On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> The how-to-release documentation perhaps has more room for interpretation
> than is desirable.
FWIW, I've cleaned up some of the Incubator's Release Management guide and
though it's still messy overall, some chunks are ready for use IMO --
Hello everyone,
This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating. Phoenix is a
SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed as a
JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase tables using SQL. This
will be our first release in the incubator.
The RC is a
This vote is being cancelled because the RC did not include a source-only
tar ball. A new vote thread will be started with one that does.
Regards,
James
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 5:12 PM, James Taylor wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating. Phoeni
+1 (binding)
Arun
On Feb 23, 2014, at 11:31 AM, Hitesh Shah wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> I have created a tez-0.3.0-incubating release candidate (rc0). This is the
> second release for Tez.
>
> GIT source tag:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-tez/repo?p=incubator-tez.git;a=
+1 (binding)
-Jake
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> After a successful community VOTE [1] in which 4 IPMC members
> already VOTEd positively for graduation, I'm now calling an IPMC
> VOTE to graduate Tajo from
Thanks David!
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley
Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Date: Monday, February 24, 2014 1:20 PM
To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Cc: "d...@tajo.incubator.apache.org"
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Tajo from the Incubator
>Yep - +1 (
Yep - +1 (binding)
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
wrote:
> Awesome, thanks David, so is that your +1 for graduation?
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley
> Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
> Date: Sunday, February 23, 2
Thanks for the review, Sebb.
NOTICE file updated in trunk for the next release. I also made a change to our
how-to-release documentation to ensure that the git hash and svn revisions are
sent out in future votes.
thanks
-- Hitesh
On Feb 24, 2014, at 4:25 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 23 February 2014
On 24 February 2014 18:25, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Henry Saputra
> wrote:
>
>> Are you saying it is ok to contain compiled executed binaries if they
>> were signed?
>>
>
> I did not take a position on that.
>
> The how-to-release documentation perhaps has more ro
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Are you saying it is ok to contain compiled executed binaries if they
> were signed?
>
I did not take a position on that.
The how-to-release documentation perhaps has more room for interpretation
than is desirable.
There had been long dis
Hi Andrew,
Are you saying it is ok to contain compiled executed binaries if they
were signed?
There had been long discussion in general@ list about what should be
contained in release artifacts (with 0.8.1 Spark release) and I
believe the conclusion was to avoid executable binaries in the source
I'll cancel this vote and start a vote on a new RC shortly. There was a
pretty serious bug that was found in this one anyway.
Is it best practice to have a separate source-only tar bar and not include
the source in the binary tar ball? Or should it be included in both?
Thanks,
James
On Mon, Feb
Hi Sebb,
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 2:19 AM, sebb wrote:
> I've had a quick look at the (sole) archive, and it contains both
> source and compiled jars.
> Although it is OK to release convenience binaries, there must be a
> source only release, as that is the ASF mission - to release open
> source.
NOTICE and LICENSE looks good.
Hash and Sig files are good.
+1 (binding)
- Henry
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Dave Brondsema wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> This is a call for a vote on Apache Allura 1.1.0 incubating. This will be our
> second release in the incubator. Allura is forge software
On 23 February 2014 19:31, Hitesh Shah wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> I have created a tez-0.3.0-incubating release candidate (rc0). This is the
> second release for Tez.
>
> GIT source tag:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-tez/repo?p=incubator-tez.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/release-0.3
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> ...Congratulations to Roman Shaposhnik! The Incubator PMC has voted to
> recommend
> Roman as our next Chair in a resolution to the Board next week
FWIW, the corresponding resolution was passed by the ASF board last
week, so Roman as
+1.
2014-02-24 8:25 GMT+08:00 Bikas Saha :
> +1.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Hitesh Shah [mailto:hit...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014 11:31 AM
> To: d...@tez.incubator.apache.org; general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.3.0-incubating RC
+1.
-Original Message-
From: Hitesh Shah [mailto:hit...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014 11:31 AM
To: d...@tez.incubator.apache.org; general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.3.0-incubating RC0
Hello folks,
I have created a tez-0.3.0-incubating releas
+1
Thanks,
Gunther.
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Lianhui Wang wrote:
> +1.
>
>
> 2014-02-24 8:25 GMT+08:00 Bikas Saha :
>
> > +1.
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Hitesh Shah [mailto:hit...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014 11:31 AM
> > To: d...@tez.incubat
19 matches
Mail list logo
