+1
On 28/04/14 15:49, Chip Childers wrote:
Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
[ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator
[ ] +/-0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Brooklyn
[ ] -1 Do not accept Brook
+1
On Apr 29, 2014 3:43 AM, "Olivier Lamy" wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On 28 April 2014 23:49, Chip Childers wrote:
> > Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
> > Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubato
+1
On 28 April 2014 23:49, Chip Childers wrote:
> Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
> Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator
> [ ] +/-0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Brooklyn
> [ ] -1 Do
All,
There was an issue with the clutch report. Please see below for corrected
dates:
May 2014 Incubator report timeline:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2014
Wed May 07 -- Podling reports due by end of day
Sun May 11 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day
Sun May 11 -- Summ
Hi all,
May 2014 Incubator report timeline:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2014
Tue May 06 -- Podling reports due by end of day
Sat May 10 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day
Sat May 10 -- Summary due by end of day
Mon May 12 -- Mentor signoff due by end of day
Tue
Mine too +1
On 28 April 2014 15:44, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Suresh Marru wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Since entering Incubation in June 2013, the stratos podling has evolved and
>> is now ready to self-govern. The community has extensively debated
>> graduation readi
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Apr 28, 2014, at 6:49 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
> Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator
> [ ] +/-0 Indifferent to the acc
+1
+Vote of thanks to everyone who volunteered to become one of our mentors
Best
Duncan
On 28 April 2014 14:49, Chip Childers wrote:
> Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
> Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Broo
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Congrats and welcome to ASF incubator guys!
Indeed! Best of luck growing your community and project!
Thanks,
Roman.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubato
Congrats and welcome to ASF incubator guys!
- Henry
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
> After the week's voting, here's the results.
>
> Binding +1s:
>
> Arun C Murthy
> Suresh Srinivas
> Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
> Devaraj Das
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Jakob Homan
>
> Non-bin
+1
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Andrei Savu wrote:
> +1
>
> -- Andrei Savu
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Chip Childers >wrote:
>
> > Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
> > Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
> >
> > [ ]
After the week's voting, here's the results.
Binding +1s:
Arun C Murthy
Suresh Srinivas
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
Devaraj Das
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Jakob Homan
Non-binding +1s:
P. Taylor Goetz
larry mccay
On and after April 25:
Binding +1s:
Mahadev Konar
Non-binding +1s:
Dilli Arumugam
Edward
+1
-- Andrei Savu
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
> Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator
> [ ] +/-0 Indifferent to the acceptance
+1
-Jake
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
> Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator
> [ ] +/-0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Brook
+1 (binding)
Good luck guys
On Monday, April 28, 2014, Chip Childers wrote:
> Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
> Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator
> [ ] +/-0 Indifferent to the accept
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
> Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator
> [ ] +/-0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Brooklyn
> [ ] -1
Hi Rahul,
Sorry for the impasse. I will review this release and vote accordingly.
Suresh
On Apr 28, 2014, at 10:46 AM, Rahul Sharma wrote:
> Dear General,
>
> The vote has already run for over 10 days but still we are still short by
> 1 IPMC vote. We have been able to gather only 2 votes til
Dear General,
The vote has already run for over 10 days but still we are still short by
1 IPMC vote. We have been able to gather only 2 votes till date. I have
already asked a couple of times before but it did not work out. Now I am
not sure how to proceed further. Can some one please help us ou
+1
Greetings, Marcel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator
Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
[ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator
[ ] +/-0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Brooklyn
[ ] -1 Do not accept Brooklyn because...
The proposal can be found here
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Suresh Marru wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Since entering Incubation in June 2013, the stratos podling has evolved and
> is now ready to self-govern. The community has extensively debated graduation
> readiness [1] and overwhelmingly voted positively [2]. As far as I can
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:28:15AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
>> The Brooklyn project [1] community is interested in moving to the ASF. They
>> have worked within their community to create a proposal [2] for the
>> Incubator, and have manag
Hi All,
Since entering Incubation in June 2013, the stratos podling has evolved and is
now ready to self-govern. The community has extensively debated graduation
readiness [1] and overwhelmingly voted positively [2]. As far as I can tell the
project status is up to date [3]. The name search has
I am also agree with suggestions of Ted and Tommas.
Since Meerkat will be developed on top of Hama, it can be managed under
Hama project like hama-graph. In addition, developing Meerkat will not make
Hama changed largely (even not at all), because Hama is generic BSP
framework.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2
2014-04-28 10:45 GMT+02:00 Ted Dunning :
> Edward,
>
> Sub-projects are generally frowned on. Incubator projects can graduate
> eventually to a top-level project, but starting a project as a sub is not
> so good. The incubator docs on this are pretty good reading.
>
> But if the committer commun
Thanks Ted. I generally agree with your suggestion.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Edward,
>
> Sub-projects are generally frowned on. Incubator projects can graduate
> eventually to a top-level project, but starting a project as a sub is not
> so good. The incubator docs
Edward,
Sub-projects are generally frowned on. Incubator projects can graduate
eventually to a top-level project, but starting a project as a sub is not
so good. The incubator docs on this are pretty good reading.
But if the committer community for your real-time BSP is (or can be) the
same as
28 matches
Mail list logo
