[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.0.0 incubating RC3

2014-03-31 Thread James Taylor
Hi everyone, This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.0.0 incubating RC3. Phoenix is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed as a JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase tables using SQL. This is the next major release of Phoenix compatible with the

[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC3

2014-03-31 Thread James Taylor
Hi everyone, This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC3. Phoenix is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed as a JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase tables using SQL. This is the next major release of Phoenix compatible with the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.4.0-incubating RC0

2014-03-31 Thread sebb
On 31 March 2014 20:55, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:31 AM, sebb wrote: > >>> The jar files are also distributions and must therefore have embedded NOTICE and LICENSE files, e.g. in the META-INF directory. >>> >>> Does this warrant a new RC ? >> >> Yes, in my opinion. >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Stratosphere

2014-03-31 Thread Tzoumas, Kostas
On 31 Mar 2014, at 21:47, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Alan Gates wrote: >> I would like to propose Stratosphere as an Apache Incubator project. > > I've reviewed the proposal and it looks strong to me. The description of the > transition to a more publicly access

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.4.0-incubating RC0

2014-03-31 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:31 AM, sebb wrote: >> The jar files are also distributions and must therefore have embedded >>> NOTICE and LICENSE files, e.g. in the META-INF directory. >> >> Does this warrant a new RC ? > > Yes, in my opinion. Though the ASF only releases source code and the binaries

Re: [PROPOSAL] Stratosphere

2014-03-31 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Alan Gates wrote: > I would like to propose Stratosphere as an Apache Incubator project. I've reviewed the proposal and it looks strong to me. The description of the transition to a more publicly accessible project (moving from internal git to github, etc) seems

Slider Proposal

2014-03-31 Thread Steve Loughran
Hi For people wondering what's been happening with that Hoya proposal, I've got a successor proposal up for discussion. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SliderProposal This proposal -as well as having a different name- is a superset of the original draft. It emphasises that making the tool us

Re: Report Manager for April

2014-03-31 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 9:36 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > I can volunteer to do RM for next month. I can also do the shepherding > report for two podlings as usual. Thanks, John! We'll put you down for May. I'll be happy to support you in this endeavor. The Report Manager can produce the whole

Re: [CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.4.0-incubating RC0

2014-03-31 Thread Siddharth Seth
The vote is being cancelled due to missing LICENSE and NOTICE files in the published artifacts. I'll create another RC later today or tomorrow and start a new vote. Thanks - Sid On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Siddharth Seth wrote: > I have created a tez-0.4.0-incubating release candidate (rc

Re: Report Manager for April

2014-03-31 Thread John D. Ament
Hi, I can volunteer to do RM for next month. I can also do the shepherding report for two podlings as usual. The only reason I missed updating the page last month was due to some weather issues/power issues near me. By the time I got to the file with my results, the email had already gone out.

Re: Report Manager for April

2014-03-31 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> I plan on leaving May to someone else, though. :) > > Yup. The question is -- how can we strongly encourage > folks to step up? If we don't see anybody volunteering > I'm all for creative ideas of I dunno... report manager > duty lottery

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.4.0-incubating RC0

2014-03-31 Thread sebb
On 31 March 2014 02:51, Siddharth Seth wrote: > Sebb, Thanks for taking a look at the release. > > Will use a newline for the git/svn revision next time around. > > Generated the hashes using "openssl dgst -sha512 ". I'll change > the format on the next release. > > The jar files are also distribu

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for a Black Duck POC

2014-03-31 Thread Benson Margulies
During my, uh, tenure, as chair, I was unable to find any evidence of any actual work applied to IP clearance by the PMC as a group. People would post them up for lazy consensus, and the consensus, as far as any email evidence went, was in fact completely lazy. Is there anything this group wants to

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for a Black Duck POC

2014-03-31 Thread Jim Jagielski
I'd like to help however I can. On Mar 30, 2014, at 8:52 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > a few recent discussions around IP management > in the Incubator have lead to an interesting dialogue > between the fine folks from Black Duck Software and > yours truly. > > The main ides here is th

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for a Black Duck POC

2014-03-31 Thread Rob Vesse
Roman Black Duck software certainly have a useful platform though it would be useful to know what they are considering using for the POC. Personally I¹ve used their Protex software and I can state from experience that it is quite a time consuming and thankless process to work through IP Clearance