Re: Final draft of IPMC report for January 2015

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 5:46 AM, Alex B wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:42 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > There are currently 36 podlings undergoing incubation. One podling >> joined us this month (Corinthia). >> > > It might be a typo here as AFAIK there are two new podlings this moth: > *C

Re: What is "The Apache Way"?

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 9:37 AM, David Nalley wrote: > >> My assumption was that 'setting binding policy on projects' was >> something specifically excluded from my level of authority, as an >> officer derived from the Office of the Presid

RE: What is "The Apache Way"?

That's already in progress as part of this year's budget planning :-) Of course this is distinct from policy. For example: Should the policy say projects are limited to items on the infra core services list? Ross Sent from my Windows Phone From: Shane Curcuru

Re: What is "The Apache Way"?

Dear David: I would *love* to see you propose whatever set of requirements that ASF infra as a service sees as appropriate for our projects, given our history, budget, and a view to ensuring reliable service for the future. Then, include a clear list of bullet points which should go into the Proje

Re: What is "The Apache Way"?

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 9:37 AM, David Nalley wrote: > My assumption was that 'setting binding policy on projects' was > something specifically excluded from my level of authority, as an > officer derived from the Office of the President. If that is not the > case, I am happy to define and publis

Re: Clarification on adding a new PPMC member

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:16 PM, jan i wrote: > On Thursday, January 15, 2015, Marvin Humphrey > wrote: > >> General principle: inviting a PPMC member to join a podling should use >> exactly the same routine as inviting a PMC member to join a TLP, >> except that the entity being notified is the I

Re: Clarification on adding a new PPMC member

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > General principle: inviting a PPMC member to join a podling should use > exactly the same routine as inviting a PMC member to join a TLP, > except that the entity being notified is the IPMC rather than the > Board. Makes sense. I'll adju

Re: Clarification on adding a new PPMC member

On Thursday, January 15, 2015, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > General principle: inviting a PPMC member to join a podling should use > exactly the same routine as inviting a PMC member to join a TLP, > except that the entity being notified is the IPMC rather than the > Board. > > But a TLP does not ad

Re: Clarification on adding a new PPMC member

General principle: inviting a PPMC member to join a podling should use exactly the same routine as inviting a PMC member to join a TLP, except that the entity being notified is the IPMC rather than the Board. Marvin Humphrey On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Billie Rinaldi wrote: > Recent edits

Clarification on adding a new PPMC member

Recent edits to [1] have made the process of adding a PPMC member confusing. Previously, the instructions said to 1) forward the initial vote message to the IPMC, 2) invite the member upon a successful vote, and 3) send a note to the IPMC announcing the new member with the message ID of the vote r

Re: Open votes that have been open for more than 100 days ??

On 15.01.2015 17:57, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: >> ...I'll go and kill that cron job then. Woot!... > Can you also write a note at > http://people.apache.org/~brane/incubator/votes.html to indicate that > the service is discontinued? > > Peopl

Re: Open votes that have been open for more than 100 days ??

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > ...I'll go and kill that cron job then. Woot!... Can you also write a note at http://people.apache.org/~brane/incubator/votes.html to indicate that the service is discontinued? People might have bookmarked it. Thanks again for creating this

Re: Open votes that have been open for more than 100 days ??

On 15.01.2015 15:08, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 5:37 AM, jan i wrote: > >> I just looked at http://people.apache.org/~brane/incubator/votes.html, and >> I do understand that votes can be open for an extended period of time, but >> more than 100 days seems excessive: > Back in

Re: Open votes that have been open for more than 100 days ??

On 15.01.2015 15:06, jan i wrote: > On 15 January 2015 at 14:58, Branko Čibej wrote: > >> On 15.01.2015 14:45, Dave wrote: >>> This vote: "RC4 as Apache Usergrid 1.0 (incubating) 2014–09–03 2014–09–02 >>> 135 days" was cancelled in an email message titled "[VOTE][CANCELLED] >>> Release RC4 as Apac

Re: Open votes that have been open for more than 100 days ??

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 6:17 AM, jan i wrote: > Seems the links jumped back in again, I came to it from "voting status" on > our front page. Don't know how to remove it from there. We need to remove this line: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk/content/stylesheets/project.xml?

Re: Open votes that have been open for more than 100 days ??

On Thursday, January 15, 2015, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 5:37 AM, jan i > > wrote: > > > I just looked at http://people.apache.org/~brane/incubator/votes.html, > and > > I do understand that votes can be open for an extended period of time, > but > > more than 100 days seem

Re: Open votes that have been open for more than 100 days ??

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 5:37 AM, jan i wrote: > I just looked at http://people.apache.org/~brane/incubator/votes.html, and > I do understand that votes can be open for an extended period of time, but > more than 100 days seems excessive: Back in June 2014, I suggested that this service be retire

Re: Open votes that have been open for more than 100 days ??

On 15 January 2015 at 14:58, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 15.01.2015 14:45, Dave wrote: > > This vote: "RC4 as Apache Usergrid 1.0 (incubating) 2014–09–03 2014–09–02 > > 135 days" was cancelled in an email message titled "[VOTE][CANCELLED] > > Release RC4 as Apache Usergrid 1.0 (incubating) - CORRECT

Re: Open votes that have been open for more than 100 days ??

On 15.01.2015 14:45, Dave wrote: > This vote: "RC4 as Apache Usergrid 1.0 (incubating) 2014–09–03 2014–09–02 > 135 days" was cancelled in an email message titled "[VOTE][CANCELLED] > Release RC4 as Apache Usergrid 1.0 (incubating) - CORRECTION" The problem here is that the vote tally script does n

Re: Final draft of IPMC report for January 2015

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:42 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: There are currently 36 podlings undergoing incubation. One podling > joined us this month (Corinthia). > It might be a typo here as AFAIK there are two new podlings this moth: *Corinthia* 2014-12-08 and *Zeppelin* 2014-12-23 -- Kind reg

Re: Open votes that have been open for more than 100 days ??

This vote: "RC4 as Apache Usergrid 1.0 (incubating) 2014–09–03 2014–09–02 135 days" was cancelled in an email message titled "[VOTE][CANCELLED] Release RC4 as Apache Usergrid 1.0 (incubating) - CORRECTION" - Dave On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:37 AM, jan i wrote: > Hi > > I just looked at http://pe

Open votes that have been open for more than 100 days ??

Hi I just looked at http://people.apache.org/~brane/incubator/votes.html, and I do understand that votes can be open for an extended period of time, but more than 100 days seems excessive: Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release 2014–10–20 2014–10–05 102 days Accept Ignite into the Apache Incubato

Re: Please give LeftyLeverenz wiki edit privilege

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Lefty Leverenz wrote: > Please grant "LeftyLeverenz" write access to the wiki so I can make a few > changes to the Apache Project Maturity Model > . done -Bertrand

Please give LeftyLeverenz wiki edit privilege

Please grant "LeftyLeverenz" write access to the wiki so I can make a few changes to the Apache Project Maturity Model . Thank you. -- Lefty Leverenz