Re: Documentation Donation

2014-08-11 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:38 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:32 AM, John D. Ament wrote: >> ...if a podling/TLP were to receive a donation of >> documentation from a third party, should that go through the same reviews >> as source code donations?... > > IMO ye

Re: Documentation Donation

2014-08-11 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:32 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > ...if a podling/TLP were to receive a donation of > documentation from a third party, should that go through the same reviews > as source code donations?... IMO yes. Flex did something like that in http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearan

Re: [VOTE] Accept REEF into the Apache Incubator

2014-08-11 Thread Hitesh Shah
+1 ( non-binding ) — Hitesh On Aug 8, 2014, at 10:40 PM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for participating in the proposal discussion on REEF. The discussion > has calmed. I would like to call a vote for acceptance of REEF into the > Apache Incubator. > > The proposal is attached belo

Re: [VOTE] Accept REEF into the Apache Incubator

2014-08-11 Thread Andrew Purtell
+1 (binding) On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for participating in the proposal discussion on REEF. The discussion > has calmed. I would like to call a vote for acceptance of REEF into the > Apache Incubator. > > The proposal is attached below, and it is a

Re: [VOTE] Accept REEF into the Apache Incubator

2014-08-11 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
+1 binding thanks Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 8, 2014, at 10:40 PM, "Byung-Gon Chun" wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks for participating in the proposal discussion on REEF. The discussion > has calmed. I would like to call a vote for acceptance of REEF into the > Apache Incubator. > > The proposal

Documentation Donation

2014-08-11 Thread John D. Ament
Hi all I was wondering - if a podling/TLP were to receive a donation of documentation from a third party, should that go through the same reviews as source code donations? John

Re: [VOTE] Accept REEF into the Apache Incubator

2014-08-11 Thread jghoman
+1 (binding) -Jakob From: Bertrand Delacretaz Sent: ‎Monday‎, ‎August‎ ‎11‎, ‎2014 ‎1‎:‎16‎ ‎AM To: general@incubator.apache.org On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote: > ...I would like to call a vote for acceptance of REEF into the > Apache Incubator... +1 -Bertrand

Re: August 2014 Incubator Report Timeline

2014-08-11 Thread Konstantin Boudnik
s/Jon/John/ (clumsy me) On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 02:08PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Sorry Jon - I missed the email. And of course you're right about the report. > I will look into what needs to be done for the clean-up tonight. > > Cos > > On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 08:32PM, John D. Ament wrote: >

Re: August 2014 Incubator Report Timeline

2014-08-11 Thread Konstantin Boudnik
Sorry Jon - I missed the email. And of course you're right about the report. I will look into what needs to be done for the clean-up tonight. Cos On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 08:32PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Cos > > Only reason Celix would be on the report still is if they didn't clean up > podlings.x

Re: svn commit: r1617185 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/vxquery.xml

2014-08-11 Thread sebb
On 11 August 2014 15:26, Till Westmann wrote: > > > On 11 Aug 2014, at 5:31, sebb wrote: > >> On 11 August 2014 01:42, wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Description >>> @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ >>> >>> News >>> >>> -2014-07-16. ASF Board establishes the Apache VXQuery >>> project. >>

Re: svn commit: r1617185 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/vxquery.xml

2014-08-11 Thread Till Westmann
On 11 Aug 2014, at 5:31, sebb wrote: On 11 August 2014 01:42, wrote: Description @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ News -2014-07-16. ASF Board establishes the Apache VXQuery project. Why was that deleted? It was a duplicate. The same line was also given at the end of the

Re: svn commit: r1617185 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/vxquery.xml

2014-08-11 Thread sebb
On 11 August 2014 01:42, wrote: > Author: tillw > Date: Mon Aug 11 00:42:15 2014 > New Revision: 1617185 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1617185 > Log: > fix VXQuery incubation status page > > Modified: > incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/vxquery.xml > > Modified: incubator/public/trunk

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache DeviceMap C# and VB.Net client 1.0.0

2014-08-11 Thread eberhard speer jr.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 With regard to the Apache DeviceMap C# and VB.Net client 1.0.0 release for, please note the vote has passed. IPMC +1: Kevan Miller Bertrand Delacretaz Justin Mclean PPMC +1: Werner Keil Bertrand Delacretaz Reza Naghibi Thanks again, esjr -BEGI

Re: Question about roles.

2014-08-11 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > ...The way I read it and the way I've seen it with the Incubator, mentors > can be active project participants as well Agreed, I've been mentoring projects where I was an active developer, and others where I had about zero clue what th

Re: [VOTE] Apache DeviceMap .Net clients 1.0.0

2014-08-11 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 7:33 PM, eberhard speer jr. wrote: > this is the (source only) release email for Apache DeviceMap .Net > clients : > > Apache DeviceMap csharp incubating 1.0.0.0 > and > Apache DeviceMap vbnet incubating 1.0.0.0 +1, details of what I checked are at http://markmail.org/mess

Re: [VOTE] Accept REEF into the Apache Incubator

2014-08-11 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote: > ...I would like to call a vote for acceptance of REEF into the > Apache Incubator... +1 -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For ad

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubator exit criteria

2014-08-11 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:22 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > ...Including the patch below... Sorry to come in late but I had a look at [1] and it's way too complicated IMO, and I don't think the proposed patch helps with that. In general http://incubator.apache.org/ is way too verbose and hard to