On Thursday, January 29, 2015, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:05 PM, jan i >
> wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > I am a bit confused about the mangling of license/notice files in respect
> > of the source/binary releases.
> >
> > Can I please ask you to make a clear distinction
Appreciate the feedback - understand the vote is still ongoing but wanted
to acknowledge the comments.
Will investigate how to have the build process for the convenience binaries
not add the auto-generated dependencies file and for it to use our license
rather than the stock one. Will also look i
February 2015 Incubator report timeline:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2015
Wed February 04 -- Podling reports due by end of day
Sun February 08 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day
Sun February 08 -- Summary due by end of day
Tue February 10 -- Mentor signoff due
This is the first incubator release for Apache Streams, with the artifacts
being versioned as 0.1-incubating. All blocking issues raised during IPMC
voting for rc1 have been addressed in this version.
We are requesting at least one additional IPMC member votes, as we have
received 2 binding IPMC +
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:05 PM, jan i wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> I am a bit confused about the mangling of license/notice files in respect
> of the source/binary releases.
>
> Can I please ask you to make a clear distinction between source and binary
> (which is not official ASF release) in the ne
+1 (binding)
I am a bit confused about the mangling of license/notice files in respect
of the source/binary releases.
Can I please ask you to make a clear distinction between source and binary
(which is not official ASF release) in the next release.
On side note, I am still not quite comfortabl
The source artifacts look good. The nar and war files deployed in the
orgapachenifi-1022 repository seem to have default LICENSE files that don't
have license info for their bundled dependencies, but they do all have
DEPENDENCIES files listing this information. I haven't worked with these
depende
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> I checked (for both release artefacts):
> - signatures and hashes all good
> - incubating in source package name
> - LICENSE and NOTICE good (but complex!)
> - NOTICE has correct year
> - no unexpected b
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked (for both release artefacts):
- signatures and hashes all good
- incubating in source package name
- LICENSE and NOTICE good (but complex!)
- NOTICE has correct year
- no unexpected binary files (except in some test directories but that's
probably OK)
- all source file
Thanks for pointing that out Henry! Yes, looks like H20 is not an
apache project, I should have verified that.
I will edit that, and revisit that section along with the folks in
Singa community.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Quick immediate comment that "Apache H2O" is
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Joe Witt wrote:
> Hello
>
> The Apache NiFi (incubating) team is pleased to be calling this vote for
> the source release of Apache
> NiFi 0.0.1-incubating.
>
> With six binding (in the ppmc sense) +1 votes and no dissenting votes the
> PPMC has appr
Hi,
(Sorry no one within our poddingly knows the answer to asking here.)
Does anyone know how to use multiple templates with a website editable
via: https://cms.apache.org/
===
Details:
I am working on http://taverna.incubator.apache.org/
This was setup in the typical cms way where
Templates
12 matches
Mail list logo
