Probably better to simply delete the URL from the proposal.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Pan, Lei (398K)
wrote:
> Hi Ted:
>
> We have several servers and currently this one is working:
> http://cmacws4.jpl.nasa.gov:8080/cmac/
>
>
> I will fix the others later today.
>
> Thanks,
> -Lei
>
>
Hi all,
Its been nice woking for incubating Lens into Apache. Have created a doc at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LENS/Incubating+into+Apache
with respect to Lens work items. I thought it will be useful for new
projects incubating, so wanted to share with you all. We can improve the
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> I would *really* prefer if run it via twitterdeck. Managing group
> accounts that way is WAY better than sharing credentials.
> I'm enjoying this with @TheASF right now and I think this
> way needs to be promoted for all the @ASFxxx accoun
Hi Ted:
We have several servers and currently this one is working:
http://cmacws4.jpl.nasa.gov:8080/cmac/
I will fix the others later today.
Thanks,
-Lei
On 3/23/15, 1:24 PM, "Pan, Lei (398K)" wrote:
>I will fix it a little later today and let you know.
>
>Thanks,
>-Lei
>
>On Mar 23, 2015,
One more consideration with tweetdeck is that if your main account password
is leaked - all your connected accounts will be compromised as well. Something
to keep in mind.
Cos
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 02:05PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> while trying to spread the good news that the Groovy
Yup, first hand experience with sending something out by accident - hard to
contain afterward
Cos
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:58PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> I would *really* prefer if run it via twitterdeck. Managing group
> accounts that way is WAY better than sharing credentials.
> I'm enjoying
No objection at all.
What is the procedure for switching over?
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> I would *really* prefer if run it via twitterdeck. Managing group
> accounts that way is WAY better than sharing credentials.
> I'm enjoying this with @TheASF right now an
I would *really* prefer if run it via twitterdeck. Managing group
accounts that way is WAY better than sharing credentials.
I'm enjoying this with @TheASF right now and I think this
way needs to be promoted for all the @ASFxxx accounts.
Any objections?
Thanks,
Roman.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 4:5
Done.
Credentials sent to IPMC private list.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> As a big-time user of @ASF... twitter accounts, I think it's a great idea!
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 02:05PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > while trying to spread the good new
OK.
Snagged the ID. I can change the email address to
priv...@incubator.apache.org whenever needed.
In the meantime, I will send the credentials to private@
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
> +1
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Mar 23, 2015, at 2:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
As a big-time user of @ASF... twitter accounts, I think it's a great idea!
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 02:05PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> while trying to spread the good news that the Groovy
> vote has passed, I've realized that we don't have
> a dedicate Incubator Twitter account.
>
> Quest
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 07:21PM, jonathon wrote:
> On 23/03/15 19:04, Cédric Champeau wrote:
> > Awesome! Thanks everyone! Now we rely on our champion and mentors to help
> > us get started :)
>
> This is when things start to get really interesting.
Hey! ;)
Cos
> jonathon
>
-
+1
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 23, 2015, at 2:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> while trying to spread the good news that the Groovy
> vote has passed, I've realized that we don't have
> a dedicate Incubator Twitter account.
>
> Question for all: should we leverage @TheASF for
> the
It certainly wouldn't hurt to have another channel for getting the word
out. I presume @ASFIncubator would announce new proposals, new projects,
project graduations, and releases of incubating software? Anything else
besides that ? (Which is quite a lot already.) This would be more Incubator
covera
> On Mar 19, 2015, at 2:55 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
> http://s.apache.org/KWE
>
> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Groovy
> as a new incubator project.
>
> The proposal is available at:
>https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Gro
Hi!
while trying to spread the good news that the Groovy
vote has passed, I've realized that we don't have
a dedicate Incubator Twitter account.
Question for all: should we leverage @TheASF for
the incubator-level announcements or should we
establish our own handle?
WDYGT?
Thanks,
Roman.
-
I will fix it a little later today and let you know.
Thanks,
-Lei
On Mar 23, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Ted Dunning
mailto:ted.dunn...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Very cool.
There is a link in the proposal that seems no longer to be live.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:55 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
mailto:chri
Let's try discussing them here and see how it goes.
If something breaks in that model, we will have something to fix. Until
then, we don't have anything to fix so we might as well try it.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 1:12 AM, Bertrand De
Very cool.
There is a link in the proposal that seems no longer to be live.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:55 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> One instance of our web services can be found at:
> http://cmacws.jpl.nasa.gov:8080/cmac/
>
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 03/23/2015 05:40 PM, Gour Saha wrote:
Hello,
This is a call for a vote for releasing Apache Slider 0.70.1-incubating.
This is a source+binary release with one .tar file (appdef_1.tar), which is a
text file used for -ve testing.
The following 2 issues were identifi
Le 23/03/15 20:38, Guillaume Laforge a écrit :
> We're already worrying about it enough, don't frighten us ;-)))
Mentors, get the whip out, they are ready ;-)
Congrats guys, this is the very first step, not the most interesting one !
We're already worrying about it enough, don't frighten us ;-)))
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:21 PM, jonathon wrote:
> On 23/03/15 19:04, Cédric Champeau wrote:
> > Awesome! Thanks everyone! Now we rely on our champion and mentors to help
> > us get started :)
>
> This is when things start to get re
On 23/03/15 19:04, Cédric Champeau wrote:
> Awesome! Thanks everyone! Now we rely on our champion and mentors to help
> us get started :)
This is when things start to get really interesting.
jonathon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Great news, and thanks for all those who voted +1!
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Cédric Champeau
wrote:
> Awesome! Thanks everyone! Now we rely on our champion and mentors to help
> us get started :)
>
> 2015-03-23 17:54 GMT+01:00 Roman Shaposhnik :
>
> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:55 PM, Rom
Awesome! Thanks everyone! Now we rely on our champion and mentors to help
us get started :)
2015-03-23 17:54 GMT+01:00 Roman Shaposhnik :
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:55 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
> >http://s.apache.org/KWE
> >
> > I would
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 20.03.2015 21:45, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> The Apache Ignite PPMC voted to release Apache Ignite (incubating) 1.0 RC3.
>>
>> We now request the IPMC to vote on the release.
>>
>> Here is the PPMC voting result form Apache Ig
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 1:12 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>> ...The mailing lists derive their power from being focused on specific
>> topics
>
> I disagree, our mailing lists are focused on *communities*, not topics.
>
>> ...With t
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:55 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
>http://s.apache.org/KWE
>
> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Groovy
> as a new incubator project.
>
> The proposal is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Groo
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:55 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
>http://s.apache.org/KWE
>
> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Groovy
> as a new incubator project.
>
> The proposal is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Groo
Hello,
This is a call for a vote for releasing Apache Slider 0.70.1-incubating.
This is a source+binary release with one .tar file (appdef_1.tar), which is a
text file used for -ve testing.
The following 2 issues were identified in release 0.70.0-incubating and have
been fixed in this release
Oh. I confused myself. The POLL is about the processing of proposals to
create pTLPs, and I was thinking about the creation of procedures for the
processing of proposals to create pTLPs. I think the first is fine, right here
where it has been.
It might be strange for a pTLP proposal to be
On 20.03.2015 21:45, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The Apache Ignite PPMC voted to release Apache Ignite (incubating) 1.0 RC3.
>
> We now request the IPMC to vote on the release.
>
> Here is the PPMC voting result form Apache Ignite IPMC:
>
> 5 +1 (binding)
> 0 <= 0 (binding)
>
> The dev li
The main job of the Incubator is to evaluate and develop incoming
projects into eventually becoming TLPs (or to attic those that don't).
So far, this has been done by having them as podlings under the
supervision of the Incubator PMC.
In the case of pTLPs, candidate projects would be at a stage w
+1 (binding)
On 19/03/15 07:55, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
http://s.apache.org/KWE
I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Groovy
as a new incubator project.
The proposal is available at:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/GroovyProposal
a
Le 19/03/15 07:55, Roman Shaposhnik a écrit :
> Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
>http://s.apache.org/KWE
>
> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Groovy
> as a new incubator project.
>
> The proposal is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/GroovyProposal
>
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> ...The mailing lists derive their power from being focused on specific
> topics
I disagree, our mailing lists are focused on *communities*, not topics.
> ...With that said, pTLP and direct-to-TLP issues have no business being on the
36 matches
Mail list logo
