Although I didn't author the mail, I would say YES, this is the file we're
voting on since the URL provided points to its directory (which is otherwise
only hashes and maven metadata stuff).
Kasper
From: Noah Slater [nsla...@apache.org]
Sent: 19 January 2
Yep, I'm happy to give a +1 but would still like clarification on
whether this file:
http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/org/apache/metamodel/MetaModel/4.0.0-incubating/MetaModel-4.0.0-incubating-source-release.zip
... Is *the* file we're voting on. The email
Sounds good to me Marvin.
I agree mentors votes are the ones should count most. I just want to make
sure no -1 VOTE from IPMCs about this RC.
- Henry
On Sunday, January 19, 2014, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Henry Saputra
> >
> wrote:
> > I assume we will get +1 f
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> I assume we will get +1 from you for this release candidate given
> Kasper's new JIRA task filed?
My freelance vote is not needed, and I'm not going to set a precedent
where Mentors don't have to vote because they can count on people like
me
HI Dave, just want to clarify if any concern or issue you raised
should block the RC or could we get +1 from you given the new JIRA
Kasper filed to fix the LICENSE?
- Henry
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Dave Brondsema wrote:
> Hi Ankit and other Metamodel developers,
>
> Congrats on getting t
I assume we will get +1 from you for this release candidate given
Kasper's new JIRA task filed?
- Henry
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:04 AM, Kasper Sørensen
> wrote:
>
>> I've made a task for the additional licenses in the LICENSE file that
Noah, can we address these with next release or do you think should
block the release?
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Just to be clear, is this the single release artefact we're voting on:
>
> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/org/ap
Hey Sebb
That column only shows that it is closed, not the actual status of the vote
itself. I am looking at how we can improve the voting status scripts for a
couple items that I noticed while cleaning everything up. I'll remove this
column when I get started
-Jake
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 9:2
The voting status page shows recently closed votes.
All of these have status "Resolved"
What does this status actually mean?
Does it mean that the vote thread has been closed?
If so, then the column in the table seems redundant as it will never
show anything else.
--
