binding) - sig/md5 sum are good - tests pass - mvn installs - headers are correct (I assume for the ps* files there are technical requirements for the script metadata to come before the license?) - license and notice are correct. -Jakob On 19 May 2015 at 16:50, Markus Weimer wrote: > On 2015

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 1.1.0 release (RC5)

On 20.05.2015 00:44, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +0 (binding) from me until these 2 issues are resolved. Of course other IPMC > members may vote differently. > > Several bundled files have GPL license headers e.g. ./ipc/shmem/config.guess, > ./ipc/shmem/ltmain.sh etc. While these look like aut

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 1.1.0 release (RC5)

On 20.05.2015 00:44, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +0 (binding) from me until these 2 issues are resolved. Of course other IPMC > members may vote differently. > > Several bundled files have GPL license headers e.g. ./ipc/shmem/config.guess, > ./ipc/shmem/ltmain.sh etc. While these look like aut

Re: [VOTE] Accept Trafodion into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding). Enis On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Stack wrote: > Following the discussion earlier in the thread [1], I would like to call a > VOTE to accept Trafodion as a new Apache Incubator project. > > The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached to this > mail. > > T

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache REEF 0.11.0-incubating

On 2015-05-19 16:03, Justin Mclean wrote: > - No unexpected binary files (although there are some Microsoft > Visual Studio files in the release - should they be there?) Yes. the .sln and .csproj files are the correspondence to the pom.xml in the Maven world. Without them, you can't build the soft

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache REEF 0.11.0-incubating

Hi, +1 binding I checking: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes correct - DISCLAIMER exits - LICENSE and NOTICE correct - All source files have apache headers - No unexpected binary files (although there are some Microsoft Visual Studio files in the release - should they be there?) - Can

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 1.1.0 release (RC5)

Hi, +0 (binding) from me until these 2 issues are resolved. Of course other IPMC members may vote differently. Several bundled files have GPL license headers e.g. ./ipc/shmem/config.guess, ./ipc/shmem/ltmain.sh etc. While these look like auto generated build files but I'm not sure that they ca

Re: [DISCUSS] Trafodion Incubation Proposal

Proposal looks good. Please include me as mentor. Thanks

[VOTE] Accept Trafodion into Apache Incubator

Following the discussion earlier in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Trafodion as a new Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached to this mail. The VOTE is open for at least the next 72 hours: [ ] +1 accept Trafodion into th

Re: You know what... Apache is just too complicated.

> On 19 May 2015, at 10:43, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: >>> On 19 May 2015, at 08:18, Bertrand Delacretaz >>> wrote: >>> ...The http://incubator.apache.org/ are way too verbose in my opinion, >>> and often mix best practices with p

Re: You know what... Apache is just too complicated.

> Lots of rules, Americans in the background... I don’t see that it works. Actually Apache folks are pretty much spread around the world. There are a lot of us in Austria, Germany, France, Spain, Italia, Poland, etc > All you'd have to do is connect programmers to projects. Simple. Why all > the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Open CRM

On Tue, 19 May 2015, shibasis sengupta wrote: Only catch is, its developed using .NET - does ASF consider .NET projects? Of course! While we do have quite a lot of Java projects these days, there are no language restrictions in place on incubating or graduated projects, and all languages wher

Re: You know what... Apache is just too complicated.

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > > > If someone wants to write a "12 steps to becoming an Apache top-level > > project" that might become the single-page Incubator website ;-) > > Isn't it 1 step nowaday

Re: You know what... Apache is just too complicated.

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: >>> On 19 May 2015, at 08:18, Bertrand Delacretaz >>> wrote: >>> ...The http://incubator.apache.org/ are way too verbose in my opinion, >>> and often mix best practices with

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 1.1.0 release (RC5)

Justin, you are right. These are convenience bin releases. --Yakov 2015-05-19 3:08 GMT+03:00 Justin Mclean : > Hi, > > > We have uploaded release candidate to > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ignite/1.1.0-rc5/ > > And another question, I assume that the ignite-fabric-1.1.0-in

Re: You know what... Apache is just too complicated.

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: >> On 19 May 2015, at 08:18, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >> ...The http://incubator.apache.org/ are way too verbose in my opinion, >> and often mix best practices with policy so I can understand that >> those can give such an impression. >

Re: You know what... Apache is just too complicated.

> On 19 May 2015, at 08:18, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > Hi Stefan, > > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Stefan Reich > wrote: >> ...All you'd have to do is connect programmers to projects. Simple. Why all >> the rules?.. > > Out of curiosity, where did you find so many rules? > > The http

RE: You know what... Apache is just too complicated.

+1000 Sent from my Windows Phone From: Bertrand Delacretaz Sent: ‎5/‎19/‎2015 5:18 AM To: Incubator General Subject: Re: You know what... Apache is just too complicated. Hi Stefan, On Mon, May 18

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 1.1.0 release (RC5)

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > We have uploaded release candidate to > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ignite/1.1.0-rc5/ > > And another question, I assume that the ignite-fabric-1.1.0-incubating.zip > and ignite-hadoop-1.1.0-incubating.zip ar

Re: You know what... Apache is just too complicated.

Hi Stefan, On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Stefan Reich wrote: > ...All you'd have to do is connect programmers to projects. Simple. Why all > the rules?.. Out of curiosity, where did you find so many rules? The http://incubator.apache.org/ are way too verbose in my opinion, and often mix best

RE: [PROPOSAL] Open CRM

Thank you for the suggestion. I am thinking of an alternate name. Keeping this chain open for any input from members. Regards - Shibasis -Original Message- From: Sergio Fernández [mailto:wik...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, 19 May 2015 9:26 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: shibasis

Re: [PROPOSAL] Open CRM

I guess you should look for a better name... There is a obvious conflict with another product/s. See for instance http://www.opencrm.co.uk On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:05 PM, shibasis sengupta wrote: > Dear Members, > > Wanted to propose my project for incubation in ASF. > The project is a full bl

[PROPOSAL] Open CRM

Dear Members, Wanted to propose my project for incubation in ASF. The project is a full blown Web based CRM project and ready for a demo. I have a working code base to start with. Only catch is, its developed using .NET - does ASF consider .NET projects? Highly appreciate any suggestion/feedbac

RE: Request for information on Incubation

Thanks Mate. I am checking the links you provided. Also, checking this link - http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#preparation -Original Message- From: Benedikt Ritter [mailto:brit...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, 19 May 2015 8:42 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject:

Re: Request for information on Incubation

Hello Shibasis, please have a look at the documentation on the incubator website [1]. This give a good overview how incubation at the ASF works. HTH, Benedikt [1] http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Process_Description.html 2015-05-19 12:05 GMT+02:00 shibasis sengupta : > Forwarding to the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 1.1.0 release (RC5)

On 19.05.2015 00:42, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > In the source reefs eI notice a LICENSE, LICENSE.txt, NOTICE and NOTICE.txt > whose contents don’t match each other. I assume the LICENSE.txt and > NOTICE.txt are the real files to look at? Yes. the LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt appear to be the r

RE: Request for information on Incubation

Forwarding to the general group for suggestion/guidance. I can share a presentation for easier understanding of the project status. The project currently is on home laptop. From: shibasis sengupta [mailto:shibas...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 19 May 2015 7:54 PM To: 'general-ow...@incubator.apa

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Slider 0.80.0-incubating release

The Apache Slider team is proud to announce Apache Slider incubation release version 0.80.0-incubating. Apache Slider (incubating) is a YARN application which deploys existing distributed applications on YARN, monitors them, and makes them larger or smaller as desired - even while the application