Re: Draft Report February 2015 - please review

2015-02-11 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > It's my understanding that Droids is basically a mature product with no > pressing need for further development, not unlike some dormant Apache TLPs who > neverthess still have PMC members hanging around able to make releases and > respond t

Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2015 is coming

2015-02-11 Thread Ulrich Stärk
FYI in case this email hasn't reached you. Forwarded Message Subject: Google Summer of Code 2015 is coming Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 23:44:52 +0100 From: Ulrich Stärk Reply-To: ment...@community.apache.org To: ment...@community.apache.org Hello PMCs (incubator Mentors, please forw

Re: "-incubator" in versions of podling maven artifacts

2015-02-11 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > An incubator release is a kind of pre-release - community wise. But perhaps > you mean this is not ideal for mature projects who were codewise stable > before joining the incubator? To me the biggest signaling that needs to happen has

Re: Draft Report February 2015 - please review

2015-02-11 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > Not sure if this is too late.. > > I added the Taverna's completed Name Search under the Legal / > Trademarks summary. That's fine -- it's not a controversial item. > I didn't add Taverna under IP Clearance - although it's been sent t

Re: [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

2015-02-11 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote: > I've added myself a potentially a Champion for the Commons RDF. I've also > added Apache Any23 as a potential sponsoring entity. > For context, Any23 was sponsored through the incubator by Apache Tika. Upom > graduation, Any23 then th

Re: [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

2015-02-11 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
+1 while I can’t commit to mentoring, I will be actively and eagerly watching this. Good work guys. ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pas

Re: [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

2015-02-11 Thread Lewis John Mcgibbney
Hi Folks, On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 2:03 AM, wrote: > > ATTENTION IPMC! If anybody is out there wants a low-stress Mentoring gig, > this is it. And if you're an "RDF neutral" outsider, you'll be helping > this project to achieve its goals, just by showing up. > > I've added myself a potentially

Re: [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

2015-02-11 Thread Sergio Fernández
On 11/02/15 05:03, Marvin Humphrey wrote: The Champion's main work is to help formulate the proposal. That work is essentially done -- so it doesn't matter too much who takes that role, now. Are Andy and Reto opting out out as a gesture of openness to Sesame? Sergio has effectively been the C

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Slider 0.61.0-incubating

2015-02-11 Thread Steve Loughran
The Slider 0.61.0-incubating vote is complete. This is a re-release of the 0.60.0-incubating source tree along with the POM files enhancements needed to publish the binary artifacts to a maven repository; as a convenience these artifacts will now be published to the central repository. The VOTE p

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Slider 0.61.0-incubating

2015-02-11 Thread Steve Loughran
After a quick email exchange with our mentors, I'm going to publish the 0.61.0-incubating release as voted through, with the 0.7x release process to begin shortly —the latter to address all licensing inconsistencies in .py dependencies. Announcement to follow. -Steve

Re: [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

2015-02-11 Thread Sergio Fernández
Cool! Thanks, Rob. On 11/02/15 11:02, Rob Vesse wrote: Marvin Yes I would be willing to be a mentor for this podling if there isn't sufficient volunteers and they would be willing to have me I agree that there is a tendency then to make the podling Jena heavy but I have had zero involvement in

Re: Draft Report February 2015 - please review

2015-02-11 Thread Stian Soiland-Reyes
Not sure if this is too late.. I added the Taverna's completed Name Search under the Legal / Trademarks summary. I didn't add Taverna under IP Clearance - although it's been sent to secretary@, it's not been confirmed by the secretary - probably something fell over with email + attachments + int

Re: [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

2015-02-11 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 11/02/15 10:02, Rob Vesse wrote: Marvin Yes I would be willing to be a mentor for this podling if there isn't sufficient volunteers and they would be willing to have me Thank you - added! (before you change your mind :-)) I agree that there is a tendency then to make the podling Jena heav

Re: [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

2015-02-11 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 11/02/15 08:14, Sergio Fernández wrote: On 10/02/15 21:31, Marvin Humphrey wrote: If Commons is OK with this, I imagine this is a fine plan -- good enough for entering incubation. I also think it would be OK for the project to decide it wants to become a TLP. Whether the project joins Commo

Re: [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

2015-02-11 Thread Rob Vesse
Marvin Yes I would be willing to be a mentor for this podling if there isn't sufficient volunteers and they would be willing to have me I agree that there is a tendency then to make the podling Jena heavy but I have had zero involvement in the Commons RDF effort to date and the API they are talki

Re: "-incubator" in versions of podling maven artifacts

2015-02-11 Thread Stian Soiland-Reyes
When you say break, do you mean some software is unable to compare version numbers correctly, or that we don't comply with the text of http://semver.org ? > A pre-release version MAY be denoted by appending a hyphen and a series of dot separated identifiers immediately following the patch version.

Re: [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

2015-02-11 Thread Sergio Fernández
Hi, On 11/02/15 05:03, Marvin Humphrey wrote: How good a fit is this project for Commons? Is it similar in scope and size to other Commons components? Any comments from current members of the Commons community? Should we be concerned about potential "umbrella project" issues, such as degradin

Re: Practical next steps for pTLP experiment

2015-02-11 Thread Greg Stein
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > > > > Who ever said the Incubator has the exclusive Right to be the only way to > > become part of the Apache Software Foundation? New approaches can be > > discussed anywhere. At the end of t

Re: [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

2015-02-11 Thread Sergio Fernández
On 10/02/15 21:31, Marvin Humphrey wrote: If Commons is OK with this, I imagine this is a fine plan -- good enough for entering incubation. I also think it would be OK for the project to decide it wants to become a TLP. Whether the project joins Commons or becomes its own TLP won't impact the n