The vote passes with 4 +1s Thanks for the votes and for lots of constructive
feedback.
+1
---
Dave Brondsema
Rich Bowen
Jim Jagielski
Henry Saputra
0
--
None
-1
---
None
--
Dave Brondsema : d...@brondsema.net
http://www.brondsema.net : personal
http://www.splike.com : programming
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:10 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While not specifically incubator related, was wondering if someone at
> the incubator may provide me some insight.
>
> Right now, release votes cannot be veto'd. This seems like an
> oversight IMHO. If a release candidate is vis
On 3/17/14 1:30 PM, "Rich Bowen" wrote:
>
>On 03/17/2014 01:05 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>> I'm not a branding expert. Has the Apache VP of Branding approved the
>> look? You are correct that the word SourceForge is not on the site,
>>but I
>> thought branding included colors, icons, and layout a
On 03/17/2014 01:05 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
I'm not a branding expert. Has the Apache VP of Branding approved the
look? You are correct that the word SourceForge is not on the site, but I
thought branding included colors, icons, and layout and the goal is to
prevent confusion, and I was definite
Just wondering whether it might be useful to add a RETIRED marker file
to the top-level SVN directory of podlings that have retired?
It could just be an empty file, or it could contain a link to the
retired summary status, for example:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html#agila
I'm ha
On 17 March 2014 18:23, Cory Johns wrote:
> The ASF banner has been moved to the top right header, and will apply to
> all pages in the Project neighborhood. (Currently that should cover
> everything except user pages, but this is a temporary work-around until we
> can get a proper ASF theme star
The ASF banner has been moved to the top right header, and will apply to
all pages in the Project neighborhood. (Currently that should cover
everything except user pages, but this is a temporary work-around until we
can get a proper ASF theme started.)
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:06 PM, sebb wrot
I asked this same question not too long ago. The answer I got back was
that the PMC voters would have to vote -1 in order to execute their duties
as stewards of licenses and IP. Thus folks are not concerned that some
core of folks who don't care could somehow get the votes for such a bad
release.
Hi all,
While not specifically incubator related, was wondering if someone at
the incubator may provide me some insight.
Right now, release votes cannot be veto'd. This seems like an
oversight IMHO. If a release candidate is visibly wrong (e.g. bad
licenses, or something else), surely the relea
On 17 March 2014 16:53, Cory Johns wrote:
> Alex,
>
> The project is Allura, which does power the developer tools at SourceForge,
> and we're using an Allura instance on an Apache VM to "self-host" the
> project. Since Allura is a project management platform, in the interests
> of "eating our own
I'm not a branding expert. Has the Apache VP of Branding approved the
look? You are correct that the word SourceForge is not on the site, but I
thought branding included colors, icons, and layout and the goal is to
prevent confusion, and I was definitely confused, but it could just be me.
There
Alex,
The project is Allura, which does power the developer tools at SourceForge,
and we're using an Allura instance on an Apache VM to "self-host" the
project. Since Allura is a project management platform, in the interests
of "eating our own dogfood," we obviously want to continue to use Allura
The "Brought to you by" line has been hidden.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Mar 17, 2014, at 11:17 AM, Cory Johns wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 6:58 AM, sebb wrote:
> >
> >> On 15 March 2014 01:23, Justin Mclean wrote:
> >>>
> >>> While it's clear in th
Since we're still piling on, I just went to
https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/
and was pretty sure I had been redirected to SourceForge. It look and
feel of that page looks like all of the other SourceForge projects like
the Open@Adobe sites I have visited. I would think that:
1) Apache
On 17 March 2014 15:17, Cory Johns wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 6:58 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 15 March 2014 01:23, Justin Mclean wrote:
>> >
>> > While it's clear in the text and from the domain that the project is an
>> ASF one, the subtitles "Forge software for hosting software projects" an
On Mar 17, 2014, at 11:17 AM, Cory Johns wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 6:58 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 15 March 2014 01:23, Justin Mclean wrote:
>>>
>>> While it's clear in the text and from the domain that the project is an
>> ASF one, the subtitles "Forge software for hosting software proj
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 6:58 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 15 March 2014 01:23, Justin Mclean wrote:
> >
> > While it's clear in the text and from the domain that the project is an
> ASF one, the subtitles "Forge software for hosting software projects" and
> "Brought to you by: brondsem, masterbunnyfu, r
On 15 March 2014 01:23, Justin Mclean wrote:
> HI,
>
> Just a minor thing (IMO). I was just taking a look at [1] and what strikes me
> is a lack of ASF branding.
>
> While it's clear in the text and from the domain that the project is an ASF
> one, the subtitles "Forge software for hosting softw
HI,
Just a minor thing (IMO). I was just taking a look at [1] and what strikes me
is a lack of ASF branding.
While it's clear in the text and from the domain that the project is an ASF
one, the subtitles "Forge software for hosting software projects" and "Brought
to you by: brondsem, masterbun
Hi all,
The vote has passed with three binding +1 votes, no +0, and no -1
votes.
+1 votes:
* Dave Fisher
* Alan Cabrera
* Florian Müller
I will ask the board to add the resolution to the agenda of the next
board meeting.
Thanks!
Florian
Hi all,
The Apache Olingo community has VOTEd
20 matches
Mail list logo
