[DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] SAMOA for Apache Incubator

Hi, I would like to propose SAMOA as an Apache Incubator project. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SAMOAProposal I've posted posted the text of the proposal below: Thanks, Daniel = SAMOA = == Abstract == SAMOA is an an open-source platform for mining big data streams. == Proposal == SAMOA pro

[RESULTS][VOTE] Release Falcon version 0.6-incubating

Hi folks, Thanks for taking time to review and vote on this release. The vote passes with three binding +1's and no -1's. The binding votes were from: Suresh Srinivas Devaraj Das Jan I We'll now move the artifacts to Apache mirrors. -- Regards, Venkatesh “Perfection (in design) is achieved n

[CLOSED][VOTE] Release Falcon version 0.6-incubating

Thanks everyone for voting and it is now closed. -- Regards, Venkatesh “Perfection (in design) is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but rather when there is nothing more to take away.” - Antoine de Saint-Exupéry

Re: [VOTE] accept corinthia into incubator

Hi Jan, +1 from me (non-binding - but I'm a nobody :-) ) Looking forward to seeing how this unfolds. I have an ODF coverage tool I intend to release open source real soon now, which I think may be of assistance to this and other projects. On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:08 AM, jan i wrote: > Hi > >

Re: [VOTE] accept corinthia into incubator

On 02/12/2014 jan i wrote: As champion for corinthia, I hereby ask for a vote on accepting corinthia into incubator. +1 (non-binding) from me, and I'll accompany it with my sincere hopes that the project can be successful. As I told you in person at ApacheCon, I'm not signing up as an initia

[VOTE] Release Samza version 0.8-incubating

This is a call for a vote on a release of Apache Samza 0.8.0 (incubating). This is the second Incubator release from the podling and was voted on by the PPMC (result thread: http://s.apache.org/4gb, vote thread: http://s.apache.org/rfi). The release candidate can be downloaded from here: http://

RE: [VOTE] accept corinthia into incubator

+1 (non-binding) -Original Message- From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 09:09 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] accept corinthia into incubator Hi As champion for corinthia, I hereby ask for a vote on accepting corinthia into incubator. I

Re: Documentation of voting rules.

On 2 December 2014 at 18:24, Benson Margulies wrote: > Apache PMCs, including the incubator PMC, operate by consensus except > in a very small number of enumerated exceptional cases. So, the vote, > I think, is a test of consensus. -1 votes block consensus until > discussed to 0. There's no minim

Re: Documentation of voting rules.

On Tue Dec 02 2014 at 12:25:33 PM Benson Margulies wrote: > Apache PMCs, including the incubator PMC, operate by consensus except > in a very small number of enumerated exceptional cases. So, the vote, > I think, is a test of consensus. -1 votes block consensus until > discussed to 0. There's no

Re: Documentation of voting rules.

Apache PMCs, including the incubator PMC, operate by consensus except in a very small number of enumerated exceptional cases. So, the vote, I think, is a test of consensus. -1 votes block consensus until discussed to 0. There's no minimum number of +1 votes. I am always prepared to be corrected.

Re: [VOTE] accept corinthia into incubator

+1 (binding) rgds jan i. On 2 December 2014 at 18:08, jan i wrote: > Hi > > As champion for corinthia, I hereby ask for a vote on accepting corinthia > into incubator. > > It seems the discussion have died out, in reality most of the discussion > has been through private mails and IRC/hipchat (

[VOTE] accept corinthia into incubator

Hi As champion for corinthia, I hereby ask for a vote on accepting corinthia into incubator. It seems the discussion have died out, in reality most of the discussion has been through private mails and IRC/hipchat (which disturbes me). As a result the proposal is now more clear about what the proj

Documentation of voting rules.

Hi. I have just called for a vote on corinthia, and got a question about the voting rules from the project. I digged into the documentation, and all I can find is the fact that a vote has to be called. I cannot find a definition of the vote (yes I can find our general voting rules, but not which

Re: [PROPOSAL] [DISCUSSION] Corinthia Abstract

On 2 December 2014 at 15:18, Monosoft Mapple wrote: > 🚽🚽🚽 > Wow seems somebody have a very strong picturesque opinion...maybe someone who wants to sell closed source instead of providing opensource. Anyway, if a_guccioo has some serious points I expect we will hear f

Re: [VOTE] Release Falcon version 0.6-incubating

+1 binding have fun rgds jan i. On 2 December 2014 at 16:28, Devaraj Das wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Seetharam Venkatesh > wrote: > > Hello folks, > > > > This is a call for a vote on Apache Falcon 0.6 incubating release. > > > > A vote was held on developer ma

Re: [VOTE] Release Falcon version 0.6-incubating

+1 (binding) On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Seetharam Venkatesh wrote: > Hello folks, > > This is a call for a vote on Apache Falcon 0.6 incubating release. > > A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 10 +1's. > > Vote thread: http://s.apache.org/YwI > Results thread: http

Re: [PROPOSAL] [DISCUSSION] Corinthia Abstract

🚽🚽🚽 Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 30, 26 Heisei, at 3:55 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton > wrote: > > I put together an abstract in the Corinthia Podling Proposal. It is a bit > lengthy and requires review that it captures the essence of what Corinthia is > for without ove