Tags are at best a convenience, and nothing else. But so are commit id,
since in the long-term, GIT may not prevail and the commit id is in effect
an internal artifact of Git itself, not the concept of version control
systems. Compare how commit numbers from Subversion are imported to Git
repositor
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier:
> http://s.apache.org/kTp
>
> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting
> Zeppelin as a new Incubator project.
>
> The proposal is available at:
> https://
> On 19 Dec 2014, at 18:30, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>> Are we top posting now?
>>
>> My comments below Ross’
>>
>>
>>> On 19 Dec 2014, at 16:33, Dennis E. Hamilton
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> As a participant, I have two concerns about
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
> Are we top posting now?
>
> My comments below Ross’
>
>
>> On 19 Dec 2014, at 16:33, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>>
>> As a participant, I have two concerns about a player-mentor requirement.
>>
>> 1. Sustainability. In many ways, it is
Sorry, I forgot to change the automatic reply to list when moving this to an
off-list investigation.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 15:07
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [OFF-LIST] RE: Incu
Are we top posting now?
My comments below Ross’
> On 19 Dec 2014, at 16:33, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>
> As a participant, I have two concerns about a player-mentor requirement.
>
> 1. Sustainability. In many ways, it is mentors who need to have their
> attention on The Apache Way and c
Now we are getting somewhere?
This post disappeared too. But yours in the same thread before it didn't. Are
you replying to Chris's post or another here?
Was there anything else at all different?
Is there more than one way you read from the lists (i.e., via a news reader or
something)?
Thank you Benson. And that food fight taught me a lot too and
so did the conversations with you.
Cheers and happy holidays.
Chris
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NA
>
> I recently found this confusing with the first parquet-format release. I
> thought that both commit id and tag were optional, given that the actual
> release candidate is a signed tarball (actually, the "necessary source code
> to build the project" [1]).
>
Commit id is not optional. Tag is.
T
As a participant, I have two concerns about a player-mentor requirement.
1. Sustainability. In many ways, it is mentors who need to have their
attention on The Apache Way and cultivating a sustainable project. That means,
from my perspective, that mentors need to encourage others to do thin
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
wrote:
> I do question the need to dissolve the IPMC
Indeed. Chris' proposal is not exclusive with keeping the Incubator
as it is. Folks could currently submit a resolution to the board to
start a TLP and see what happens.
Doug
---
Assuming that the project "VP" is someone personally invested in the project I
have no real problem with the core of this proposal. If they are not personally
invested, if they are instead a semi-random person from the IPMC then I do not
see how this will address the real problem (which is *not*
On 12/18/2014 05:58 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
All,
I was looking through the incubator site and I don't see anything definite.
Whenever a podling goes for a vote, and they include a git tag in their
vote message, it's typically asked to change to a commit id. It seems to
me this is done for the
Back when I was trying to be the chair of this operation, we (ChrisM &
I & others) had a lovely old food fight about Chris M's proposal. It
seems to me that the fundamental situation as I saw it remains: this
is a proposal to the board to dissolve the IPMC and replace it with
something else. And ju
+1 for Chris's proposal.
Without diminishing the creativity applied to solving problems with
the incubator, perhaps the better solution is to trade those problems
for tractable ones. -C
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
wrote:
> And how could the below proposal return wi
And how could the below proposal return without me passing along
my comment regarding it - if we’re going to emulate the board and
TLPs, etc., why emulate it when we could cut through the middle man
and simply rely on the board to do so? I guess to protect the board
from an influx of “incubating”
Strawman:
What if a mentor is *required* to be an active participant of the project. That
is contributing code, voting on releases and generally engaging with the
community, they would be a better mentor since they have a vested interest in
the project itself. Sure, we might reduce the number o
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> (Adapting my response from the private list...)
>
> +1 to reject reports where not a single Mentor has signed off and to require
> the podling to report next month.
I am confused. We're already doing that. Are you just +1ing an
existing p
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I noted in my comments on the recent Incubator board report that I am
> concerned, month after month, at the number of podlings that have no mentor
> sign-off at all, as well as the ones where a minority of the mentors
> sign-off.
Thanks, Rich!
Hi Rich!
Thanks for raising this point and giving us a bit more of a forcing
function to tackle an old problem: accountability for mentors.
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I certainly don't expect that every mentor has their full attention on a
> podling every month, but I d
Hi Rich,
As I noted previously, at least from my point of view we wouldn't be
accepting a podling's report that wasn't signed off on. I had deliberately
added a section to the report header separating podlings that didn't report
(and hence their reports not being included) and podlings that did r
I noted in my comments on the recent Incubator board report that I am
concerned, month after month, at the number of podlings that have no
mentor sign-off at all, as well as the ones where a minority of the
mentors sign-off.
I certainly don't expect that every mentor has their full attention o
+1 (non-binding)
— Hitesh
On Dec 12, 2014, at 3:54 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> Restarting vote having fixed resolution detail, dastardly AWOL paragraph
> breaks
> and removed nod to increased diversity in introduction.
>
> The Samza podling community has voted to graduate from the Incubator.
>
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 12/18/2014 05:42 PM, Richard Downer wrote:
This is to call for a vote for the source release of Apache Brooklyn
0.7.0-M2-incubating.
Call for votes on d...@brooklyn.incubator.apache.org:
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-brooklyn-dev/201412.mbox/%3
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks
Naresh
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> 2014-12-19 7:24 GMT+01:00 Jaideep Dhok :
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jaideep
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Hyunsik Choi
> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
+1 (binding)
On 19 December 2014 at 14:09, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>
>
> On 12/19/2014 12:29 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> Following the discussion earlier:
>> http://s.apache.org/kTp
>>
>> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting
>> Zeppelin as a new Incubator project.
+1 (binding)
On 12/19/2014 12:29 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
Following the discussion earlier:
http://s.apache.org/kTp
I would like to call a VOTE for accepting
Zeppelin as a new Incubator project.
The proposal is available at:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ZeppelinProposal
and
+1 (non-binding)
2014-12-19 7:24 GMT+01:00 Jaideep Dhok :
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Jaideep
>
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Hyunsik Choi wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Friday, December 19, 2014, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> >
> > > Following the discussion earlier:
> > > h
28 matches
Mail list logo
