+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Jaideep
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Hyunsik Choi wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Friday, December 19, 2014, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> > Following the discussion earlier:
> > http://s.apache.org/kTp
> >
> > I would like to call a VOTE for accepting
> > Zeppeli
+1 (binding)
On Friday, December 19, 2014, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier:
> http://s.apache.org/kTp
>
> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting
> Zeppelin as a new Incubator project.
>
> The proposal is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Zepp
+1
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier:
> http://s.apache.org/kTp
>
> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting
> Zeppelin as a new Incubator project.
>
> The proposal is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ZeppelinProp
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> Following the discussion earlier:
> http://s.apache.org/kTp
>
> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting
> Zeppelin as a new Incubator project.
>
> The proposal is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incub
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> Following the discussion earlier:
> http://s.apache.org/kTp
>
> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting
> Zeppelin as a new Incubator project.
>
> The proposal is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubato
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 7:33 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
>
>> I’d like to volunteer to help out as a shepherd.
>
> Super! I hope you find the experience broadening.
Huge +1 to that! We are always in need of shepherds.
Thanks,
Roman.
Following the discussion earlier:
http://s.apache.org/kTp
I would like to call a VOTE for accepting
Zeppelin as a new Incubator project.
The proposal is available at:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ZeppelinProposal
and is also attached to the end of this email.
Vote is open until at l
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 03:54PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> > Restarting vote having fixed resolution detail, dastardly AWOL paragraph
> breaks
> > and removed nod to increased diversity in introduction.
> >
>
Thank you to all who contributed to the dissuasion! I think
I took all of the feedback into account and will start a formal
vote in a minute.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> +1
>
> Hadrian
>
>
>
> On 12/18/2014 11:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>>
>> An
+1
Hadrian
On 12/18/2014 11:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
And again - big +1: I think the whole data stack will benefit from it.
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 05:18PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose Zeppelin as an Apache Incubator
project:
https://wiki.apache.org/incu
+1 (non-binding).
Agree it's a good addition to the stack.
Tim
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> And again - big +1: I think the whole data stack will benefit from it.
>
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 05:18PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to propose Ze
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 03:54PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> Restarting vote having fixed resolution detail, dastardly AWOL paragraph
> breaks
> and removed nod to increased diversity in introduction.
>
> The Samza podling community has voted to graduate from the Incubator.
>
> The vote p
And again - big +1: I think the whole data stack will benefit from it.
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 05:18PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose Zeppelin as an Apache Incubator
> project:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ZeppelinProposal
>
> Please let me know what do you
Good point!
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 01:58PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> I was looking through the incubator site and I don't see anything definite.
>
> Whenever a podling goes for a vote, and they include a git tag in their
> vote message, it's typically asked to change to a commit id. It
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 7:33 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> I’d like to volunteer to help out as a shepherd.
Super! I hope you find the experience broadening.
> I’ve taken the liberty of adding myself to shepherds.json file.
Extra bonus JFDI points!!
Marvin Humphrey
---
Dear IPMC members,
I’d like to volunteer to help out as a shepherd.
I’ve taken the liberty of adding myself to shepherds.json file. If there are
any objections, feel free to revert the commit.
-Taylor
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
+1 (binding).
Too late for the PPMC vote, sorry.
Findings:
1. Keys verify ok.
2. Notice, license files, copyright statements ok (see #7)
3. Build from source distro without running tests ok (fixed from
previous rc)
4. Build from source distro and running tests ok (fixed from previous rc)
5. Sou
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> On 12/18/2014 11:16 AM, Marko Rodriguez wrote:
>
>> Hello Jake,
>>
>> When talking with Sam Ruby (cc:d) we voiced our concerns about moving
>> all of our infrastructure over to The Apache Foundation. In particular,
>> our GitHub presence and our
No vote should be made without the full backing and understanding of the
community.
See below.
rgds
jan I.
Ps. I do think we have a podling
-- Forwarded message --
From: jan i
Date: 18 December 2014 at 19:09
Subject: Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] make PPMC == committers
To: "priv...@corint
A tad longer answer is that the immutable rules are meant to protect the
Apache Way, because we believe that healthy communities produce health
code. The ASF is a steward of communities that are themselves stewards
of code. The incubation process is meant to benefit the project, allow
new commi
To clarify on Daniel's comments this does not mean that pull requests
cannot be merged
You can have Infra set up ASF integration with GitHub such that pull
requests trigger emails to your projects dev list, those emails contain
instructions on how to pull and merge the request into your local ASF
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
> On 2014-12-18 17:28, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>
>> On 12/18/2014 11:16 AM, Marko Rodriguez wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Jake,
>>>
>>> When talking with Sam Ruby (cc:d) we voiced our concerns about moving
>>> all of our infrastructure over to The Apache Fou
Marko,
I note that you currently do not have a champion and that you have listed IBM
as the sponsor, with two individuals names who (to the best of my knowledge)
are not ASF committers. I suggest these are the first things you need to
address in your proposal. Find a champion who can help you u
This is to call for a vote for the source release of Apache Brooklyn
0.7.0-M2-incubating.
Call for votes on d...@brooklyn.incubator.apache.org:
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-brooklyn-dev/201412.mbox/%3CCABQFKi1P58JJhsgCzXGeW6_fpwHt1imttHENtYPERAgM0nWTGg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
On 2014-12-18 17:28, Sam Ruby wrote:
On 12/18/2014 11:16 AM, Marko Rodriguez wrote:
Hello Jake,
When talking with Sam Ruby (cc:d) we voiced our concerns about moving
all of our infrastructure over to The Apache Foundation. In particular,
our GitHub presence and our public user-mailing list (i.
On 12/18/2014 11:16 AM, Marko Rodriguez wrote:
Hello Jake,
When talking with Sam Ruby (cc:d) we voiced our concerns about moving
all of our infrastructure over to The Apache Foundation. In particular,
our GitHub presence and our public user-mailing list (i.e. tech support
mailing list). I have a
+1 on including commit ID (or SVN revision number) along with any tag (or SVN
tag/branch) for convenience.
-Original Message-
From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndam...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 05:58
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Votes for git repos - commit
On Thursday, December 18, 2014, John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> I was looking through the incubator site and I don't see anything definite.
>
> Whenever a podling goes for a vote, and they include a git tag in their
> vote message, it's typically asked to change to a commit id. It seems to
> me
Hello Jake,
When talking with Sam Ruby (cc:d) we voiced our concerns about moving all of
our infrastructure over to The Apache Foundation. In particular, our GitHub
presence and our public user-mailing list (i.e. tech support mailing list). I
have articulated our concerns in the freshly updated
All,
I was looking through the incubator site and I don't see anything definite.
Whenever a podling goes for a vote, and they include a git tag in their
vote message, it's typically asked to change to a commit id. It seems to
me this is done for the reproducible builds concept. Tags are mutable
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> ...We are preparing a new release just now and are unsure which protocols to
> follow, because we are somewhat in between incubation and TLP now (the
> infrastructure is still set up for an incubator podling):...
You are a TLP indeed, t
Hello!
The Apache Flink project has just been graduated by the board (we are very
excited about this and celebrating today :-) ).
We are preparing a new release just now and are unsure which protocols to
follow, because we are somewhat in between incubation and TLP now (the
infrastructure is stil
Sorry for the noise, seems I closed the vote in a new thread.
rgds
jan i.
On 7 December 2014 at 16:17, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> I believe the critical questions by ipmc members have been answered.
>
> On 2014-12-02 18:25, jan i wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> rgds
>> jan i.
>>
>>
33 matches
Mail list logo
