Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ignite (Incubating) 1.0

2015-04-01 Thread Dmitriy Setrakyan
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan > wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Roman Shaposhnik > > wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:04 PM, P. Taylor Goetz > wrote: > >> > I think it would be good form to let it

Re: Request for Wiki edit permission

2015-04-01 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Anh Dinh wrote: > Could I request for edit permission to https://wiki.apache.org/incubator in > order to upload Podling report? > > My detail: > login: AnhDinh > project: SINGA Done. Marvin Humphrey ---

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ignite (Incubating) 1.0

2015-04-01 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:04 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: >> > I think it would be good form to let it go for a full 72 hours to give >> others the opportunity to vote. >> > I’d

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ignite (Incubating) 1.0

2015-04-01 Thread Dmitriy Setrakyan
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:04 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > > I think it would be good form to let it go for a full 72 hours to give > others the opportunity to vote. > > I’d say give it another day, and be happy it’s likely to pass at this

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ignite (Incubating) 1.0

2015-04-01 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:04 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > I think it would be good form to let it go for a full 72 hours to give others > the opportunity to vote. > I’d say give it another day, and be happy it’s likely to pass at this point. > > That 72 hour guideline/rule is there to allow everyo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ignite (Incubating) 1.0

2015-04-01 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
I think it would be good form to let it go for a full 72 hours to give others the opportunity to vote. I’d say give it another day, and be happy it’s likely to pass at this point. That 72 hour guideline/rule is there to allow everyone a chance to vote. We’re all in different timezones and have

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ignite (Incubating) 1.0

2015-04-01 Thread Dmitriy Setrakyan
We got more than enough votes at this point (+4 binding). Would anyone have objections to close the vote today (after 48 hours)? D. On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:01 PM, jan i wrote: > +1 binding no Aprils fool. > > rgds > jan i > > > On Wednesday, April 1, 2015, Justin Mclean > wrote: > > > Hi, > >

Request for Wiki edit permission

2015-04-01 Thread Anh Dinh
Hi, Could I request for edit permission to https://wiki.apache.org/incubator in order to upload Podling report? My detail: login: AnhDinh project: SINGA Thanks, Anh. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.ap

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ignite (Incubating) 1.0

2015-04-01 Thread jan i
+1 binding no Aprils fool. rgds jan i On Wednesday, April 1, 2015, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 binding > > I checked: > - issues from last release fixed > - hashes and signatures correct > - has disclaimer > - notice and license correct (but see discussion for documentation bug) > - all

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ignite (Incubating) 1.0

2015-04-01 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 binding I checked: - issues from last release fixed - hashes and signatures correct - has disclaimer - notice and license correct (but see discussion for documentation bug) - all source file have apache header - no unexpected binaries - can compile from source Minor issues. Please conside

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ignite (Incubating) 1.0

2015-04-01 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
I'll do it later tonight if nobody beats me to it. Thanks, Roman. On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Dear IPMC - we are one binding vote short. Can anyone chime in, pretty please? > Then we'll have April's Fools release of Ignite ;) > > Thanks! > Cos > > On Mon, Mar 30

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ignite (Incubating) 1.0

2015-04-01 Thread Konstantin Boudnik
Dear IPMC - we are one binding vote short. Can anyone chime in, pretty please? Then we'll have April's Fools release of Ignite ;) Thanks! Cos On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 06:38PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > Hello, > > The Apache Ignite PPMC voted to release Apache Ignite (incubating) 1.0. > > We n

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ignite (Incubating) 1.0

2015-04-01 Thread Konstantin Boudnik
No worries - sorta easy to check, but wanted to make sure On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 02:18PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > No it’s not. My apologies, I forgot to indicate that. > > -Taylor > > On Apr 1, 2015, at 2:15 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > > Taylor, > > > > is your vote binding? Trying to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ignite (Incubating) 1.0

2015-04-01 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
No it’s not. My apologies, I forgot to indicate that. -Taylor On Apr 1, 2015, at 2:15 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Taylor, > > is your vote binding? Trying to figure out the tally of the vote. > > Thanks! > Cos > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 01:34AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: >> +1 >> >> After

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ignite (Incubating) 1.0

2015-04-01 Thread Konstantin Boudnik
Taylor, is your vote binding? Trying to figure out the tally of the vote. Thanks! Cos On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 01:34AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > +1 > > After some digging, the PPMC VOTE looks good. > > -Taylor > > On Mar 31, 2015, at 1:01 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > > > A few notes that co

Re: Incubator Wiki Access

2015-04-01 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Anthony Corbacho wrote: > May I get edit access to incubator wiki to fill out the March report > for Zeppelin project. > My id is anthonycorbacho Done. Marvin Humphrey - To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ignite (Incubating) 1.0

2015-04-01 Thread Stian Soiland-Reyes
I change my vote to +1 (non-binding), fixing for next release is good enough for me. :-) Perhaps worth also checking that maven plugin (assembly?) and report upstream - simply picking last is a bit fragile. On 31 Mar 2015 22:54, "Dmitriy Setrakyan" wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Stia