Hi,
2014-06-14 0:17 GMT+02:00 Roman Shaposhnik :
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Marvin Humphrey
> wrote:
> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> Apache Celix Project:
>
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
> On 10 June 2014 16:20, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>
>> One fundamental problem with compiled deps is that unlike source code, they
>> cannot be reviewed by a PMC -- so they are potential trojan horses. Maybe
>> it's possible to address that s
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 9:31 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On 06/12/2014 07:56 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> This is one of the questions, I'd like to explore in greater details: are
>> we comfortable with having "professional student" projects in the
>> incubator?
>
> In response to the general qu
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I pinged Kalumet on their dev list and they seem keep to continue.
Hm. It would be useful if we could come up with concrete steps to move
this project in a particular direction. But even before that happens, I'd
like to make sure tha
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Per recent discussions on general@[1] and s4-dev@ [2], I went ahead and
> called for a VOTE on the S4 dev@ mailing list [3] about retiring the
> podling. That VOTE has passed with no -1s and 4 (binding) +1s from the
> podling PM
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
Apache Celix Project:
* Alexander Broekhuis
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 9:31 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> I've been around Celix for some time. It is small but a very
> robust community that is also slowly growing.
>
> Personally, I'd say its time to put this proposal for
> a general@ vote.
Hi Roman...
I was hoping that some of the other mor
+1 for retirement (binding)
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 1:23 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> +1 Please go ahead and retire from the incubator. (binding)
>
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Per recent discussions on general@[1] and s4-dev@ [2], I went ahead a
+1 (binding) to retire S4...
Craig
On Jun 13, 2014, at 11:36 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Per recent discussions on general@[1] and s4-dev@ [2], I went ahead and
> called for a VOTE on the S4 dev@ mailing list [3] about retiring the
> podling. That VOTE has passed with no -1s and 4 (
+1 Please go ahead and retire from the incubator. (binding)
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Per recent discussions on general@[1] and s4-dev@ [2], I went ahead and
> called for a VOTE on the S4 dev@ mailing list [3] about retiring the
> podling. That VOTE has
Hi all,
Per recent discussions on general@[1] and s4-dev@ [2], I went ahead and
called for a VOTE on the S4 dev@ mailing list [3] about retiring the
podling. That VOTE has passed with no -1s and 4 (binding) +1s from the
podling PMC/committers. (S4 only has committers, and doesn't distinguish
betwe
On 10 June 2014 16:20, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> One fundamental problem with compiled deps is that unlike source code, they
> cannot be reviewed by a PMC -- so they are potential trojan horses. Maybe
> it's possible to address that specific concern by compiling an ASF
> whitelist
> of individual
Hi,
I pinged Kalumet on their dev list and they seem keep to continue.
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
13 matches
Mail list logo
