Re: [Proposal] Taverna workflow

Hi all-- I'm a bit late on this but I would also like to serve as a mentor. I'm a PMC member of Apache Airavata and Apache Rave, and I've also served as a mentor for Apache Stratos. Marlon On 9/26/14, 10:18 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: On 25/09/14 19:19, Suresh Marru wrote: If you need a ment

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release

On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 7:24 AM, sebb wrote: > > If it contains sources, it's not a binary release. > > Not strictly true. Binary artifacts often contain source code examples. Also, for Drill specifically, the code generation strategy that Drill uses requires that snippets of source for differe

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating)

On 13 October 2014 17:11, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > I suggest that the release manager and anyone else in the KEYS file should > have added key fingerprints to their Apache profiles at > . > > This will have their PGP keys refreshed regularly under their Apache ID at > <

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating)

On 14 October 2014 04:40, Ted Dunning wrote: > My search was on the key servers, by using pgp.mit.edu. The issue was that > you, ironically, can't seem to search by key id. You need to prefix the (hex) id with 0x, for example: http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=0x2AD3FAE3&op=index&fingerprint

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release

On 13 October 2014 15:30, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: >> >> For many projects, especially "library" projects, the "convenient binaries" >> that matter most these >> days are the jars (source, binary, and javadoc) that are deployed to the >> m

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release

On 13 October 2014 17:15, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 13.10.2014 16:14, Julian Hyde wrote: >> For many projects, especially "library" projects, the "convenient binaries" >> that matter most these days are the jars (source, binary, and javadoc) that >> are deployed to the maven repo. Calcite release