Re: Report Timeline & Report Manager for December

On Nov 22, 2014, at 7:16 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > I know this is a few days early, but considering we have a few > holidays popping up I wanted to send it earlier than later. If we get > any new podlings in the next few days we can add them to the report. > > I'm wondering if anyone's willin

FIXED - Re: Wrong release name - Argus Ranger

Hi: Thanks for pointing out about Ranger release filenames. I have fixed the filename/directory-name as suggested in the email as follows: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/argus/0.4.0-incubating/ranger-0.4.0-incubating.tar.gz https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incuba

Re: Wrong release name - Argus Ranger

Ok, I had to dig into mail archives to figure out what's going on. Currently anything @argus.i.a.o is bouncing. Switching to the ranger mail alias to see if it goes through. John On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 10:22 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Hi Argus, > > I was compiling the release list and noticed

Wrong release name - Argus Ranger

Hi Argus, I was compiling the release list and noticed that yours wasn't named properly. /release/incubator/argus/0.4.0/ranger-0.4.0.tar.gz Per incubation requirements, it needs to be named -incubating - please see http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases Can you

Report Timeline & Report Manager for December

All, I've published the December 2014 report to the wiki. Here's the timeline and shepherd assignment: December 2014 Incubator report timeline: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2014 Wed December 03 -- Podling reports due by end of day Sun December 07 -- Shepherd reviews due

Re: How do reporting groups get assigned?

If this is in fact the case, I'll update the page to indicate how they get chosen. Just to reconfirm. Reporting Group 1 = Podlings who are crated in January, April, July and October Reporting Group 2 = " in February, May, August, November Reporting Group 3 = " in March, June, September, December

Re: [DISCUSS] Rolling shepherds?

I'm still looking to my first podling report :) how does the limit usually get decided? Tim > On Nov 22, 2014, at 5:32 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > Nevermind, appears I'm blind. You're there already. :-) > > On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 8:23 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > >> Tim, >> >> Thanks!

Proposals - wiki required?

All, The current way the proposal page is written, the wiki for proposals is optional. I don't think this is the case any longer, since it looks like we request that all proposals get put there first. Does anyone mind if I rephrase the page to make it mandatory to use the wiki for proposals? Jo

Re: [VOTE] accept NiFi into the incubator

Ok, as long as there's no more editing going on, I'm +1. On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: > On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 3:42 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > > Is it me or has the proposal changed since the vote went out? Ideally we > > want the proposal to be final before sendin

RE: How do reporting groups get assigned?

When a podling joins the incubator it reports monthly for the first three months. When this period ends they go to quarterly. Hence the month of entry determines the report group. Sent from my Windows Phone From: Greg Stein Sent: ‎11/‎22/

Re: [DISCUSS] Rolling shepherds?

Nevermind, appears I'm blind. You're there already. :-) On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 8:23 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Tim, > > Thanks! Looks like you were never added to shepherds.json. Are you in > the incubator group already or not yet? > If not yet, can you tell me your apache id and if you have

Re: [DISCUSS] Rolling shepherds?

Tim, Thanks! Looks like you were never added to shepherds.json. Are you in the incubator group already or not yet? If not yet, can you tell me your apache id and if you have any prefer to a podling limit? John On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Timothy Chen wrote: > I just signed up few weeks

Re: How do reporting groups get assigned?

Leveling. Which group has the fewest? Boom. On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 7:06 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > I always assumed that it was based on the month the podling joins. Since > there are 3 reporting groups, the decision on who to report is on the mod > of the current month number against 3, so I

Re: [DISCUSS] Rolling shepherds?

I just signed up few weeks ago and looking to help out when assigned. Tim > On Nov 22, 2014, at 4:56 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > Hi all, > > I was wondering what everyone thought about the current shepherd program? > > It seems like we have some idle shepherds, who maybe don't have the > ban

Re: How do reporting groups get assigned?

I always assumed that it was based on the month the podling joins. Since there are 3 reporting groups, the decision on who to report is on the mod of the current month number against 3, so I figured M % 3 = reporting group, except 3 replaces 0. But that's only my guess as none of the guides descr

[DISCUSS] Rolling shepherds?

Hi all, I was wondering what everyone thought about the current shepherd program? It seems like we have some idle shepherds, who maybe don't have the bandwidth to help out all the time. What would everyone thing if we marked idle shepherds w/ max_podlings = 0 so that they don't get assigned? Wi

How do reporting groups get assigned?

How do reporting groups get assigned to podlings? Regards, Alan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] accept NiFi into the incubator

On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 3:42 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Is it me or has the proposal changed since the vote went out? Ideally we > want the proposal to be final before sending the vote. > > This is why the vote includes the proposal text or a specific wiki revision. I believe Benson sent the prop

Re: [VOTE] accept NiFi into the incubator

+1 (binding) have fun jan i On 22 November 2014 at 22:55, Joe Witt wrote: > John, > > I've added the volunteering mentors. Updated the IPMC membership status of > the mentors. Updated the CLA status of the contributors. I'll stop doing > so now though to avoid any confusion. > > Thanks > Joe

Re: [VOTE] accept NiFi into the incubator

John, I've added the volunteering mentors. Updated the IPMC membership status of the mentors. Updated the CLA status of the contributors. I'll stop doing so now though to avoid any confusion. Thanks Joe On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 4:42 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Is it me or has the proposal chan

Re: [VOTE] accept NiFi into the incubator

Is it me or has the proposal changed since the vote went out? Ideally we want the proposal to be final before sending the vote. John On Sat Nov 22 2014 at 11:09:52 AM Ted Dunning wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > > On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Joey Echeverria wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > >

Re: Initial Proposal for New Apache Project Welcoming New applicants !!

Hi Folks, The very few of us involved with the Apache Philae project agree that this development be done as part of the Apache James project it self as originally suggested by Jan Feel free now to use the Philae name to any other Apache project... Cheers Brian Brian Antao, Ph.D. 235B Cowbridge

Re: Joining IPMC

IPMC, Josh has been an Accumulo committer for 2 years and is a contributor to a number of other ASF projects. He has shown responsibility and has taken an interest in ASF practices and in communicating these to others. As a member of the Slider PPMC, Josh has learned about the incubator process.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating

+1 Le mar. 18 nov. 2014 18:27, Marvin Humphrey a écrit : > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 9:04 AM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > It looks like johnzon has a dependency on a dual licensed CDDL/GPL > library, > > should that be in the notice file perhaps? > > That wouldn't apply to the official source rele

Re: [VOTE] accept NiFi into the incubator

+1 (binding) On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Joey Echeverria wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Great proposal! > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 16:22 Alan D. Cabrera > wrote: > > > +1 - binding > > > > On Nov 21, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Benson Margulies > > wrote: > > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating

Hi All, this vote passed with: Three +1 binding votes from Justin Mclean, Mark Struberg and Romain Manni-Bucau. There were no 0 or -1 votes. Thanks Kind regards Hendrik On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Hendrik Dev wrote: > Hi all, > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache