Hi,
Thanks for the clarifications.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes
wrote:
> ...Provenance exchange - I am thinking in particular if it would be
> possible to combine our W3C PROV-O provenance support -
> https://github.com/taverna/taverna-prov (which describes a workflow
> r
I haven't tracked Drill during its incubation, so I read through some
of the dev list, poked through the review board and JIRA, read from
the wiki, and brought up the sample through its 10 minute tutorial.
Drill seems to be a very approachable project. It has good docs
(particularly for developmen
On Thursday, October 23, 2014, Tomer Shiran wrote:
> ...Updated resolution with Apache emails...
Thanks, +1 for graduation and for the resolution then.
-Bertrand
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 5:57 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
>
>>> P.S.: Why anyone would think voting on binaries makes any kind of sense
>>> around here is, of course, a different question. I can't even begin to
>>> count the number of t
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Tomer Shiran wrote:
> I had the wrong link in here as well as non-Apache emails. Here's the
> correct information.
>
> Correct link to PPMC vote:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201410.mbox/%3CCAJkA4MF%2B5tWRaoGiimpjB_ixbCQFY%3Dq2oEtz
+1 (binding)
God job guys!
- Henry
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Tomer Shiran wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> We wrapped up the vote on the Apache Drill dev list in which the community
> expressed its desire to graduate to a top-level project. That vote passed
> with 23 +1s (http://bit.ly/1tcrHVS)
Hi, apologies for replying late.
That is the correct link for the Taverna workshop invitation - or
http://taverna2014.eventbrite.co.uk/ for short.
We have been testing the use of Google+ Hangouts, so we'll try to use
that, with recording/streaming to Youtube. That could eliviate some
of the time
Thanks for cleaning up the resolution with @apache email addresses, +1
binding from me
-Jake
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Tomer Shiran wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> We wrapped up the vote on the Apache Drill dev list in which the community
> expressed its desire to graduate to a top-level proj
+1 binding.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Tomer Shiran wrote:
> I had the wrong link in here as well as non-Apache emails. Here's the
> correct information.
>
> Correct link to PPMC vote:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201410.mbox/%3CCAJkA4MF%2B5tWRaoGiimpj
I had the wrong link in here as well as non-Apache emails. Here's the
correct information.
Correct link to PPMC vote:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201410.mbox/%3CCAJkA4MF%2B5tWRaoGiimpjB_ixbCQFY%3Dq2oEtzAwmeQTFZpds59g%40mail.gmail.com%3E
Updated resolution with Apa
Hello, Harbs,
My two cents:
Regardless of policy, I don't see how it makes sense from a governance
perspective for individuals to take controversial independent action on
something so important as release publication. The mere fact that a dispute
exists should block such changes.
Can't the Flex
Forward my VOTE from dev@ list
+1 (binding)
- Henry
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:29 AM, Robert Metzger wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is our second try to release Flink 0.7.0-incubating. The last time we
> found a critical issue while the vote was running, so I had to cancel the
> vote here.
> The 0.7
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Aditya wrote:
> Here is the link to the vote result http://bit.ly/1taQ0Ve.
Thanks!
And sorry that I didn't notice it before, but the list of PMC members
needs to use @apache.org addresses, so that we have stable IDs in the
resolution.
So -1 on the resolution fo
Here is the link to the vote result http://bit.ly/1taQ0Ve.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 6:21 AM, Tomer Shiran wrote:
> > ...That vote passed
> > with 23 +1s (http://bit.ly/1tcrHVS) ...
>
> That link point
Hi all,
This is our second try to release Flink 0.7.0-incubating. The last time we
found a critical issue while the vote was running, so I had to cancel the
vote here.
The 0.7.0-incubating release will be the second major-version release of
Flink in the incubator.
The vote thread can be found he
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 6:21 AM, Tomer Shiran wrote:
> ...That vote passed
> with 23 +1s (http://bit.ly/1tcrHVS) ...
That link points to
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201410.mbox/browser
do you have a link to the actual vote results?
-Bertrand
---
Thanks for the clarification!
I’m still not sure I understand. In plain English we seem to have these
unresolved questions:
1) (Re)compiling convenience packages with modifications to binary dependencies
after the release vote: Is that kosher or not?
2) If a binary dependency is added to a conv
17 matches
Mail list logo
