Hello,
This vote is now closed and it has passed with 3 binding IPMC +1.
There were no -1 votes, and no 0 votes.
We now have the required number of positive binding votes and will
therefore proceed with publishing this release.
Thank you
Leonidas Fegaras
Binding votes:
+1 Alan Cabrera
+1 Justin M
Hi,
So the vote has passed.
+1 (binding IPMC): Jean-Baptiste Onofre, Justin Mclean, Olivier Lamy
+1 (non binding): Romain Manni-Bucau, Jean-Louis Monteiro, Ashish
I will finish the release process.
--
Olivier Lamy
Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014, at 04:33 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 7:44 AM, John D. Ament
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Roman, hope you don't mind me getting this started early...
>> >
>> > Anyone interested in being a report manager
The mentors of the podling should be IPMCs and their votes are
binding. I recommend to solicit VOTEs from them to get the release
through.
- Henry
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Leonidas Fegaras wrote:
> Hello,
> It has been 5 days since we opened this vote for our second MRQL
> release. We h
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> Fleece's entry is already correct, including the `monthly` tag and the
> duration. It's not clear to me why no reminder went out. :(
I bet it's because clutch.py hadn't been run after the update to podlings.xml.
Marvin Humphrey
---
On 26 June 2014 11:31, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
>> Yes I know it's a sort of grumbling email but It's already hard to
>> release something here especially when you are volunteer and doing the
>> coding part on your spare time and without the
Hi,
Change my vote to +1 binding as all issues I raised have been discussed and can
be addressed in the next release.
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-m
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Robert Metzger wrote:
> I found some inconsistencies in the July report.
> Flink is a new podling, and in my understanding, new podlings have to
> report monthly in the first three months. The project is missing in the
> list.
Thank you very much for your dilige
Hi,
> See http://glyphicons.com/license/
> which says " Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0) "
Not sure that applies - that's for the free version which doesn't include the
Halflings font.
> I hope we can use that. If not so many projects here @apache have
> illegal distributio
On 26 June 2014 12:37, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> The font files in resources/fonts. Any idea where they come from or how
>>> they are licensed? If they are ALv2 or similar then there is no issue.
>> coming from boostrap which is MIT
>
> Looking at the font metadata I don't see a MIT licens
Hi,
>> The font files in resources/fonts. Any idea where they come from or how they
>> are licensed? If they are ALv2 or similar then there is no issue.
> coming from boostrap which is MIT
Looking at the font metadata I don't see a MIT license only a URL [1] and a
copyright - "Copyright © 2013
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Robert Metzger wrote:
> I found some inconsistencies in the July report.
> Apache Stratos graduated in May, so it should not report anymore, right?
Stratos is still getting Incubator reminders because they did not complete the
Graduation guide. Specifically, thi
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Leonidas Fegaras wrote:
> It has been 5 days since we opened this vote for our second MRQL
> release. We have collected one IPMC vote (from Alan Cabrera) and we
> still need two more IPMC votes to approve the release.
> It would be greatly appreciated If someone
On 26 June 2014 11:05, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Yes I know it's a sort of grumbling email but It's already hard to
>> release something here especially when you are volunteer and doing the
>> coding part on your spare time and without the support of all paid
>> folks who join IPMC just to h
On 26 June 2014 11:01, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> what are the binaries???
> The font files in resources/fonts. Any idea where they come from or how they
> are licensed? If they are ALv2 or similar then there is no issue.
coming from boostrap which is MIT
>
>> There are currently 2 IPMC vo
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Yes I know it's a sort of grumbling email but It's already hard to
> release something here especially when you are volunteer and doing the
> coding part on your spare time and without the support of all paid
> folks who join IPMC just to hav
Hi,
> Yes I know it's a sort of grumbling email but It's already hard to
> release something here especially when you are volunteer and doing the
> coding part on your spare time and without the support of all paid
> folks who join IPMC just to have a binding vote on some projects!!
> So please st
Hi,
> what are the binaries???
The font files in resources/fonts. Any idea where they come from or how they
are licensed? If they are ALv2 or similar then there is no issue.
> There are currently 2 IPMC votes from: jbonofre and olamy
> http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html#jbonofre
> htt
On 25 June 2014 17:25, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry I been a bit busy with travel and other releases over the last few
> weeks.
>
> -1 binding due to vote issues, NOTICE and binaries in source release.
>
> I checked:
> - missing VOTE RESULT and can't tell if there are 3 +1 binding votes o
On 26 June 2014 05:29, Mark Struberg wrote:
> wow, txs for that review.
>
> I personally think sirona can be something which is really interesting. But
> the code is pretty hardcore and thus we do hard in reaching 'starters'. Not
> sure how to improve this...
>
Even if I really agree :-), honest
On 25 June 2014 17:25, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry I been a bit busy with travel and other releases over the last few
> weeks.
>
> -1 binding due to vote issues, NOTICE and binaries in source release.
vote details below
binaries in source release?? (you mean from
https://dist.apache.org
Are there upgrade instructions from previous storm versions to 0.9.2?
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 1:28 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> The Storm team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Storm version
> 0.9.2-incubating. This is our second Apache release.
>
> Storm is a distributed, fault-tole
wow, txs for that review.
I personally think sirona can be something which is really interesting. But the
code is pretty hardcore and thus we do hard in reaching 'starters'. Not sure
how to improve this...
LieGrue,
strub
On Wednesday, 25 June 2014, 9:25, Justin Mclean
wrote:
>
>
>Hi,
>
>
Hi,
I found some inconsistencies in the July report.
Apache Stratos graduated in May, so it should not report anymore, right?
Flink is a new podling, and in my understanding, new podlings have to
report monthly in the first three months. The project is missing in the
list.
I think this commit
htt
The Storm team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Storm version
0.9.2-incubating. This is our second Apache release.
Storm is a distributed, fault-tolerant, and high-performance realtime
computation system that provides strong guarantees on the processing of data.
You can read more ab
Hi,
Opps my mistake - sorry must of missed some emails.
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jun 2014, Justin Mclean wrote:
>>
>> This VOTE has now been going on for more than a month. Anyone able to help
>> out here?
>
>
> I thought the vote had passed?
>
Yes. The [VOTE][RESULT] post is here:
http://markmail.org/message/
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014, Justin Mclean wrote:
This VOTE has now been going on for more than a month. Anyone able to
help out here?
I thought the vote had passed?
Only there was a release announcement about 3 weeks ago for
0.6.1-incubating:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-odf-d
+1
--
Olivier
On Jun 20, 2014 4:55 PM, "Leonidas Fegaras" wrote:
> Hello,
> This is a call for a vote on Apache MRQL 0.9.2 incubating.
> Apache MRQL is a query processing and optimization system for
> large-scale, distributed data analysis, built on top of Apache Hadoop,
> Apache Hama, and Apach
Hi,
This VOTE has now been going on for more than a month. Anyone able to help out
here?
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.a
Awesome! Thanks!!
We need just one more vote!
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 25, 2014, at 1:12 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> I checked:
> - vote looks good
> - incubating in artefact name
> - signatures and hashes all good
> - DISCLAIMER good
> - NOTICE and LICENSE correct
> - al
On 25 Jun 2014, at 10:38, ant elder wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
On 24 Jun 2014, at 21:27, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Upayavira wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014, at 12:02 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On 24 Jun 2014, at 7:24, Rom
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> On 24 Jun 2014, at 21:27, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Upayavira wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014, at 12:02 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> >>> On 24 Jun 2014, at 7:24, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> >>
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- vote looks good
- incubating in artefact name
- signatures and hashes all good
- DISCLAIMER good
- NOTICE and LICENSE correct
- all source files have Apache headers
- no binary files in source package
- can compile from source
I didn't run any test as I was not sure h
On 24 Jun 2014, at 21:27, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Upayavira wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014, at 12:02 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>> On 24 Jun 2014, at 7:24, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>> That said, reminding people of the "release often and early" thing is
>>> g
Hello,
It has been 5 days since we opened this vote for our second MRQL
release. We have collected one IPMC vote (from Alan Cabrera) and we
still need two more IPMC votes to approve the release.
It would be greatly appreciated If someone could take a look
at our release and vote on releasing Apach
Hi,
Sorry I been a bit busy with travel and other releases over the last few weeks.
-1 binding due to vote issues, NOTICE and binaries in source release.
I checked:
- missing VOTE RESULT and can't tell if there are 3 +1 binding votes or not.
There are 4 +1 votes on of which one is not binding
37 matches
Mail list logo
