On Thursday, March 5, 2015, Lewis John Mcgibbney
wrote:
> Hi general@,
>
> I am bringing this VOTE a a close. We have the following RESULT to report.
>
> [13] +1 I am happy with Commons RDF entering incubation
> Alan D. Cabrera
> Chris Mattmann*
> Benedikt Ritter
> Lewis J. McGibbney*
> John D. A
Hi all,
The Apache Lens team is proud to announce the release of Apache Lens
2.0.1-beta-incutaing. This is the first release of Apache Lens.
Apache Lens provides an Unified Analytics interface. Lens aims to cut the
Data Analytics silos by providing a single view of data across multiple
tiered dat
Hi general@,
I am bringing this VOTE a a close. We have the following RESULT to report.
[13] +1 I am happy with Commons RDF entering incubation
Alan D. Cabrera
Chris Mattmann*
Benedikt Ritter
Lewis J. McGibbney*
John D. Ament (Gary is now on board as mentor)
Rob Vesse
Hadrian Zbarcea
Sergio Ferná
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 3:34 PM Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > And with a major assist from Humbledooh, Marvin is back up
> > and running!
>
> Go go go the-other-marvin!
>
> Thanks Jim and Daniel!
>
> -- the other-other-Marvin
>
Great news, we
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> And with a major assist from Humbledooh, Marvin is back up
> and running!
Go go go the-other-marvin!
Thanks Jim and Daniel!
-- the other-other-Marvin
-
To unsubscribe, e-
And with a major assist from Humbledooh, Marvin is back up
and running!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
The bylaws don't grok the idea of a "provisional" PMC; it either
is one, or it isn't. So whether we call it provisional or not,
legally we need to understand whether we actually want it
as a real, official PMC or not.
And if we do, what, again, does the "provisional" qualifier really
mean?
> On M
On 03/04/2015 01:41 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Doug Cutting mailto:cutt...@apache.org>> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Roman Shaposhnik mailto:r...@apache.org>> wrote:
> At this point, I would like to open this document for soliciting as
>
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > At this point, I would like to open this document for soliciting as
> > wide a feedback as possible. I would like to especially request
> > attention of the ASF board members who ask
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> At this point, I would like to open this document for soliciting as
> wide a feedback as possible. I would like to especially request
> attention of the ASF board members who asked for this type of
> a document to be available.
As a direct
OK, we are Xerte Project, we make multimedia authoring tools for educators -
it's a successful project. Last year we decided we wanted to transition
stewardship of the software from University of Nottingham, where I work, to a
foundation. We are working through the incubation process at the Aper
In *github* you should not be worried about GPL code. In git.apache.org you
should. (Apache's git repos are mirrored back again to github.com/apache
but that is another matter)
Apologies for not knowing your context..
If you are staging the github repos to move them into Apache, then I would
remo
Thanks to everyone for their contributions. The key uncertainty is whether GPL
code in the github is problematic, and the answer is 'yes'.
I wrote the following back to our own lists:
"The whole reason to do Apache license is to make it super-crystal clear that
this code is absolutely fine fo
It provides some alternative authentication I think. It's not mine: I found it
there and needed to check out licensing issues etc. Most of it, in fact can be
deleted.
But the point " There cannot be any GPL code in an Apache repository or in an
Apache release" is the stance we will take. It's s
There's not strictly a legal problem with the GPL-using code to be in
Apache's source code repository (and itself be under the Apache
license) - but due to the 'viral' nature of GPL, any compiled products
become GPL as well.
For LGPL dependencies this is less of a worry - but still LGPL comes
with
Releases explained here:
https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
Basically putting into git/svn is not a release - but as anyone
(practically any committer) can propose a release candidate for voting
based on the code in the source code repository, it should still be
code that is distributable un
I have a feeling it is some alternative authentication thing. It's optional, to
make the project work under certain circumstances.
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré [mailto:j...@nanthrax.net]
Sent: 04 March 2015 13:47
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: GPL Code in
That must be a configuration error for http://www.apache-extras.org/
http://apache-extras.org/ redirect correctly to
https://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/hosting/
I've raised it as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9229
On 4 March 2015 at 15:26, John D. Ament wrote:
> I notice
I notice that apache-extras is now forwarding to Any23. Is that on purpose?
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 10:15 AM Benson Margulies
wrote:
> An Apache project may not manage a codebase outside of Apache. Some people
> who happen to be members of an Apache community can maintain code outside
> of Apach
> The following should help the developer understand why we can't accept GPL
> code in Apache projects:
The question is more about when does 'distribution' happen? When you put
something in your github? Or when you make a release and the files associated
with that release?
-Original Messag
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 10:23 AM Julian Tenney <
julian.ten...@nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
> We have two things that are GPL: one is optional, I don't have any problem
> with that. I'm trying to get a bit more understanding of the other one!
>
> But the point is taken: if that component is needed to m
We have two things that are GPL: one is optional, I don't have any problem with
that. I'm trying to get a bit more understanding of the other one!
But the point is taken: if that component is needed to make a certain function
work, and that function is considered a central part of the software (
Exactly, that's why I asked ;)
Just to be sure, else it's an issue IMHO.
Regards
JB
On 03/04/2015 04:14 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
An Apache project may not manage a codebase outside of Apache. Some people
who happen to be members of an Apache community can maintain code outside
of Apache, if
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Stian Soiland-Reyes [mailto:st...@apache.org]
Sent: 04 March 2015 15:14
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: GPL Code in GitHub
It depends how you integrate it - you can't put LGPL or GPL stuff into
distributions from Apache - and you can't real
An Apache project may not manage a codebase outside of Apache. Some people
who happen to be members of an Apache community can maintain code outside
of Apache, if they are very clear in distinguishing; it must not be a
product of the project. See 'Apache Extras'.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Je
It depends how you integrate it - you can't put LGPL or GPL stuff into
distributions from Apache - and you can't really do a release that is
incomplete without it (e.g. "To make X work, download the GPL library
Y and put it into lib")
Optional dependencies (e.g. plugins) should however be fine to
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 8:45 AM Julian Tenney
wrote:
> Question: I know I've seen this discussed here before, and in any case,
> you guys are the best source for an answer:
>
> Can we have GPL code in a repository as long as that is not distributed
> with the product in a 'official' release?
>
Th
Hi Julian,
the code is not included in the project (just a reference) ?
Regards
JB
On 03/04/2015 02:44 PM, Julian Tenney wrote:
Question: I know I've seen this discussed here before, and in any case, you
guys are the best source for an answer:
Can we have GPL code in a repository as long as
Question: I know I've seen this discussed here before, and in any case, you
guys are the best source for an answer:
Can we have GPL code in a repository as long as that is not distributed with
the product in a 'official' release?
Thanks a lot,
Julian
This message and any attachment are int
+1 (binding)
Thanks everybody for your contributions to this proposal. Particularly
Lewis John Mcgibbney for taking care of the VOTE. I still need to
catch-up my mail of the last two vacations weeks to get an overview of
the latest discussions.
On 27/02/15 20:19, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote
All,
Just a reminder that podling reports are due today. the following podlings
have not reported yet:
BatchEE (2nd month)
Ignite
Kalumet
Kylin
Ranger
Sentry
Streams
Thanks,
John
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 5:54 PM John D. Ament wrote:
> Howdy ya'll
>
>
> Trying to get an early start on the nex
31 matches
Mail list logo
