Re: Helping Neo4j Release an Apache2 API for Apache Projects

2015-04-30 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hello, Here are notes to peoples comments thus far: 1. TinkerPop2 (prior to Apache) maintained all the vendor connectors. This was very burdensome for the TinkerPop developers as we had to stay up to date on each vendors changes. We didn't want to go down this road for TinkerPop3 (now

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lens 2.1.0-beta-incubating

2015-04-30 Thread Amareshwari Sriramdasu
+1 (binding) from my side for the release. Thanks, Amareshwari On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Amareshwari Sriramdasu < amareshw...@apache.org> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > This is the call for vote for the following RC to be released as official > ApacheLens 2.1.0-beta-incubating release. This

[VOTE] Release of Apache Lens 2.1.0-beta-incubating

2015-04-30 Thread Amareshwari Sriramdasu
Hello everyone, This is the call for vote for the following RC to be released as official ApacheLens 2.1.0-beta-incubating release. This is our second release. Apache Lens provides an Unified Analytics interface. Lens aims to cut the Data Analytics silos by providing a single view of data across

Re: Helping Neo4j Release an Apache2 API for Apache Projects

2015-04-30 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Marko Rodriguez wrote: > ...In short, TinkerPop would depend on an Apache2 licensed neo4j-api. Some > manual > downloads from testers/users would be required to use the tinkerpop-neo4j > component > with a Neo4j database That sounds ok to me as long as

Re: Helping Neo4j Release an Apache2 API for Apache Projects

2015-04-30 Thread Rob Vesse
On 30/04/2015 00:24, "Niclas Hedhman" wrote: >But may I suggest the other way around?? Can't Neo4j have a Tinkerpop >module at their end, which Tinkerpop advertise to be available for those >that can live with the GPL/AGPL limitations? That would make this a >non-issue, and IIUIC fits well withi