Re: P. An Excessive Fascination with the Apache Brand

On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton > wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Ted Dunning >> wrote: >> > ...Of course, it isn't politic to ask a high profile mentor to recuse >> > themselves for lack of helping >> >>

Re: P. An Excessive Fascination with the Apache Brand

On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: >> ...Of course, it isn't politic to ask a high profile mentor to recuse >> themselves for lack of helping > > Maybe we need to add "no politics allowed" to our collection of sl

RE: Incubator report sign-off

Yay progress! +1 Thanks Roman (and everyone else on the thread) Sent from my Windows Phone From: Roman Shaposhnik Sent: ‎12/‎22/‎2014 8:42 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Incubator repor

RE: [DISCUSS] How do podlings add new mentors?

I always thought this was the case, so +1. That being said, there does not (should not?) need to be a special process - this is open source anyone can get involved by just by showing up and helping. If the individual wants to be involved in the project then the title mentor isn't (shouldn't be?)

Re: [VOTE] Accept Zeppelin into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 09:29PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Following the discussion earlier: > http://s.apache.org/kTp > > I would like to call a VOTE for accepting > Zeppelin as a new Incubator project. > > The proposal is available at: > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Z

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework

Hello, I had "read somewhere" that you needed 3 people at minimum for the PPMC. I ran the names (Marko,Stephen,James) by our TinkerPop-Contributors list and there was no pushback. Moving forward, if someone does provide sustained, beneficial work to TinkerPop, they are more than welcome to get

Re: P. An Excessive Fascination with the Apache Brand

On 12/24/14, 9:23 AM, "Ted Dunning" wrote: > >Who would like to send such an email to mentors who have missed, say, all >of the sign-offs next to their name for a period of 4 months? I would do it if I was on the PPMC of a podling and lack of sign-offs was affecting progress. There will often

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework

On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > AA. Initial Committers > > We would like to keep the voting rights to 3 individuals: Marko A. > Rodriguez (Aurelius), Stephen Mallette (Nidomics), and James Thornton > (Electric Speed). > This is a problem for other reas

Re: P. An Excessive Fascination with the Apache Brand

On 12/24/14, 2:43 AM, "Upayavira" wrote: >But if someone sees mentorship as some kind of status, and you politely >ask them to quit as a mentor through complete inactivity, the polite >approach might not yield results given their attachment to the apparent >status. > >In the end, in such scenar

Re: [DISCUSS] How do podlings add new mentors?

+1 ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov WWW: htt

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework

Hi, Marko, On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Marko Rodriguez wrote: > There has been positive pressure on us (both > internally and externally) to move TinkerPop to The Apache Foundation. While skimming the Incubator's commits list this morning, I saw some that some changes had been made to the

Re: [DISCUSS] How do podlings add new mentors?

On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 9:35 AM, jan i wrote: > On Wednesday, December 24, 2014, John D. Ament > wrote: > > ... > > I'd like to propose that a mentor should be able to join an existing > > podling after volunteering and the PPMC of that podling agrees to it (via > > lazy consensus). No required

Re: [DISCUSS] How do podlings add new mentors?

On Wednesday, December 24, 2014, John D. Ament wrote: > I'm bringing this up based on some issue I saw with one podling trying to > add a new mentor to the project. > > From what I can tell on the incubator website, there is no description of > how a mentor gets added to a podling after its been

[DISCUSS] How do podlings add new mentors?

I'm bringing this up based on some issue I saw with one podling trying to add a new mentor to the project. >From what I can tell on the incubator website, there is no description of how a mentor gets added to a podling after its been added to the incubator. During the proposal process, anyone can

Re: P. An Excessive Fascination with the Apache Brand

On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Ted Dunning > wrote: > > ...Of course, it isn't politic to ask a high profile mentor to recuse > > themselves for lack of helping > > Maybe we need to add "no politics allowed" to our collection of

Re: Incubator report sign-off

On Fri Dec 19 2014 at 1:16:32 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Marvin Humphrey > wrote: > > (Adapting my response from the private list...) > > > > +1 to reject reports where not a single Mentor has signed off and to > require > > the podling to report next month. >

RE: P. An Excessive Fascination with the Apache Brand

Two thoughts ... -- replying to -- From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2014 00:33 To: Incubator General Subject: Re: P. An Excessive Fascination with the Apache Brand On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > ...Of course, it isn

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Usergrid 1.0.1 (incubating) RC3

Copying my +1 (binding) from the dev list. On Wed Dec 24 2014 at 9:25:37 AM Dave wrote: > On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Dave wrote: > > > The Apache Usergrid PPMC has voted to release Apache Usergrid 1.0 based > on > > the release candidate described below. Now it is the IPMC's turn to vote.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Usergrid 1.0.1 (incubating) RC3

On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Dave wrote: > The Apache Usergrid PPMC has voted to release Apache Usergrid 1.0 based on > the release candidate described below. Now it is the IPMC's turn to vote. > CORRECTION: as the title says, this vote is for Apache Usergrid 1.0.1. The vote will close on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Usergrid 1.0.1 (incubating) RC3

Dave, Looks like you have a small typo on the version # in the initial paragraph. John On Wed Dec 24 2014 at 9:07:22 AM Dave wrote: > The Apache Usergrid PPMC has voted to release Apache Usergrid 1.0 based on > the release candidate described below. Now it is the IPMC's turn to vote. > > The v

[VOTE] Release Apache Usergrid 1.0.1 (incubating) RC3

The Apache Usergrid PPMC has voted to release Apache Usergrid 1.0 based on the release candidate described below. Now it is the IPMC's turn to vote. The vote will close on Sat Dec 27 09:00:00AM EST 2014 [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Usergrid 1.0.1 [ ] +0 [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Userg

Re: P. An Excessive Fascination with the Apache Brand

But if someone sees mentorship as some kind of status, and you politely ask them to quit as a mentor through complete inactivity, the polite approach might not yield results given their attachment to the apparent status. In the end, in such scenarios, it'll take an impartial rule to resolve that s

Re: P. An Excessive Fascination with the Apache Brand

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > ...Of course, it isn't politic to ask a high profile mentor to recuse > themselves for lack of helping Maybe we need to add "no politics allowed" to our collection of slogans ;-) If someone's not active as a mentor, it's perfectly fine t