Re: [VOTE] Accept Ignite into the Apache Incubator

2014-09-30 Thread Stack
+1 from me (mentor, binding). St.Ack On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > I would like to call a vote for accepting "Apache Ignite" for Apache > Incubator. > The full proposal is available below. We ask the IPMC to sponsor it, with > cos > as Champion, and stack, rvs, cos

Re: [VOTE] Accept Ignite into the Apache Incubator

2014-09-30 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > I would like to call a vote for accepting "Apache Ignite" for Apache > Incubator. > The full proposal is available below. We ask the IPMC to sponsor it, with cos > as Champion, and stack, rvs, cos, hsaputra and brane volunteering to be

Re: Committer Voting and Vetos

2014-09-30 Thread Brett Porter
As an additional reference, here's a previous thread on the topic: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201303.mbox/%3ccapfnckijy6tm5tycfn7msch6h0v_ear7ws5qmftegaoo+do...@mail.gmail.com%3E Cheers, Brett On 26 Sep 2014, at 1:59 pm, Alex Harui wrote: > In a past discussion

Re: [VOTE] Accept Ignite into the Apache Incubator

2014-09-30 Thread Henry Saputra
+1 (binding) On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > I would like to call a vote for accepting "Apache Ignite" for Apache > Incubator. > The full proposal is available below. We ask the IPMC to sponsor it, with cos > as Champion, and stack, rvs, cos, hsaputra and brane vol

Re: Committer Voting and Vetos

2014-09-30 Thread Greg Stein
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > > > To the concrete question, the Subversion project never calls a strict > > [VOTE] for new committers or PMC members. We discuss first, and that sets > > the direction. People throw out

Re: FW: [Proposal] Taverna workflow

2014-09-30 Thread Shameera Rathnayaka
Hi Devs, > ​ > > >Apache Airavata http://airavata.apache.org/ is a software framework > >for executing and managing computational jobs and workflows on > >distributed computing resources. Taverna's concern is not as much job > >coordination, but more of a data flow between services. Airavata's > >

Re: Committer Voting and Vetos

2014-09-30 Thread Ted Dunning
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > To the concrete question, the Subversion project never calls a strict > [VOTE] for new committers or PMC members. We discuss first, and that sets > the direction. People throw out +1 messages, but that is "sure, make it so" > rather than a true

Re: Committer Voting and Vetos

2014-09-30 Thread Greg Stein
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Noah Slater wrote: >... > Specifically, we (CouchDB) see voting as the failure mode of a > discussion (a useful one non-the-less), or as a last-step requirement > to officiate a particular set of project-level decisions (that are > fully enumerated in the bylaws)

Re: [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.1-incubating release

2014-09-30 Thread Hendrik Dev
Thanks, see comments below On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:11 PM, sebb wrote: > On 28 September 2014 22:31, Hendrik Dev wrote: >> So the project passed with 6 +1 votes (at least 3 of them binding from >> Romain Manni-Bucau, Justin Mclean and Daniel Kulp) and no -1 votes. >> See http://markmail.org/thr

Re: Committer Voting and Vetos

2014-09-30 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:52 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > ...The HTTP Server project has successfully operated by unanimity... As a side note, I often tell people that IMO the HTTP Server is so modular because people couldn't agree on things - it's much easier to get consensus and sometimes