So the project passed with 6 +1 votes (at least 3 of them binding from
Romain Manni-Bucau, Justin Mclean and Daniel Kulp) and no -1 votes.
See http://markmail.org/thread/2tnh43qokzj3hiwa and
http://markmail.org/thread/g5etfukwi4av6kuk
As of now also the incubator vote passed with at least 3 bindin
Thanks guys. I added a similarity with Apache OODT http://oodt.apache.org/
to the wiki as well.
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasaden
On 26.09.2014 20:03, jan i wrote:
> On 26 September 2014 19:23, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> Just like Ross, the following constitutes my personal opinion
>> (that has been formed over the years of maintaining complex
>> code bases written "before my time"):
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:04 AM,
>I¹m also not sure what history you mean. The only donation that I know of
>that there was no follow through was the Swiz donation.
Also for context: The Swiz folks never submitted the software grant so
technically it hasn't been donated.
-Alex
--
On Sep 28, 2014, at 7:51 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> For some projects automatic committership may work, but given Flex's history
> with donations it's probably not suitable choice of action.
I don’t see what’s different about Flex. The rationale to give them committer
rights is to increase th
For more context, there has been only one prior donation from
non-committers to Flex and that was completed only 26 days ago. All but
one other donation has come from Adobe and are parts of existing Flex
products that Adobe provided before the transition to Apache.
-Alex
On 9/28/14 9:51 AM, "Jus
Hi,
For some context the Flex project has has several donations that have ended up
get little or no involvement from the community or the people who donated them
after donation. For most projects donations (once a project is top level) are
reasonably rare and from what I can see most donations
Hi,
+1 binding
Checked:
- incubating in artefact name
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE correct
- All source code has Apache headers
- no binary files in source
I see that "initial device data was donated by OpenDDR LLC" is in CREDITS,
should something be in NOTICE about this? Would depe
Ok thanks! I will be sure to allow for more voting time next time around.
Original message From: Marvin Humphrey
Date:09/27/2014 6:42 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE]
Apache DeviceMap Data 1.0.1 incubating
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 8:31 AM,
On 28 September 2014 15:24, sebb wrote:
> On 26 September 2014 19:03, jan i wrote:
> > On 26 September 2014 19:23, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
> >
> >> Just like Ross, the following constitutes my personal opinion
> >> (that has been formed over the years of maintaining complex
> >> code bases wr
On 26 September 2014 19:03, jan i wrote:
> On 26 September 2014 19:23, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> Just like Ross, the following constitutes my personal opinion
>> (that has been formed over the years of maintaining complex
>> code bases written "before my time"):
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 1
On 28 September 2014 11:06, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 28.09.2014 02:58, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > I would like to call a vote for accepting "Apache Ignite" for Apache
> Incubator.
> > The full proposal is available below. We ask the IPMC to sponsor it,
> with cos
> > as Champion, and stack, rv
On 28.09.2014 02:58, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> I would like to call a vote for accepting "Apache Ignite" for Apache
> Incubator.
> The full proposal is available below. We ask the IPMC to sponsor it, with cos
> as Champion, and stack, rvs, cos, hsaputra and brane volunteering to be
> Mentors.
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
