pTLP process amendments

Roman, See comments below to https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COMDEV/Provisional+TLP 2.1 --> I suggest to change the word "probationary" to "provisional". I also suggest that a text is added such as; 'It is required that the "provisional" concept is explained in detail to the users,

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache AsterixDB in to the Incubator

Thx! On 2/23/15 4:26 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote: Thank you Ate! I have added you as a mentor on the proposal! https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AsterixDBProposal Cheers, Chris ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Inst

RE: Practical next steps for pTLP experiment

Fair enough. I don't think I ever agreed they are orthogonal. In fact the only concern I have consistently stated, and is reflected on the summary below, is that it, potentially, moves the problem rather than solves it. That being said, if we accept its orthogonal then your point is a good one.

Re: March 2015 Incubator report timeline

On Mon Feb 23 2015 at 6:31:50 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Adam Bordelon wrote: > > Assuming Myriad gets voted into the incubator this week, is there > anything > > I/we will need to do for the March incubator report? > > It would be helpful if you could submit y

Re: [VOTE] Accept Myriad into the Apache Incubator

Oh ok, because of that you can't make it to this month's report ;-) On Sun Feb 22 2015 at 6:16:25 PM Ted Dunning wrote: > 7 days was chosen to be conservative. I advised Adam not to hurry the > vote. > > > > On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 10:04 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > > Just curious - why

Re: [VOTE] Accept Myriad into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Saturday, February 21, 2015, Adam Bordelon wrote: > Hello friends, > > After receiving a positive response on the discussion thread, and even a > new Mentor (Luciano), I would like to call a VOTE to accept Myriad into the > Apache Incubator. I will end the vote after 7 days. > > https://wi

Re: Practical next steps for pTLP experiment

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote: > It's not unfair. I deliberately tried to say i don't want to distract from > the handover process. I though we all agreed that whatever pTLP is -- it is absolutely 100% orthogonal to the process that Incubator is in business o

Re: Practical next steps for pTLP experiment

Hi Niclas, I’m in favor of the overall pTLP process. I don’t agree with others that it hasn’t been well specified yet. I think it’s easy to invent things that haven’t been done and to overlook what has been done (more than 1 wiki page, in Incubator-ville; an in ComDev now, thanks to Roman; 100s-10

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache AsterixDB in to the Incubator

Thank you Ate! I have added you as a mentor on the proposal! https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AsterixDBProposal Cheers, Chris ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA

RE: Practical next steps for pTLP experiment

Board@ discussions Sent from my Windows Phone From: Roman Shaposhnik Sent: ‎2/‎23/‎2015 3:53 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Practical next steps for pTLP experiment On Mon, Feb 23,

RE: Practical next steps for pTLP experiment

It's not unfair. I deliberately tried to say i don't want to distract from the handover process. How you would want to handle things is not necessarily the way the incoming chair wants to handle things. By delaying the discussion until afterwards I merely want to give the incoming chair a chance

Re: Practical next steps for pTLP experiment

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) > wrote: >> We don't need consensus from the board. We need data to allow the board to >> evaluate properly. > > That's fair, but what *exactly* do you need?.. As far as I'm c

Re: Practical next steps for pTLP experiment

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote: > The board have asked for the IPMC to make recommendations. Is the precise nature of what being asked recorded anywhere? Thanks, Roman. - To unsubscribe, e-ma

Re: Practical next steps for pTLP experiment

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote: > We don't need consensus from the board. We need data to allow the board to > evaluate properly. That's fair, but what *exactly* do you need? > The IPMC is tasked with providing recommendations. Personally I'm waiting for > t

RE: Practical next steps for pTLP experiment

The board have asked for the IPMC to make recommendations. Sent from my Windows Phone From: Roman Shaposhnik Sent: ‎2/‎23/‎2015 3:46 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Practical next st

RE: Practical next steps for pTLP experiment

We don't need consensus from the board. We need data to allow the board to evaluate properly. The IPMC is tasked with providing recommendations. Personally I'm waiting for the disruption a chair change brings to settle down and will then look forward to helping with some experimentation (I don'

Re: Practical next steps for pTLP experiment

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > I would like to pick this thread up again... Thanks! I apologize for being completely unavailable for the past 10 days or so -- the amount of stuff happening @$WORK was way too overwhelming. As a matter of fact, my biggest surprise was th

Re: [VOTE] Accept Myriad into the Apache Incubator

On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Adam Bordelon wrote: > Hello friends, > > After receiving a positive response on the discussion thread, and even a > new Mentor (Luciano), I would like to call a VOTE to accept Myriad into the > Apache Incubator. I will end the vote after 7 days. > > https://wiki.a

Re: Practical next steps for pTLP experiment

Hi, On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > ...At least superficially, it seems that there is no consensus at the Board > level at this point in time. It is difficult to gauge whether a consensus > in favor can be reached, or that this idea should be dropped... To clarify my po

Re: March 2015 Incubator report timeline

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Adam Bordelon wrote: > Assuming Myriad gets voted into the incubator this week, is there anything > I/we will need to do for the March incubator report? It would be helpful if you could submit your first report during this cycle. Just add your section to the wiki

Re: March 2015 Incubator report timeline

Adam, If Myriad gets accepted, by Saturday, I don't think at this point you should aim to report this month. You may want to review with champions/mentors to agree on how to handle, but I think it's fine for your first report to come in April. You can at least look to be listed as a new podling

Re: March 2015 Incubator report timeline

Assuming Myriad gets voted into the incubator this week, is there anything I/we will need to do for the March incubator report? Thanks, -Adam- On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 2:54 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Howdy ya'll > > > Trying to get an early start on the next month's report. Podling reports > du

March 2015 Incubator report timeline

Howdy ya'll Trying to get an early start on the next month's report. Podling reports due next Wednesday and so forth. March 2015 Incubator report timeline: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2015 Wed March 04 -- Podling reports due by end of day Sun March 08 -- Shepherd rev

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Aurora from the Incubator

+1 (binding) On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Monday, February 23, 2015, Jake Farrell wrote: > > > This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Aurora > > has approved on the dev list with 26 positive votes (12 PPMC (4 from IPMC

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Johnzon 0.6-incubating

This vote passes with 3 binding +1 votes, one non binding +1 vote and no -1 votes. Thanks Hendrik On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Hendrik Dev wrote: > The Apache Johnzon PPMC has voted to release Apache Johnzon > 0.6-incubating based on the release candidate described below. Now it > is the IPM

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Aurora from the Incubator

+1 (binding) On Monday, February 23, 2015, Jake Farrell wrote: > This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Aurora > has approved on the dev list with 26 positive votes (12 PPMC (4 from IPMC > members), 14 community) > > Status page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/a

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Aurora from the Incubator

On Monday, February 23, 2015, Jake Farrell wrote: > This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Aurora > has approved on the dev list with 26 positive votes (12 PPMC (4 from IPMC > members), 14 community) > > Status page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/aurora.html > G

[VOTE] Graduate Apache Aurora from the Incubator

This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Aurora has approved on the dev list with 26 positive votes (12 PPMC (4 from IPMC members), 14 community) Status page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/aurora.html Graduation discussion: http://s.apache.org/dpn Graduation resolu

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache AsterixDB in to the Incubator

+1 (binding) Very interesting. And if you still like or need another mentor, I'd be willing to help out. Ate On 2015-02-20 06:38, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote: Hi Everyone, OK, discussion has died down on this thread. I was originally suggesting that the pTLP option may be best for this com

Re: [STATUS] WAS [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

Hello, 2015-02-22 21:56 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament : > Lewis, > > It looks like there were a few things called out. > > - Identify a champion (looks like you did already) > - Solicit support from mentors. > > It looks like those are the only two open issues. Benedikt cannot be > listed as a mentor,

Re: [VOTE] Accept Myriad into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Rob On 22/02/2015 05:34, "Adam Bordelon" wrote: >Hello friends, > >After receiving a positive response on the discussion thread, and even a >new Mentor (Luciano), I would like to call a VOTE to accept Myriad into >the >Apache Incubator. I will end the vote after 7 days. > >https://

Re: Practical next steps for pTLP experiment

I would like to pick this thread up again... IIUIC (sorry in advance if I grossly misrepresent opinion), the various views that exists can be attributed to the following Board members; Greg, Chris --> Would like to have "Provisional" badge, which entails disclaimers to alert users. Sam --> Think