Ok, that's true, but the same person has been involved in both cases, so
it's not a big logical leap.
A.
On Wednesday, April 22, 2015, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 22.04.2015 08:04, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> > I have to express a concern here - this sort of thing has happened before
> > with the same p
On 22.04.2015 08:04, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> I have to express a concern here - this sort of thing has happened before
> with the same person on a different ASF account. A pattern is forming.
It was not the same person. The only obvious pattern here is "Twitter"
and I'm not going to repeat my views
I have to express a concern here - this sort of thing has happened before
with the same person on a different ASF account. A pattern is forming.
A.
On Tuesday, April 21, 2015, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Excellent answer.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Konstantin Boudnik > wrote
+1. -- justin
On Apr 20, 2015 1:47 AM, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
>http://s.apache.org/Oxt
>
> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Geode
> as a new incubator project.
>
> The proposal is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incuba
All,
Upon entering the incubator, the Apache Usergrid podling filed a CCLA for
contributors. Within that CCLA was a noted grant about the software behind
Usergrid. Upon closer inspection, it was deemed that there was in fact a
missing SGA, in that the original CCLA provided no SGA equivalence an
+1 (binding)
-Taylor
> On Apr 20, 2015, at 1:46 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
> http://s.apache.org/Oxt
>
> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Geode
> as a new incubator project.
>
> The proposal is available at:
>https://wiki.ap
Hi,
(sending again as sent from wrong address first time)
+1 binding
For the source release I checked:
- incubating in artifact name
- signatures and hashes good
- LICENSE and NOTICE ok
- All source files have Apache headers
- No unexpected binary files
- Still can’t compile from source but it t
On 4/21/15, 1:28 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Adobe Legal says we can fix trademark attributions after committing to
>>the
>> repo as long as we do it quickly.
>
>I assume that means that “No other license to the Adobe trademarks are
>granted.” would need to be removed?
I don’t think t
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 1:46 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
>http://s.apache.org/Oxt
>
> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Geode
> as a new incubator project.
>
> The proposal is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Geode
Hi,
> Adobe Legal says we can fix trademark attributions after committing to the
> repo as long as we do it quickly.
I assume that means that “No other license to the Adobe trademarks are
granted.” would need to be removed?
Thanks,
Justin
Code is accepted.
Adobe Legal says we can fix trademark attributions after committing to the
repo as long as we do it quickly.
Thanks to Justin for finding the things that need more cleanup.
-Alex
On 4/18/15, 6:36 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>+0 (binding) until "No other license to the
Hello everyone,
Just to be certain, this particular thread VOTE was cancelled. We have a new
VOTE for TinkerPop3 3.0.0.M8-incubating release at this thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201504.mbox/%3CD7D1E153-36B3-4126-B33C-8197C8FEC80B%40gmail.com%3E
Apo
+1
Best regards,
Jia
-Original Message-
From: Mattmann, Chris A (3980) [mailto:chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov]
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 10:01 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Pan, Lei (398K); Lee, Seungwon (398K); Zhai, Chengxing (398K); Tang,
Benyang (398J); jia.zh...@west.
13 matches
Mail list logo
