I agree with Joe, voting on a moving target is not going to produce a result
anyone can look back on and understand. Chris, you may be able to understand
what is happening but I'm having trouble from my attempts to follow this thread.
thanks
david jencks
On Feb 9, 2014, at 5:29 PM, Joseph Scha
Joe,
Thanks for your cordial tone and to the point email. Thinking about it,
I agree with you. We'll start a new VOTE in a day or so to clean up
the resolution per Matei's updates and the typo fix caught by Sebb.
Cheers,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Schaefer
Reply-To: "gen
Chris no offense but all we can do is vote on what you put in front of us. As
soon as you realized that that document was a mess the vote should have been
cancelled. Right now you have no clear picture of what each vote *means*
because the thing we are supposed to be approving is in flux. Rig
Hi Sebb,
-Original Message-
From: sebb
Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Date: Sunday, February 9, 2014 4:39 PM
To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
>On 9 February 2014 17:11, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
> wrote:
>> T
On 9 February 2014 17:11, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
wrote:
> Thanks Matei and sebb.
>
> Starting a new thread and collecting the VOTEs all over again would be
> time consuming.
So?
Better to than being confusing, as the current thread has become.
Also it may not be clear whether new votes are in
Thanks Matei and sebb.
Starting a new thread and collecting the VOTEs all over again would be
time consuming. In the [RESULT] [VOTE] thread, we'll have the updated
resolution
text, and it will be present in the board report shortly thereafter. If
discussion
needs to continue at that point we can s
I think it would be better to start a new thread with the updated text.
Also, the two scope descriptions are slightly different:
"related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis
on clusters."
v.
"related to efficient cluster management, resource isolation
and sharing across distributed a
Thanks everyone for the votes. Since we now have accounts for everyone, I’ve
updated the committer list below to include ASF IDs. Thanks to INFRA, we also
now have both pull request postings and comments on them forwarded to the our
mailing list.
snip
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems
On 9 February 2014 06:47, Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 7:42 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> > WDYT?
>>
>> Non-trivial; maintaining the meta-data needed to accurately generate
>> the NOTICE file is likely to require more effort than writing the
>> NOTICE file itself.
>>
>
>
> Actually, this so
