Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduation of Apache Drill from the Incubator

2014-10-25 Thread Timothy Chen
Just want to chime in around diversity in Drill. I've been involved in Drill since the beginning of incubation as a non MapR employee, and from the beginning of the project Drill opened up the design and contributions to the community, and was obvious from the design google docs early on with coll

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduation of Apache Drill from the Incubator

2014-10-25 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > I think we should open another separate thread to continue the > diversity discussions without hijacking RESULT thread for Drill. Great point. Thanks, Roman. - To unsubsc

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduation of Apache Drill from the Incubator

2014-10-25 Thread Henry Saputra
I wish the discussions that Sean started had occur for projects like Knox or Tez. I interacted and watch Drill project for a while before being pulled out from my prev employer to stop working on it and I could see that the community did try very hard to diversify and embrace new contributors from

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduation of Apache Drill from the Incubator

2014-10-25 Thread Ted Dunning
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Sean Owen wrote: > I think projects, realistically, get > driven by companies, and necessarily often start around one company. A > bit more diversity here would be good but hey. I take the message that > being an Apache project doesn't signify as much as is advert

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduation of Apache Drill from the Incubator

2014-10-25 Thread Aditya
That's correct. I was talking about recent commits (last few hundreds or so). On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 10:05 PM, Aditya wrote: > >> As a general rule, we *always* preserve patch's author information in the >> commits. >> > > But the early

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduation of Apache Drill from the Incubator

2014-10-25 Thread Ted Dunning
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 10:05 PM, Aditya wrote: > As a general rule, we *always* preserve patch's author information in the > commits. > But the early squashed commits, for instance as Optiq was being pulled in did not preserve this information, I believe.

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduation of Apache Drill from the Incubator

2014-10-25 Thread Aditya
As a general rule, we *always* preserve patch's author information in the commits. There have been, however, occasions where more than one contributors have worked together on a single feature and whenever it had made sense, voluntarily squashed commits under a single contributor's name. Even in s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.7.0-incubating

2014-10-25 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 binding - vote good - artefact name contains incubating - signatures and hashes correct - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENCE and NOTICE correct - can compile from source - tests pass Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: ge

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.7.0-incubating

2014-10-25 Thread Alan Gates
+1. Alan. Robert Metzger October 22, 2014 at 0:29 Hi all, This is our second try to release Flink 0.7.0-incubating. The last time we found a critical issue while the vote was running, so I had to cancel the vote here. The 0.7.0-incubating release will be the second

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduation of Apache Drill from the Incubator

2014-10-25 Thread Sean Owen
I'm reading http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#community "A major criterion for graduation is to have developed an open and diverse meritocratic community ... The project is considered to have a diverse community when it is not highly dependent on any single contributor (there are

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduation of Apache Drill from the Incubator

2014-10-25 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
It¹s not a requirement for graduation from the Incubator, as succinctly summarized by Roy (and I am +1 on this): http://markmail.org/message/w56cmyri4osgcgud ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science D

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduation of Apache Drill from the Incubator

2014-10-25 Thread David Nalley
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > The github listing is not a valid measure since many non-committer (and > quite a few committer) changes were squashed into larger commits. > Why is author information not being preserved? Committer and author are different entities with Git.

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduation of Apache Drill from the Incubator

2014-10-25 Thread Ted Dunning
The github listing is not a valid measure since many non-committer (and quite a few committer) changes were squashed into larger commits. Also, it is recent commits, not total commits that matter. Recent non-mapr contributions include: - Pig parser - Mongo data source I should point out also t

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduation of Apache Drill from the Incubator

2014-10-25 Thread Tomer Shiran
Oops, you're right, and thanks for the clarification. I missed that when I was going through the thread. We actually have 11 +1s (and not 9 as previously stated). In addition to what I listed previously I should have listed: Chris A Mattmann Sergio Fernández On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Matt